Rnd 21. MDT. St Kilda V Sydney. ES , 7:25pm

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • longmile
    Crumber
    • Apr 2011
    • 3367

    #91
    Richmond beating Geelong so far. Would be great news. Would almost assure a top 4 spot from here on in after GWS lost yesterday

    Comment

    • Mel_C
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 4470

      #92
      Originally posted by longmile
      Richmond beating Geelong so far. Would be great news. Would almost assure a top 4 spot from here on in after GWS lost yesterday
      I am at that game and Geelong are terrible. It's interesting how they tend to play badly against the bottom 8 sides. Hopefully we don't play this bad against the tigers in a couple of weeks.

      Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • Wardy
        The old Boiler!
        • Sep 2003
        • 6676

        #93
        And that Freo have an epiphany and get up over Adelaide!!!
        I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
        Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
        AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

        Comment

        • Wardy
          The old Boiler!
          • Sep 2003
          • 6676

          #94
          Oh well Freo have let us down!!
          I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
          Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
          AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

          Comment

          • troyjones2525
            Swans Fanatic!
            • Mar 2008
            • 2908

            #95
            So have Richmond by the look of it...

            Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • Meg
              Go Swannies!
              Site Admin
              • Aug 2011
              • 4828

              #96
              Yep, can't trust those Tigers!

              Comment

              • mcs
                Travelling Swannie!!
                • Jul 2007
                • 8168

                #97
                Originally posted by troyjones2525
                So have Richmond by the look of it...

                Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
                Typical from Richmond but by gee there was some absolutely diabolical umpiring in that last quarter.

                In particular, Riewoldt should have had a clear free kick for holding in the goal square - no free kick and Geelong took it coast to coast to kick a goal. Next set of play, there were what I consider at least 2, maybe even 3 clear free kicks to Richmond in their forward line about 30 out, and again Geelong got away with it and took it up the other end for a goal - off a free kick no less for a very similar offence. Richmond should easily have held that lead, and have shown why they are such a fragile and mediocre club, but by gee the Umpires did their bit took at a critical time in the match. Either of those end up in goals for Richmond as they probably would have and they would of held on.
                "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                Comment

                • Ludwig
                  Veterans List
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 9359

                  #98
                  I think it's better for us if Geelong and Adelaide win, and keep the Giants out of the top 4. We should win the next 2 and secure a top 2 finish and would prefer to play anyone but the Giants. I'm more worried now that WC will beat Hawthorn and the Giants will come back into the 4, but probably not 4th, so we won't have to play them 1st up.

                  Comment

                  • Mel_C
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 4470

                    #99
                    Originally posted by mcs
                    Typical from Richmond but by gee there was some absolutely diabolical umpiring in that last quarter.

                    In particular, Riewoldt should have had a clear free kick for holding in the goal square - no free kick and Geelong took it coast to coast to kick a goal.
                    Nah just before that a Geelong player was dumped after he got rid of it so it should have been a free to the cats. It happened right in front of me.

                    Cats had way more scoring shots so should have won by more. The tigers were very efficient going forward...at one point they had 13 scoring shots from only 19 entries. Tigers had no run in the last quarter.

                    Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • mcs
                      Travelling Swannie!!
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 8168

                      Originally posted by Mel_C
                      Nah just before that a Geelong player was dumped after he got rid of it so it should have been a free to the cats. It happened right in front of me.

                      Cats had way more scoring shots so should have won by more. The tigers were very efficient going forward...at one point they had 13 scoring shots from only 19 entries. Tigers had no run in the last quarter.

                      Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk
                      Of course the cats should have won by more, and Richmond were woeful late - but I think geelong had the rub of the green at the critical times - a goal to Richmond might have been enough to really shift the momentum enough to get the tigers home. Ah well, least geelong didn't get a percentage boost out of it.
                      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                      Comment

                      • Wardy
                        The old Boiler!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 6676

                        I need a live ladder!!!!
                        I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                        Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                        AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                        Comment

                        • azzzr
                          Pushing for Selection
                          • Jun 2016
                          • 52

                          Originally posted by Wardy
                          I need a live ladder!!!!
                          1.hawks
                          2.swans
                          3.adelaide ( needed to win by over 100 to jump us )
                          4.geelong
                          who cares about the rest

                          Comment

                          • Wardy
                            The old Boiler!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 6676

                            Thanks azzzr!!
                            I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                            Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                            AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                            Comment

                            • ugg
                              Can you feel it?
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 15971

                              Live AFL Ladder
                              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                              Reserves WIKI -
                              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                              Comment

                              • goswannies
                                Senior Player
                                • Sep 2007
                                • 3051

                                Freo are simply pathetic. Richmond are worse ... except they like to beat us

                                Comment

                                Working...