2019 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wolftone57
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2008
    • 5835

    #46
    Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
    Look Mate , All going well this kid won’t play a game this year . He’s been Brought in as back up . As you said he’s not a defender, unfortunately it is now a week before the season ; after both the national draft and rookie draft have taken place , so it looks as though we took the best tall player available , regardless of his preferred position. A lot of young talls start out in one half the ground and end up playing most of their careers in the other half. You’re complaining he’s not a defender. Reid hasn’t strung enough good footy together at either end of the ground to suggest where he is best suited. And Mccartin has proven he can take a grab and compete and has a tank to boot. His best position could be in any third of the ground at this stage , or even all three. I’m just offering some solutions to your obvious displeasure at the swans taking this kid in the preseason SSP as he is more of a forward/ruck . Which other star defender do you think we should have taken instead wolf ?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I did not complain he is not a defender. I remarked he was not a defender. There is a big difference. He might be another Reg, make the move back and be incredibly successful. But that takes time. What I did point out however was how crap as a defender Reid is.

    Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • Melbourne_Blood
      Senior Player
      • May 2010
      • 3312

      #47
      Originally posted by wolftone57
      I did not complain he is not a defender. I remarked he was not a defender. There is a big difference. He might be another Reg, make the move back and be incredibly successful. But that takes time. What I did point out however was how crap as a defender Reid is.

      Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk
      I disagree. I think he has performed decently as a defender at Times and if god forbid we need to put someone from our front half down there this year at times I think Reid could do that job. Is it ideal, no.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • wolftone57
        Veterans List
        • Aug 2008
        • 5835

        #48
        Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
        Look Mate , All going well this kid won’t play a game this year . He’s been Brought in as back up . As you said he’s not a defender, unfortunately it is now a week before the season ; after both the national draft and rookie draft have taken place , so it looks as though we took the best tall player available , regardless of his preferred position. A lot of young talls start out in one half the ground and end up playing most of their careers in the other half. You’re complaining he’s not a defender. Reid hasn’t strung enough good footy together at either end of the ground to suggest where he is best suited. And Mccartin has proven he can take a grab and compete and has a tank to boot. His best position could be in any third of the ground at this stage , or even all three. I’m just offering some solutions to your obvious displeasure at the swans taking this kid in the preseason SSP as he is more of a forward/ruck . Which other star defender do you think we should have taken instead wolf ?


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        We are looking for a quick solution to a gap was my point. If Reg gets injured there is a definite gap. Maibaum looked poised to fill that gap this year should it have occurred. What this move does is bring a young bloke that would have to be trained to fill that gap at short notice into the equation.

        If we are filling the Ruck gap then it is understandable. But to fill a key back gap? Probably not at this stage. I don't think McCartin is, far enough along in his development to take a key back position either. He is, a good player who has also played forward and not back. He will be good fir us no matter what end of the ground he plays but again given time. To fill a key back position, especially playing on the monsters, is incredibly hard. It is probably the hardest spot on a footy field and many young backs have been destroyed. Just ask Liam Jones, Harris-Andrews, Zac Dawson.

        I am very aware this is spur of the moment, players recruiting on the run. But generally when you have a gap you try to get someone who can fill that gap. Obviously the identified gap was ruck. I'm not going to bother saying forward because the bloke kicked 9goals in 13 games last year in the VFL. A key forward needs to do better than that. Probably filling the just in case Naismith and Cameron don't get up.

        Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • S.S. Bleeder
          Senior Player
          • Sep 2014
          • 2165

          #49
          Originally posted by liz
          I reckon the signing of McLean is as much cover for the vacated Tippett spot as for Maibaum. The club possibly thought it was already a little light on for ruck/forward options, and that's been made starker by the slower than expected recovery of Naismith and the knock that Cameron took to his knee in the GWS practice game, the severity of which we (outside the club) know little.
          Didn't we recruit Cameron when we knew that Tippett was finishing/finished? If it was to cover Tippett we should have brought in another ruck in the last two draft periods. Maybe it is more to do with the rule changes and us underestimating the importance of rucks under this rule at the last draft.

          - - - Updated - - -

          Originally posted by wolftone57
          Reid can play back can he? I have yet to see any evidence of any success of that move. In fact the last time he played back for a whole match he cot 4 goals kicked on him.

          McCartin is still not developed to play back. Not strong enough against key forwards that Grundy has to play on.

          Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk
          Reidy okay as a KPD. He's been a swingman ever since I can remember.

          Comment

          • Ludwig
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2007
            • 9359

            #50
            It's been typical that we've given our KPP draftees some time a both ends of the ground to help diversify their games and see where they are best suited. Maibaum had played some time forward as a junior and we tried him forward a few games, but he didn't do very well, so settled on being a defender.

