Many people were sucked in by the commentary about both our ruckmen being down. But let's examine what actually happened (times are time remaining on the clock in 2nd quarter):
None of the goals by Carlton came as a result of a ruck contest, except the 1st one, when Sinclair was not able to cover Kreuzer due to being injured in the play.
Carlton kicked 4 goals in about 7 minute of clock time due mainly to high kicking efficiency and Swans turnovers and penalties.
By admitting that we need to play 2 ruckmen because of the likelihood that one of our ruckmen will be injured is a concession that we will play with a squad of 21 plus an injury substitute versus a 22 man opposition squad. Maybe we need to play 3 ruckmen to be reasonably certain that one can get through the game? Why are we playing anyone in a final series who is likely to be injured during the game. Haven't we learned from last year's final? More than anything, regardless of positional needs, we need to play fit players. Injured players only put a dent in the ice budget.
- 13:31 With Tippett already off with injury and the score 35-6, Sinclair rolls ankle in ruck contest in of defensive 50, Kreuzer left open and kicks a goal. Score 35-12
- 12:15 Towers rucking and kicks to Reid for shot on goal that falls short. 35-13
- 11:18 Curnow kicks a goal from general play. No ruck contests involved. 35-19
- 11:15 Towers wins hitout and clearance.
- 9:45 Boekhurst kicks goal after 50 mtr penalty against Franklin. 35-25
- 9:01 Towers wins ball at centre bounce, clearance and nearly kicks a goal. 36-25
- 6:07 Casboult kicks goal after penalty in marking contest outside 50 to Weitering and good kick to leading Casboult. 36-31
- 6:07 Tippett returns
- 4:40 Sinclair returns
None of the goals by Carlton came as a result of a ruck contest, except the 1st one, when Sinclair was not able to cover Kreuzer due to being injured in the play.
Carlton kicked 4 goals in about 7 minute of clock time due mainly to high kicking efficiency and Swans turnovers and penalties.
By admitting that we need to play 2 ruckmen because of the likelihood that one of our ruckmen will be injured is a concession that we will play with a squad of 21 plus an injury substitute versus a 22 man opposition squad. Maybe we need to play 3 ruckmen to be reasonably certain that one can get through the game? Why are we playing anyone in a final series who is likely to be injured during the game. Haven't we learned from last year's final? More than anything, regardless of positional needs, we need to play fit players. Injured players only put a dent in the ice budget.

Comment