Changes for Rnd 19 vs essendon

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aguy
    Senior Player
    • Mar 2014
    • 1324

    Changes for Rnd 19 vs essendon

    Okay. Time to start this thread.

    One change only for me. This is barring any suspension or injury concerns.

    IN Shaw
    OUT Laidler

    I think laidlers lack of pace was really shown up in defence last night. He has played well up to this point in the year but last night he was weak. The rest of the defence was also a bit weak. Smith had a poor game but that was an aberration

    Rohan was very good and saved a number of goals.

    Towers stays and he is sub again
  • stellation
    scott names the planets
    • Sep 2003
    • 9723

    #2
    How far away is Hanners?
    I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
    We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

    Comment

    • aguy
      Senior Player
      • Mar 2014
      • 1324

      #3
      Originally posted by stellation
      How far away is Hanners?
      Didn't we hear during the week that he was unlikely to be back for the essendon game.

      Comment

      • DK_
        On the Rookie List
        • Jun 2013
        • 454

        #4
        Originally posted by stellation
        How far away is Hanners?
        In the post-game conference, Horse said he's very unlikely to be back this week.

        Comment

        • barry
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 8499

          #5
          Laidler played very well. Took lots of strong marks. Him being isolated on hill is as much a problem for the whole defence as it is for him.

          Comment

          • aguy
            Senior Player
            • Mar 2014
            • 1324

            #6
            I definitely don't want hanners rushed back. Ideal the should play for the last two games of the season so he can find some touch for the finals. He is vital for our chances in September
            Last edited by aguy; 27 July 2014, 09:22 AM. Reason: Clarification

            Comment

            • MattW
              Veterans List
              • May 2011
              • 4231

              #7
              Originally posted by aguy
              Okay. Time to start this thread.

              One change only for me. This is barring any suspension or injury concerns.

              IN Shaw
              OUT Laidler

              I think laidlers lack of pace was really shown up in defence last night. He has played well up to this point in the year but last night he was weak. The rest of the defence was also a bit weak. Smith had a poor game but that was an aberration

              Rohan was very good and saved a number of goals.

              Towers stays and he is sub again
              I'd agree with all of that. Gary was excellent, and was complimented by Longmire in otherwise critical presser.

              Towers out if/when Hanners is back. The sub then would be interesting: Lloyd, Cunningham or Rohan? Maybe Harry at the moment, on form.

              Comment

              • aguy
                Senior Player
                • Mar 2014
                • 1324

                #8
                Originally posted by O'Reilly
                I'd agree with all of that. Gary was excellent, and was complimented by Longmire in otherwise critical presser.

                Towers out if/when Hanners is back. The sub then would be interesting: Lloyd, Cunningham or Rohan? Maybe Harry at the moment, on form.
                I think Harry too based on that. An intetseting dilemma. Rohan proved his defensive value last night and that's needed upfront not as the sub

                Comment

                • Matt80
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 1802

                  #9
                  Agree. But I would be concerned by Shaw's rustiness and fitness. Maybe he gets through 2.5 quarters then Towers comes on.

                  I think Rohan can offer everything that Laidler can and is much quicker with a better chase down tackle. Rohan's confidence is building. His defensive game is in good order. You will begin to see Rohan taking intercept marks and breaking the lines with counter-attack. It's very exciting. Well done the Swans for relaunching Rohan as a half back.

                  I was disappointed we lost to the Hawks as there will now be no proactive opportunity for a farewell game for ROK or LRT. If we were two games clear at top coming into the final round, we could have rested some tired players to play ROK and LRT and could have debuted Membrey, Hewitt and Toby N. We now have to win all games to remain top two and will pick our strongest side.

                  Comment

                  • Ampersand
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 694

                    #10
                    I think people are being very harsh on Laidler because of one moment with Puopolo. That was Longmire being outcoached by Clarkson.

                    Comment

                    • aguy
                      Senior Player
                      • Mar 2014
                      • 1324

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Ampersand
                      I think people are being very harsh on Laidler because of one moment with Puopolo. That was Longmire being outcoached by Clarkson.
                      I'm sure that incident is playing strongly but realistically Rohan deserves his spot and if shaw comes back who Are you gonna drop ?

                      Comment

                      • Ampersand
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Apr 2014
                        • 694

                        #12
                        Laidler will probably be suspended anyway but I'd drop Towers and move Lloyd to sub.

                        Comment

                        • aguy
                          Senior Player
                          • Mar 2014
                          • 1324

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ampersand
                          Laidler will probably be suspended anyway but I'd drop Towers and move Lloyd to sub.
                          So if you drop towers and laidler out With Lloyd as sub who are your ins?

                          Comment

                          • Ampersand
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Apr 2014
                            • 694

                            #14
                            I'm saying Laidler will probably be out due to suspension but if he isn't then it'd be

                            Out: Towers
                            In: Shaw

                            Comment

                            • Reggi
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 2718

                              #15
                              I thought Towers gave us some spark myself
                              You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

                              Comment

                              Working...