Changes for round 1 - Syd vs Port

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ludwig
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 9359

    #31
    Originally posted by wolftone57
    I haven't seen a lot in Foote that excites me but he does seem to be one of Horse's pets, all coaches have them. (Mug Punter)

    The reason he would be a favourite is simply this; He might not have the talent of some others but he works twice as hard. He is 100% dedicated, he learns because he is willing to listen. Coaches love that.

    As to the make up of the side at this stage these players are doubtful for round 1; Parksie, Aliir, Buddy, Rohan, Papley, Laidler & Naismith. Add the retired McGlinn (Teddy did not play toward the end of the season) & Turncoat Mitchell. There could be up to 9 players missing from the best 2016 side. If this occurs I think we need to rethink the forward-line, more than any other area. I'd bring in Dawson & Reid. Play Reid at CHF & Dawson in the pocket w Tip, Casey or Sinkas at FF. Shift Hayward to the other pocket. Florent to HF.
    Foote has made some real progress in his 2 years at the club. He is quick and has good endurance. His skills are okay and he plays a good contested brand of footy. So there's a lot to like about him without being the coach's pet. I don't think he's that far outside the best 22 and should get some senior chances this season.

    I think it's a bit pessimistic on your doubtful calls on the the injury front. We know Papley is out and Ladler is unlikely, but rest are more likely available for round 1 than not, if they don't suffer any setbacks. Buddy and Parker should be ready and it's not great shakes if the others are delayed a couple of rounds.

    I wouldn't call Mitchell a turncoat. He was forced out. Although I rate him highly, I think it was a good move that benefits both clubs. We effectively traded Mitchell for Florent, which eases the salary cap somewhat and shifts the mix of players in a direction which suits our need, i.e. speed and flare.

    Comment

    • dejavoodoo44
      Veterans List
      • Apr 2015
      • 8665

      #32
      Originally posted by Ludwig
      Foote has made some real progress in his 2 years at the club. He is quick and has good endurance. His skills are okay and he plays a good contested brand of footy. So there's a lot to like about him without being the coach's pet. I don't think he's that far outside the best 22 and should get some senior chances this season.

      I think it's a bit pessimistic on your doubtful calls on the the injury front. We know Papley is out and Ladler is unlikely, but rest are more likely available for round 1 than not, if they don't suffer any setbacks. Buddy and Parker should be ready and it's not great shakes if the others are delayed a couple of rounds.

      I wouldn't call Mitchell a turncoat. He was forced out. Although I rate him highly, I think it was a good move that benefits both clubs. We effectively traded Mitchell for Florent, which eases the salary cap somewhat and shifts the mix of players in a direction which suits our need, i.e. speed and flare.
      I don't know, I tend to favour turncoat Mitchell. Not for any real logical reason. It's more the fact that it's such an easy flow, from hating Sam Mitchell of Hawthorn, to hating Tom Mitchell of Hawthorn.

      Comment

      • Nico
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 11339

        #33
        Ludwig, oh wise one, how many sizes do you think Foote is ahead of Cunningham.
        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

        Comment

        • RogueSwan
          McVeigh for Brownlow
          • Apr 2003
          • 4602

          #34
          Originally posted by Ludwig
          ... I wouldn't call Mitchell a turncoat. He was forced out...
          Nah, he could have taken the contract offered to him but he wanted, and if we are being honest, probably deserved more money.
          It is just annoying that we developed him into the more rounded footballer he is now but the Poos and Wees are the ones to benefit from it. It wouldn't have been so bad if he went to a team that doesn't look likely to play finals for a while. North? :-)
          "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

          Comment

          • caj23
            Senior Player
            • Aug 2003
            • 2462

            #35
            Originally posted by RogueSwan
            Nah, he could have taken the contract offered to him but he wanted, and if we are being honest, probably deserved more money.
            It is just annoying that we developed him into the more rounded footballer he is now but the Poos and Wees are the ones to benefit from it. It wouldn't have been so bad if he went to a team that doesn't look likely to play finals for a while. North? :-)
            I doubt the Hawks are going to be much of a finals threat in the next couple of years, they are light years behind GWS and Bulldogs

            Comment

            • Ludwig
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2007
              • 9359

              #36
              I have long stated that I thought we purposely low-balled our offer to Tom Mitchell to give him little choice but to leave. And I think it was a good strategic move on the part of our list management group. The players we really want to keep manage to get the contracts they want. I think the trade has worked out well for us. There's no reason to label Tom a turncoat. He's a real pro who gave his all every game he played for us.


              Originally posted by Nico
              Ludwig, oh wise one, how many sizes do you think Foote is ahead of Cunningham.
              I'm not sure anyone is ahead of Cunningham. I just suggested that Foote might be ahead of Robinson.

              You wouldn't believe the odds I got on a Cunningham-Robinson Brownlow Quinella. I'll be loaded up for a big celebration of our premiership victory.

              Comment

              • 707
                Veterans List
                • Aug 2009
                • 6204

                #37
                OK, so we are getting into the preseason matches and things are becoming a little clearer.

                Already missing for R1 and probably further into the season are Papley, Rohan & of corse AJ. Hoping for everyone else to be fit including Naismith, Laidler, Aliir etc.

                My team assuming everyone with niggles is available and without using fringe players shows we need at least three possibly four players for R1. So who are these 3-4 players? That's what is interesting about these preseason games, will anyone step up because we desperately need them to fill the depth in our best 22.

                Laidler will get one fringe spot, need Cunningham, Foote, Robinson, Newman, O'Riordan, Florent etc to really show something this preseason.

