#AFL Round 17 Weekly Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Markwebbos
    Veterans List
    • Jul 2016
    • 7186

    #31
    But if they lose their first final ...

    Comment

    • neilfws
      Senior Player
      • Aug 2009
      • 1826

      #32
      Confession: I went to the Giants game tonight, as my partner likes the Tigers (without being a fan as such) and this was their only Sydney outing.
      I rather enjoyed it, close exciting game but without the stress of it being your team. Gee, Tigers fans are an entitled bunch though. Never heard so many complaints about completely fair and legitimate things like your opponent tackling, or contesting the ball. It was worth going just to hear them fall silent at the end

      Comment

      • barry
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 8499

        #33
        Tigers produce another super-human 4th quarter. 4 goals to 1.
        Doesn't seem natural to me.

        - - - Updated - - -

        I get the feeling the giants are better off without Patton.

        Comment

        • rb4x
          Regular in the Side
          • Dec 2007
          • 968

          #34
          One comment I saw recently was that each Melbourne team has to play one home game at Etihad. Building on that why can we not have a rule that each non MCG tenant has to play one home game each year at the MCG against a non MCG tenant. This would go some way in negating the finals favouritism that each MCG tenant enjoys seeing that it looks like the Grand Final will be played at the MCG for the next one hundred years or so. Still would mean more travel for non Victorian teams but would start to level the playing field a little.

          Comment

          • liz
            Veteran
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 16778

            #35
            Originally posted by rb4x
            One comment I saw recently was that each Melbourne team has to play one home game at Etihad. Building on that why can we not have a rule that each non MCG tenant has to play one home game each year at the MCG against a non MCG tenant. This would go some way in negating the finals favouritism that each MCG tenant enjoys seeing that it looks like the Grand Final will be played at the MCG for the next one hundred years or so. Still would mean more travel for non Victorian teams but would start to level the playing field a little.
            I'm not sure why the non MCG tenants need to play MCG games against other non-tenants. There are plenty of away games in each team's schedule for each non-MCG tenant to play several games at the MCG each year (with priority to be awarded to those who finished the prior season high on the ladder). I think we got to play four or five games at the MCG last season but this year it was cut to just the two, and we were drawn to play an MCG tenant (Richmond) at Etihad.

            Comment

            • barry
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 8499

              #36
              The MCG is a political hotbed in Victoria. No logic when it's treated like a religion.

              The MCG trust must be the most politically astute people on earth. Has any other patch of grass and concrete ever been elevated to such high levels before.

              - - - Updated - - -

              Let them pray to their fake dietie.

              Comment

              • stevoswan
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2014
                • 8560

                #37
                Originally posted by Markwebbos
                But if they lose their first final ...
                We can only hope......

                Comment

                • stevoswan
                  Veterans List
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 8560

                  #38
                  I see Nic Nat looks to have done his 'good' knee. Could well be season over.....

                  Comment

                  • YvonneH
                    Senior Player
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 1141

                    #39
                    Originally posted by stevoswan
                    I see Nic Nat looks to have done his 'good' knee. Could well be season over.....
                    Don't like to see that happen to any player regardless who he plays for.

                    Comment

                    • ugg
                      Can you feel it?
                      Site Admin
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15970

                      #40
                      Thanks to Fremantle, we are 4th.
                      Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                      Reserves WIKI -
                      Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8560

                        #41
                        Originally posted by YvonneH
                        Don't like to see that happen to any player regardless who he plays for.
                        Agree....

                        Comment

                        Working...