Changes for Rnd 15 V Brisbane Lions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ampersand
    On the Rookie List
    • Apr 2014
    • 694

    #31
    There's absolutely no way Towers is in the side for his defensive capability. If he was you'd hope he could average a lot more than 1.8 tackles a game - tackling is maximum pressure, not running around like a chicken with your head cut off while the opposition play keep away. Also, as evidenced by several contests on Thursday, he's pretty weak at winning the contested ground ball or even just locking it in which is a key stat for a defensive forward.

    Where Towers is strong is his attacking dash through the centre of the ground and providing a lead up target off half forward.

    Comment

    • RogueSwan
      McVeigh for Brownlow
      • Apr 2003
      • 4602

      #32
      Originally posted by Ampersand
      There's absolutely no way Towers is in the side for his defensive capability. If he was you'd hope he could average a lot more than 1.8 tackles a game - tackling is maximum pressure, not running around like a chicken with your head cut off while the opposition play keep away...
      I have just watched a replay of the game. Before doing so I was firmly in the "there must be a better option than Towers" club. But he, along with Cunningham provided a lot of defensive pressure on the Power backs in the last 2-3 minutes. They may not have been complete tackles but they were the proverbially 1%er's. A fist to a kick to beat two Power and force a ball up, a shepherd, a contested mark on the wing, a tap on to Kennedy.
      A small sample set granted, but he looked like a footballer to me. I am not yet completely convinced but if he stays in the team I would not be concerned.
      "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #33
        I would suspect the only certainties are Gaz out, and Franklin and Tippett in.
        So who else goes out?
        Probably either of Nanko or Towers. I would guess on the performance of both Towers would give way.

        Probably out also would be Ted. This would mean that Nanko would definitely stay.

        So the changes would most likely LF and KT in, for Gaz and DT.

        Comment

        • stevoswan
          Veterans List
          • Sep 2014
          • 8559

          #34
          Originally posted by ScottH
          I would suspect the only certainties are Gaz out, and Franklin and Tippett in.
          So who else goes out?
          Probably either of Nanko or Towers. I would guess on the performance of both Towers would give way.

          Probably out also would be Ted. This would mean that Nanko would definitely stay.

          So the changes would most likely LF and KT in, for Gaz and DT.
          With a ten day break between games, Ted should be fine, but as it is Brisbane, they may be conservative with him, and give someone else a go down there. Reid maybe, with Bud and Tip returning.

          Comment

          • Ampersand
            On the Rookie List
            • Apr 2014
            • 694

            #35
            No way Tippett and Franklin come in and both Nankervis and Pyke stay. We're too tall forward already.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by RogueSwan
            I have just watched a replay of the game. Before doing so I was firmly in the "there must be a better option than Towers" club. But he, along with Cunningham provided a lot of defensive pressure on the Power backs in the last 2-3 minutes. They may not have been complete tackles but they were the proverbially 1%er's. A fist to a kick to beat two Power and force a ball up, a shepherd, a contested mark on the wing, a tap on to Kennedy.
            A small sample set granted, but he looked like a footballer to me. I am not yet completely convinced but if he stays in the team I would not be concerned.
            I'm still firmly in the "there must be a better option than Towers" club. It's only that the better options were injured or suspended. I had no issue with him being selected and thought he delivered about on par with what was asked of him.

            Comment

            • aardvark
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2010
              • 5685

              #36
              Originally posted by Ampersand
              Where Towers is strong is his attacking dash through the centre of the ground.
              So long as he can actually gather the ball first........

              Comment

              • WauchopeAnalyst
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2008
                • 834

                #37
                Maybe were are lucky the Eski is not still playing with us. He is making Shaw look like Gary Ablett Junior. Kicking is absolutely sh@@@@@@.

                Comment

                • 0918330512
                  Senior Player
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 1654

                  #38
                  Originally posted by stevoswan
                  With a ten day break between games, Ted should be fine, but as it is Brisbane, they may be conservative with him, and give someone else a go down there. Reid maybe, with Bud and Tip returning.
                  10 day break is only 4 days short of a bye ...

                  Comment

                  • ugg
                    Can you feel it?
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15970

                    #39
                    In: franklin, Tippett, Robinson, Hiscox
                    Out: Rohan

                    Extended bench is
                    Harry Cunningham Jack Hiscox Zak Jones Jake Lloyd Tom Mitchell Toby Nankervis Daniel Robinson (Three to be omitted)

                    im guessing Hiscox Nankervis and Robinson will be the emergencies
                    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                    Reserves WIKI -
                    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                    Comment

                    • ernie koala
                      Senior Player
                      • May 2007
                      • 3251

                      #40
                      Towers holds his spot after yet another fumbling , ineffectual, soft, performance...

                      I officially have a new whipping boy....McVeigh was my last one, so I hope I'm as wrong about this guy.
                      Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                      Comment

                      • churry
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Mar 2014
                        • 238

                        #41
                        Towers might not play although being named in starting lineup says a lot... If he does play I hope he's the sub. I imagine it will be nankervis that's going to miss out. Franklin Tippett the only ins.
                        Using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • WauchopeAnalyst
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 834

                          #42
                          Originally posted by ernie koala
                          Towers holds his spot after yet another fumbling , ineffectual, soft, performance...

                          I officially have a new whipping boy....McVeigh was my last one, so I hope I'm as wrong about this guy.
                          Unfortunately Towers is in 2nd position behind Shaw as Whipping Boy's. Drafted as an mature draftee, 22 years old, from bendigo, i think, but will never be able to take a lot of marks and ground ball wins will be nearly zero. I am giving Harry a little more time and as he has Towers covered, meaning that Towers is in a lot of trouble if Heeney, Robbo and Hiscox are coming.

                          Comment

                          • WauchopeAnalyst
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Sep 2008
                            • 834

                            #43
                            Which one of the players will run with Pierce Hanley, Towers, Cunningham or Hiscox? Usually harry gets that job.

                            Comment

                            • Nico
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 11339

                              #44
                              Gee they cut Shaw some slack.
                              http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                              Comment

                              • WauchopeAnalyst
                                Regular in the Side
                                • Sep 2008
                                • 834

                                #45
                                I think if Shaw kicked to his dad in the crowd, 5 times, and would still be selected.

                                Comment

                                Working...