Changes Round 21 Demons v Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hotpotato
    Senior Player
    • Jun 2014
    • 2261

    #61
    Anyone OUT?

    Comment

    • longmile
      Crumber
      • Apr 2011
      • 3360

      #62
      Still no word on O'Riordan and Grundy...

      Comment

      • Hotpotato
        Senior Player
        • Jun 2014
        • 2261

        #63
        Swans $3.00
        Dees $1.40

        Bookies must know something we don’t.
        Dees haven’t beaten anyone in the top 9.
        Gawn didn’t train .

        Comment

        • CureTheSane
          Carpe Noctem
          • Jan 2003
          • 5032

          #64
          I'm not a punter, but tempted by those odds
          The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

          Comment

          • Aprilbr
            Senior Player
            • Oct 2016
            • 1803

            #65
            Also, they are saying that Reid is still 3 weeks away. It’s hard to see him back now before season’s end.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • barry
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 8499

              #66
              Originally posted by Aprilbr
              Also, they are saying that Reid is still 3 weeks away. It’s hard to see him back now before season’s end.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              We made the mistake of not bringing Reid straight back into a grand final in 2014 (or 2016, can't recall exactly).
              Pray we don't make that mistake again.

              Comment

              • Markwebbos
                Veterans List
                • Jul 2016
                • 7186

                #67
                2016
                X played instead

                Comment

                • Beerman
                  Regular in the Side
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 823

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Hotpotato
                  Swans $3.00
                  Dees $1.40

                  Bookies must know something we don’t.
                  Dees haven’t beaten anyone in the top 9.
                  Gawn didn’t train .
                  Yes - Dees have an in-form midfield, and the best ruck in the league. We don't. Also, our best player doesn't train either, so I wouldn't read too much into Gawn walking laps.

                  We will be smashed. 30+ points.

                  Comment

                  • Markwebbos
                    Veterans List
                    • Jul 2016
                    • 7186

                    #69
                    We’ve got a good record against Melbourne, but if their midfield gets in top, as is likely, it could get ugly.

                    They are weak in defence and on the outside.

                    Going in fearing the worst but hoping for the best.

                    Comment

                    • Plugger1300
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 310

                      #70
                      Odds are spot on
                      Doesn't mean we can't win though

                      But in my opinion they have priced the game correctly

                      Comment

                      • CureTheSane
                        Carpe Noctem
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 5032

                        #71
                        Reid comes back.
                        We lose.
                        Chorus of "why did the Swans bring back half done players"
                        Repeat with Hanners etc.

                        To be honest there have been times where I've advocated playing players who were not fully fit, and I was wrong.
                        Generally it was done out of sentiment in a final.

                        But no longer.
                        I now see the merit in the argument others have had that you only ever play fully fit and match ready players.

                        Reid - seaosn
                        Hanners - only play him if we need to build his value, otherwise why would we play him based on recent form?
                        The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                        Comment

                        • Plugger46
                          Senior Player
                          • Apr 2003
                          • 3674

                          #72
                          Originally posted by CureTheSane
                          Reid comes back.
                          We lose.
                          Chorus of "why did the Swans bring back half done players"
                          Repeat with Hanners etc.

                          To be honest there have been times where I've advocated playing players who were not fully fit, and I was wrong.
                          Generally it was done out of sentiment in a final.

                          But no longer.
                          I now see the merit in the argument others have had that you only ever play fully fit and match ready players.

                          Reid - seaosn
                          Hanners - only play him if we need to build his value, otherwise why would we play him based on recent form?
                          I think it has to be a case by case basis. If we stuck to that, Buddy would be sitting in the stands at the moment.
                          Bloods

                          "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                          Comment

                          • CureTheSane
                            Carpe Noctem
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 5032

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Plugger46
                            I think it has to be a case by case basis. If we stuck to that, Buddy would be sitting in the stands at the moment.
                            There may be merit in that.
                            I'd hate for him to be still playing with injury next year.
                            The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                            Comment

                            • KTigers
                              Senior Player
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 2499

                              #74
                              Originally posted by Plugger46
                              I think it has to be a case by case basis. If we stuck to that, Buddy would be sitting in the stands at the moment.
                              Not really sure how injured Buddy actually is. He just kicked 6.4 (and set up the Ronke & Kennedy goals with his insanely good field kicking) and pretty much won a game by himself against a fairly decent opponent.

                              Comment

                              • Markwebbos
                                Veterans List
                                • Jul 2016
                                • 7186

                                #75
                                Originally posted by Plugger46
                                I think it has to be a case by case basis. If we stuck to that, Buddy would be sitting in the stands at the moment.
                                I reckon look at the team and whether it would be better with / without Hanners, Reid etc. Plus whether they can last a whole game.

                                I reckon Reid would have gone better than Xavier in the 2016 GF and broken Hanners is still better than our worst.

                                Comment

                                Working...