Changes for Round 4 - West Coast

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wolftone57
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2008
    • 5850

    Originally posted by DynamoJim
    Cunningham to come in for a tagging role on Mitchell?
    What a joke. Harry will get killed. He has the intensity of a used condom at the moment and Mitchell will murder him. You just can't take the peddle off against Sam Mitchell as he is the best inside mid in the comp, not to mention the best disposer in the comp. I'd play Foote on him. Not because Foote displays any great skill but exactly becaue he doesn't. He is tight and is a good tagger and I think could take Mitchell and bury him every time he gets the ball.

    Comment

    • longmile
      Crumber
      • Apr 2011
      • 3364

      Sheesh forgot about Ladler
      He'd be feeling pretty poor, he'd be an easy pick in this side

      Comment

      • Foreign Legion
        Senior Player
        • Feb 2003
        • 3354

        Originally posted by longmile
        Sheesh forgot about Ladler
        He'd be feeling pretty poor, he'd be an easy pick in this side
        It is strange as I reckon he could ruck - Towers like - in a pinch. Luckily the Weagles don't have a great ruck presence at the moment.

        Comment

        • wolftone57
          Veterans List
          • Aug 2008
          • 5850

          Originally posted by liz
          I thought Cunningham's skills were a level above most of the other Swans last week (at NEAFL level). They were certainly a whole lot better than Jack's.
          I watched the game again today Liz and his lack of intensity at the contest is not only puzzling it is worrying. His short kicks were good but his long kicks were ordinary, not put to the advantage of the forwards. In fact Toby Pink and Murray made him look good several times by providing hard contests. It isn't just his skills, which were better than BJs but the intensity is missing.

          No, Fisher's skills were far better than Harry's, having seen the replay so were Edward's skills.

          Comment

          • Meg
            Go Swannies!
            Site Admin
            • Aug 2011
            • 4828

            Originally posted by longmile
            Sheesh forgot about Ladler
            He'd be feeling pretty poor, he'd be an easy pick in this side
            Still in the naughty corner for the kick OOB on the full?

            Comment

            • Meg
              Go Swannies!
              Site Admin
              • Aug 2011
              • 4828

              Originally posted by Ludwig
              I think we should pull Sinclair as a precaution and not risk him being injured for the Giants' game next week. We need him to be sacrificed to the Mummy. Our other ruckmen are too fragile for that kind of assignment. We don't have to put anyone in the ruck contests. Their ruckmen don't know what they're doing anyway, so we are more likely to win the ball by just laying back .
              Yes, it seems to be fashionable not to contest the ruck on occasion. Apparently Sandilands got so confused when no one went up against him one time he punched the ball OOB and gave away a free kick.

              Couldn't do it every time though or even the dumbest ruck opponent would get the hang of punching the ball halfway to the goal square.

              Comment

              • MattW
                Veterans List
                • May 2011
                • 4206

                Originally posted by wolftone57
                What a joke. Harry will get killed. He has the intensity of a used condom at the moment and Mitchell will murder him. You just can't take the peddle off against Sam Mitchell as he is the best inside mid in the comp, not to mention the best disposer in the comp. I'd play Foote on him. Not because Foote displays any great skill but exactly becaue he doesn't. He is tight and is a good tagger and I think could take Mitchell and bury him every time he gets the ball.
                My first thought was that Cunningham had come in to tag Mitchell (he's had some tagging roles before from memory), but you could be right about Foote. Averages 5 tackles a game in his 3 games.

                I'm happy for Papley to come back. He's in our best 22 and obviously judged to be fit enough. We need forwards who lead and mark. He'll also chase and tackle. His first game of AFL was pretty handy from memory, so can pick up the intensity quickly.

                Cunningham better have a blinder, but again I don't mind the selection. It's not as though Dawson was prolific defensively last week. We also seemed a bit too weighed to youth last weekend.

                Having said that, slightly surprised we didn't select Melican. Suggests Aliir won't pinch hut in the ruck too much (leaving our forward line super small when Reid does).