            Toby Pink has played forward, back and in the ruck as a junior. He probably won't make the grade anyway, but if he he does, I think his best chance is as a defender.

            I wouldn't mind seeing Amartey given some time as a defender this year. I think he can be come a true versatile utility KPP.

            McCartin and Blakey are both well suited to playing forward, which could close the door on some of those other potential forwards, like Amartey, and now McLean, unless they can handle playing as a KPD and ruckman.

            I'm hoping that Amartey will turn into a Justin Westoff type who can turn up and play any part of the ground.

            With key forwards seemingly getting taller with every new draft, we could use a taller type of key defender.

            Comment

            • bloodspirit
              Clubman
              • Apr 2015
              • 4448

              #51
              I've had a couple of thoughts about recruitment: I found myself reflecting on something I read about our recruitment of JPK a little while ago - actually I just found the article, here it is: https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/...18-p4zg3l.html. What emerges from this article is that it was actually JPK's agent, Paul Connors, who put JPK on our radar when he answered Andrew Ireland's question about who was the best player on his (i.e. Connors') list who wasn't getting a game.

              This leads me to think:

              * agents have some (no doubt variable and not unlimited) influence in where their players go

              * players that one thinks might be off limits/out of reach, may not be.

              This year we seem to have some money to spend and, in my opinion, our priority is probably to get another elite midfielder the right age (depending of course on how our season plays out and how the likes of Heeney, Mills, Florent, Papley, Clarke et. al. do with more midfield time). Who might we be able to get? Jack Macrae? Brad Crouch? I wonder how much time our recruiters are thinking about this and what answers they are coming up with....

              The Bulldogs have a really strong midfield group and don't seem to be an entirely happy club. They also have a fair bit of money tied up with Tom Boyd and, to a much lesser extent, Josh Schache. Can we target one of their mids? If we have to trade, what do we have to give? This is the advantage of getting a free agent but Stephen Coniglio is the only really exciting one. Melbourne have an amazing list and may not be able to continue to afford everyone. I seem to have a bit of time to speculate this afternoon....
              All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

              Comment

              • stevoswan
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2014
                • 8545

                #52
                Naismith setback.....bummer.

                Knee surgery to delay Sydney ruckman’s return - AFL.com.au

                Explains why Sinclair was withdrawn from the last JLT match. The article also says Sinclair is expected to sign a new contract for 2-3 years in the next few weeks. Wise move....
                Last edited by stevoswan; 22 March 2019, 07:33 PM.

                Comment

                • aguy
                  Senior Player
                  • Mar 2014
                  • 1324

                  #53
                  We so needed preuss rather than Melbourne. He would have been our next generation ruck

                  Comment

                  • Aprilbr
                    Senior Player
                    • Oct 2016
                    • 1803

                    #54
                    Originally posted by stevoswan
                    Naismith setback.....bummer.

                    Knee surgery to delay Sydney ruckman’s return - AFL.com.au

                    Explains why Sinclair was withdrawn from the last JLT match. The article also says Sinclair is expected to sign a new contract for 2-3 years in the next few weeks. Wise move....
                    Very disappointing news that Naismith will be delayed further. Great news about Sinclair re-signing though!

                    Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • AB Swannie
                      Senior Player
                      • Mar 2017
                      • 1579

                      #55
                      The 3 year contract extension Naismith was given last year was always a surprise.

                      Comment

                      • Blood Fever
                        Veterans List
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 4040

                        #56
                        Originally posted by AB Swannie
                        The 3 year contract extension Naismith was given last year was always a surprise.
                        Not really - when fully fit, he is our best ruckman and likely not to be on big dollars

                        Comment

                        • Auntie.Gerald
                          Veterans List
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 6474

                          #57
                          Naismith would be on peanuts in the realm of $ for an afl player
                          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                          Comment

                          • 707
                            Veterans List
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 6204

                            #58
                            Originally posted by aguy
                            We so needed preuss rather than Melbourne. He would have been our next generation ruck
                            Preuss deciding to transfer to Melbourne was one of the most perplexing career moves I've seen. Was stuck behind an ageing Goldy at Norf but go to the Dees to get stuck behind Gawn who is in the prime of his career.

                            Comment

                            • Ludwig
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 9359

                              #59
                              Originally posted by AB Swannie
                              The 3 year contract extension Naismith was given last year was always a surprise.
                              I said last year that Naismith should only be offered a rookie contract as he was unlikely to play senior footy this year. He's never shown that he can stay fit for any reasonable period of time.

                              It also shows that me should have given Cameron more AFL exposure last year when he was in great NEAFL form.

                              Comment

                              • caj23
                                Senior Player
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 2462

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Blood Fever
                                Not really - when fully fit, he is our best ruckman and likely not to be on big dollars
                                When is he fully fit?

                                He’s played 28 senior games heading into his 6th season

                                Comment

                                Working...