Towers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mattybloods
    Warming the Bench
    • Jul 2016
    • 482

    #31
    Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
    It is obvious we play a style of football that requires a strong bodied midfield rotation to win that footy

    We dont play a chip and pass uncontested style

    But for our style to win we also need some fast outside players to negate the run of other top teams who have a stack of fast players ie a GWS

    Who should we trade in for towers for his outside role ?

    Can we make this happen cost effectively ?
    This. Is Brandon Jack ready to step up in an outside mid role if Towers moves on? Seems to be consistently in ressies best players

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      #32
      See what happens when McFantastic AND Towers have a great game!!!
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • longmile
        Crumber
        • Apr 2011
        • 3367

        #33
        Originally posted by mattybloods
        This. Is Brandon Jack ready to step up in an outside mid role if Towers moves on? Seems to be consistently in ressies best players
        Problem with Brandon is though he wins a lot of the footy and is very quick his disposal is horrible

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          #34
          Originally posted by longmile
          Problem with Brandon is though he wins a lot of the footy and is very quick his disposal is horrible
          ....he's not the only one.
          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #35
            Originally posted by CureTheSane
            Don't ya love it when people get really picky about terminology used.
            Regardless, hate would be interpreted for the way he plays and his skill set, obviously not as a personality description.
            "Never to play again" and other nice phrases were thrown around a couple of weeks ago, blaming him for losses etc.

            I also note that apparently Mc H a c k has been banned. That's pretty silly. I don't think it has been used in a descriptive way of McVeigh for years. It's only ever used in discussion , as I did.
            McHack.
            It was the last one added many years ago.

            Comment

            Working...