Changes for Rnd 13 V Richmond

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ludwig
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 9359

    #31
    It certainly is tight for spots atm so dropping any player might seem unfair, but here are a few possibilities:
    1. Sinclair should definitely be dropped. He's playing his best footy now, but we still have 2 players taking up 1 spot and Naismith is the better ruckman. Aliir in.
    2. Marsh is playing well enough to hold his spot and Laidler has been doing his best in the reserves to earn a spot in the side, but we just have too many playing well in that role right now. Aliir is a more versatile option that gives us something different. Dawson in for Marsh.
    3. Towers has been playing his best footy lately and it would be sad for him to be dropped, but there are other options and he's not a critical part of the side. I'm not sure if Towers holds his spot against a fit Cunningham.
    4. Hayward has been great this year, but he's being judged on the basis of a first year 18 yo player. He definitely adds something to the side, but like Towers, is not a critical part of the side and we have other options.


    Rohan, Towers and Hayward in a fight for 2 spots. If we include Tippett, we could say that there are 8 or 9 players trying to fit into 4 spots in the side. Both Cunningham and Robinson would be part of the mix when fit.

    Tippett and Naismith fighting it out for the ruckman spot, while Sinclair falls out of the equation. I wouldn't mind giving Dawson a go in lieu of either Towers or Hayward. Dawson's form has been so strong and consistent this season he should get a chance to show what he can do at senior level.

    KJ stays in; building form and not considered (by me) for dropping.

    Comment

    • Faunac8
      Senior Player
      • Mar 2014
      • 1548

      #32
      So Ludwig just for those who are not sure of your viewpoint should we bring AA into the team this week? ????

      Comment

      • barry
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 8499

        #33
        It can't be tight for spots in a team that is 4-7. !

        Comment

        • Nico
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 11337

          #34
          Originally posted by Ludwig
          It certainly is tight for spots atm so dropping any player might seem unfair, but here are a few possibilities:
          1. Sinclair should definitely be dropped. He's playing his best footy now, but we still have 2 players taking up 1 spot and Naismith is the better ruckman. Aliir in.
          2. Marsh is playing well enough to hold his spot and Laidler has been doing his best in the reserves to earn a spot in the side, but we just have too many playing well in that role right now. Aliir is a more versatile option that gives us something different. Dawson in for Marsh.
          3. Towers has been playing his best footy lately and it would be sad for him to be dropped, but there are other options and he's not a critical part of the side. I'm not sure if Towers holds his spot against a fit Cunningham.
          4. Hayward has been great this year, but he's being judged on the basis of a first year 18 yo player. He definitely adds something to the side, but like Towers, is not a critical part of the side and we have other options.


          Rohan, Towers and Hayward in a fight for 2 spots. If we include Tippett, we could say that there are 8 or 9 players trying to fit into 4 spots in the side. Both Cunningham and Robinson would be part of the mix when fit.

          Tippett and Naismith fighting it out for the ruckman spot, while Sinclair falls out of the equation. I wouldn't mind giving Dawson a go in lieu of either Towers or Hayward. Dawson's form has been so strong and consistent this season he should get a chance to show what he can do at senior level.

          KJ stays in; building form and not considered (by me) for dropping.
          Gee that's complicated and confusing. They way I figure it, if I apply the Pythagoras Theory, Sinclair has a spot. He was a mate of Confucius who says don't confuse the issue with too much bulldust. Otherwise if I try to decipher what you were really saying, it is that Allir should be first ruck starting on the wing.

          Perhaps we could make Allir and Rohan the Senior Runners and interchange them every 10 minutes. This way we can keep all RWOers happy.
          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

          Comment

          • Nico
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 11337

            #35
            Originally posted by Faunac8
            So Ludwig just for those who are not sure of your viewpoint should we bring AA into the team this week? ????
            Of course he will say yeeeees. He loves him; all over him like a cheap suit. Then again Ludwig has got many a player right (waiting for Ronke to take it by the scruff of an opposition player's jumper), and on his form Allir could be the greatest ruckman of all time. Watch this space.
            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

            Comment

            • Ludwig
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2007
              • 9359

              #36
              Originally posted by Nico
              Gee that's complicated and confusing. They way I figure it, if I apply the Pythagoras Theory
              I never heard of this.

              You might try using the Pythagorean Theorem if you want to get your angles right.


              Collingwood won the hitouts 65 - 14. The clearances were 35 each and Melbourne won the centre clearances by 5. So much for the importance of ruckmen. Really, why do we even bother?

              We can easily fit Dawson and Aliir in the side and Marsh can keep his spot. Just drop Naismith and Sinclair.

              Comment

              • mattybloods
                Warming the Bench
                • Jul 2016
                • 482

                #37
                Originally posted by barry
                It can't be tight for spots in a team that is 4-7. !
                It can be in a team that has won 4 of its last 5 games

                Comment

                • barry
                  Veterans List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 8499

                  #38
                  It can't be in a team that lost to hawthorn.

                  Comment

                  • swansrob
                    Senior Player
                    • May 2009
                    • 1265

                    #39
                    Originally posted by barry
                    It can't be in a team that lost to hawthorn.
                    IN: Lloyd, Reid
                    OUT: Concussions

                    Comment

                    • longmile
                      Crumber
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 3365

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Ludwig
                      I never heard of this.

                      You might try using the Pythagorean Theorem if you want to get your angles right.


                      Collingwood won the hitouts 65 - 14. The clearances were 35 each and Melbourne won the centre clearances by 5. So much for the importance of ruckmen. Really, why do we even bother?

                      We can easily fit Dawson and Aliir in the side and Marsh can keep his spot. Just drop Naismith and Sinclair.

                      If you look at the top 4 sides they all have a dominant ruckman backed up with a pinch hitter. You keep a Naismith or a firing Tippett and then use a Reid/Aliir etc to fill in

                      Comment

                      • Boddo
                        Senior Player
                        • Mar 2017
                        • 1049

                        #41
                        I don't understand the calls for no recognised ruckman. You only have to see how Naismith monstered the dogs last week against basically tall midfielders to see that if you went into the game against Nankervis with no recognised ruckman that he would rip us to pieces. Just look what happened when they had Bont in the centre square. I coulda watched it to Benny Hill music. And also could I ask how many people on here watched the last 2 reserves games, whether that be live or on a stream?

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          #42
                          Originally posted by longmile
                          If you look at the top 4 sides they all have a dominant ruckman backed up with a pinch hitter. You keep a Naismith or a firing Tippett and then use a Reid/Aliir etc to fill in
                          We'd be fine if only Sinclair could catch the ball.

                          Comment

                          • Blood Tunnel
                            Pushing for Selection
                            • Aug 2008
                            • 65

                            #43
                            Originally posted by barry
                            We'd be fine if only Sinclair could catch the ball.
                            I'd prefer he "mark" the ball!

                            Comment

                            • graemed
                              Swans2win
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 410

                              #44
                              Originally posted by SeanM
                              Rohan for Marsh. I think his pace will be useful on the MCG especially with Cunningham out..
                              I must agree with your comments about Rohan's ability to present an alternative but I am continually surprised by Marsh. He was very good on Thursday night and he has speed. He was not easily beaten in one on one contests and made excellent decisions.

                              I think Towers may be the person that will miss out for Rohan if he comes in. He is very similar in that he has marking, pace and is able to come in off the square for centre bounces.

                              Comment

                              • barry
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 8499

                                #45
                                Towers is averaging about twice as many possessions as Rohan is at the moment. No way Rohan displaces Towers. In fact Rohan needs an extended run in the two's.

                                Comment

                                Working...