My favourite is the argument that the MCG is the only stadium "big enough" to hold the GF (for 40 years). You only have
to look at the list of stadiums used to host AFL games that are now no longer with us, or not being used for games to see just how fleeting
the stadium business can be. Waverley, AAMI, Subiaco, ANZ, a litany of Melbourne suburban grounds, wherever the Bears used to play.
These places come and go.
There will be new stadiums built and knocked down between now and 2057. Sure the SCG, Adelaide Oval, Gabba & MCG will probably still
be around then, but I'll be very surprised if any of the others are still around in 40 years. People seem to forget the capacity of ANZ during
the 2000 Olympics was 130,000. The extra stands holding 55,000 seats were for an event that ran for two weeks. Then they pulled them down.
As I said, it's a very fleeting business, the stadium game. So the "big enough" argument is ridiculous, and even more so when you consider
what the population of Australia is likely to be in 40 years.
to look at the list of stadiums used to host AFL games that are now no longer with us, or not being used for games to see just how fleeting
the stadium business can be. Waverley, AAMI, Subiaco, ANZ, a litany of Melbourne suburban grounds, wherever the Bears used to play.
These places come and go.
There will be new stadiums built and knocked down between now and 2057. Sure the SCG, Adelaide Oval, Gabba & MCG will probably still
be around then, but I'll be very surprised if any of the others are still around in 40 years. People seem to forget the capacity of ANZ during
the 2000 Olympics was 130,000. The extra stands holding 55,000 seats were for an event that ran for two weeks. Then they pulled them down.
As I said, it's a very fleeting business, the stadium game. So the "big enough" argument is ridiculous, and even more so when you consider
what the population of Australia is likely to be in 40 years.


Comment