                Comment

                • Mug Punter
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 3325

                  #38
                  Rampe Aliir Smith
                  Mills Reg McVeigh
                  Heeney Hanners Lloyd
                  Parker Reid Hewett
                  Jack Buddy Tippo

                  Naismith JPK Jones

                  Inter: Towers, Foote, Florent, Cunningham

                  Injured/Fringe - Rose, Laidler, Robinson, Rohan, Marsh, Talia, Newman, Papley

                  Comment

                  • Nico
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 11339

                    #39
                    If Allir doesn't come up, Marsh comes in. I thought Marsh looked good today. Put Rampe and Grundy back in and he fits the structure perfectly. Reads the play well and plays with poise; I don't see him panicking at all and is hard at it.
                    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                    Comment

                    • aguy
                      Senior Player
                      • Mar 2014
                      • 1324

                      #40
                      Just going back to my way of outs and ins ( helps me organise my thoughts ). I'm currently thinking as follows with the assumption that Naismith, buddy and Laidler are fit for round one.

                      OUT: Mitchell (traded), Rohan (injured), Mcglynn (retired), Papley (injured), Richards (delisted), Laidler (dropped)

                      INS: Foote, Cunningham, Florrent, Aliir, Marsh, Reid

                      Close to selection Robinson, Laidler, Towers, Newman, Talia, Edwards, Rose

                      Comment

                      • Auntie.Gerald
                        Veterans List
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 6480

                        #41
                        Ive added in swampy because of his ability to man mark and run forward with smaller to medium forwards ( if given the role) but he is also there to allow Edwards to play lose and back deeper on the flanks ......yet have someone who can pick up an opposition mid dropping into our backline ......I think they compliment the rotation better then Newman being in the backline or Laidler

                        Parker looks under done returning from injury so round one he will get a good 30% of time up front and heeney more in the mids

                        I think Robinson is ahead of foote for Rd 1

                        I think get Florent in there from the get go.......he is classy no doubt


                        SNRS:

                        Parker Reid, Florent
                        Kizza, Bud, Hewett

                        Tippo
                        Kennedy (C)
                        Jones
                        Hannes
                        Heeney
                        Lloyd

                        Smithy, AA, Mills
                        Rampe, Grundy, Swampy

                        19. Macca
                        20. Naismith
                        21. Robinson
                        22. Edwards
                        "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                        Comment

                        • ernie koala
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2007
                          • 3251

                          #42
                          My Round1 team... at this stage....Lots of assumptions, Re fitness...or lack there of.

                          B: Smith, Grundy, Marsh
                          HB: Jones, Rampe, Mills
                          C: Lloyd, Kennedy, Hannebery
                          HF: Heeney, Reid, Hewett
                          FF: McVeigh, Franklin, Cunningham
                          FOL: Tippett , Jack, Parker

                          INTER: Cameron, Talia , Robinson, Edwards

                          EMG: Florent, Newman, Foote
                          Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                          Comment

                          • RogueSwan
                            McVeigh for Brownlow
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 4602

                            #43
                            Originally posted by ernie koala
                            My Round1 team... at this stage....Lots of assumptions, Re fitness...or lack there of.

                            ...
                            HB: Jones, Rampe, Mills
                            ...
                            After seeing yesterdays game it doesn't look like Jones will be a back anymore. He looked a natural midfielder.
                            "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                            Comment

                            • bloodspirit
                              Clubman
                              • Apr 2015
                              • 4448

                              #44
                              I have to say I much prefer MP's and AG's team to yours, ernie. Sorry! Generally, I take what you have to say very seriously. You were outstanding at tipping selections 12 months ago.

                              I think Kizza will go forward and Parker, as noted, may need to spend more time forward also, which creates space for Jones to enter the midfield where he will thrive. And did you decide Aliir is too injured to play R1 or overlook him? There is a tight battle between Florent and Cunningham for a spot in the forward line. I would be more excited to see Florent, because he seems the classier player and the better longer term prospect, but Harry may be the smarter choice because he has the experience, maturity (which leads to better consistency) and form.

                              I note you (ernie & AG) both have Tippo as number 1 ruck. I get that Tippo is perhaps our best ruck but not by much and, conversely, he is very significantly better playing in the forward line than the others. So, I think if Naismith is the other ruckman in the team Naismith should be primarily in the ruck and resting forward while Tippo plays deep and relieves in the ruck. If it's one of the other rucks partnering Tip, then maybe I'd keep Tippo on the ball.

                              The hardest part is selecting the bench. Foote or Robinson? I probably lean to Robbo because he is more versatile and Foote is not going to be selected to play as an inside mid, which is what he's best at. Also, my impression is that Robbo is faster (and Foote harder) but I think they will play forward if selected and the speed is vital to applying pressure when playing forward. I haven't seen Edwards play yet so can't judge whether he deserves a spot but I think he'll have to have more than one alright JLT game to earn it.
                              All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                              Comment

                              • 707
                                Veterans List
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 6204

                                #45
                                We need 3-4 new/fringe players for R1, just can't see from yesterday's game who is really putting their hand up strongly. It wasn't as if we were playing a full strength AFL side, Norf had half a team of kids and nobodies as well.

                                For me, Cunningham was his usual self, just fringish. Robbo & Foote really needed to do a lot more. Florent looks ok but he is very young and slight. In that context Newman was by far the best of an ordinary bunch of players hoping for a R1 berth and IMO has more upside. I think he would look even better when he is surrounded by Reg, Smith, Rampe, Macca, Lloyd, Aliir, he then just has to play a role not take centre stage as he had to yesterday.

                                I'm really worried about our depth after seeing that yesterday, I'm thinking compare our last six with say GWS last six - scary!

                                Comment

                                Working...