                Comment

                • Ludwig
                  Veterans List
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 9359

                  Originally posted by Meg
                  Couldn't do it every time though or even the dumbest ruck opponent would get the hang of punching the ball halfway to the goal square.
                  Not so sure about that. Want to reconsider?

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16754

                    Originally posted by wolftone57

                    No, Fisher's skills were far better than Harry's, having seen the replay so were Edward's skills.
                    I had Edwards up there with Jack as the worst skilled player on the board (at least of the listed senior players). Neither can kick. Edwards had one set shot at goal from well within the 50m arc and barely any angle and he managed to kick it OOBOTF.

                    Comment

                    • Meg
                      Go Swannies!
                      Site Admin
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 4828

                      Originally posted by Ludwig
                      Not so sure about that. Want to reconsider?

                      You are so cruel!

                      Comment

                      • Auntie.Gerald
                        Veterans List
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 6474

                        the team on our swans site video is very different in starting possies to what is on the AFL site

                        Tom Papley will play his first game for the year after being named in the team to take on West Coast on Thursday night at Domain Stadium.


                        this is the team below as per swans website video team announcement etc

                        I just love the mids Florent, Hannes and Mills as it could be the midfield for many many years........I know when Heeney comes back it changes things but the youth looks awesome in potential and Mills being more and more up in the midfield looks a better balance

                        Def: Marsh, Grundy, Jones
                        Def: Lloyd, AA, Smith
                        Mids: Florent, Hannebery, Mills
                        For: Hewett, Reid,Foote
                        For: Paps, Franklin, Jack
                        Ruck: Sinclair, Kennedy, Parker

                        Interchange: Hayward, Cunningham, Newman, Fox

                        Don't be surprised to see a little bit of magic coaching when Reid goes to help in the Ruck........ we may just see the next chapter of Will Haywards meteoric rise.............

                        Will standing at FF one on one and saying catch me if you can !!!!! lol !!!!

                        freakish young talent and looks hungrier then Gary Rohan ever has as the random jack out of the box player upfront
                        "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                        Comment

                        • dejavoodoo44
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2015
                          • 8558

                          Originally posted by 707
                          Like your thinking, leaping player, mobile, can't think of any other positive .......

                          Hope Dawson gets another game, suited to Subiaco.
                          ...gets knocked out early, no one minds.

                          Comment

                          • dejavoodoo44
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2015
                            • 8558

                            Originally posted by Foreign Legion
                            It is strange as I reckon he could ruck - Towers like - in a pinch. Luckily the Weagles don't have a great ruck presence at the moment.
                            Yep, I reckon that Laidler would probably quite like a go in the ruck.

                            - - - Updated - - -

                            Originally posted by Ludwig
                            Not so sure about that. Want to reconsider?

                            Sorry, I'm not really up on pop culture. Is that the guy from One Direction?

                            Comment

                            • Bloody Hell
                              Senior Player
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 3085

                              The ruck solution(?) is a big concern. A lack of options, but I'm sure no one had Sinclair as the sole ruck going into the game.

                              They say thoroughbred's shouldn't ruck, but if Sinclair goes down in the first quarter, will we see Reid and Franklin rucking out the game?!?
                              The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                              Comment

                              • redsox
                                Pushing for Selection
                                • Jul 2007
                                • 62

                                Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald

                                Def: Marsh, Grundy, Jones
                                Def: Lloyd, AA, Smith
                                Mids: Florent, Hannebery, Mills
                                For: Hewett, Reid,Foote
                                For: Paps, Franklin, Jack
                                Ruck: Sinclair, Kennedy, Parker

                                Interchange: Hayward, Cunningham, Newman, Fox
                                This team is terrible. The half forward and half back line scares no one.

                                Would have lost last years GF by 12 goals. Even allowing for the improvement by the omission of Rohan and Tippett.

                                The only consolation is that, IMHO, that west coast aren't any good and failed their first test quite badly last week. If this game wasn't in WA it would be a coin flip. Especially if smith can cancel Lecras.

                                A rebuild on the run. If anyone can do such a thing it is this club. Let's hope they can keep the good kids with so much salary cap invested in so few ( although , for th most part, exceptional players)

                                A game against the hawks this week would have been so intriguing.

                                Comment

                                Working...