Absolutely. Though they are a bit different because they aren't (or shouldn't be) said in the heat of a frustrated moment. If players do post on social media without putting their brains into gear first, they are likely to get themselves into trouble (as is anyone else). I have a little more sympathy for tired players out on the ground who are frustrated at their opponent getting a free kick, even if it's there.
#AFL Round 8 Swans vs Dons Fri 10-May at SCG #AFLSwansDons @sydneyswans
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
As a woman (in case you hadn't guessed) I actually thought the element of demeaning women was somewhat overplayed in this instance. The comment came in the context of Rampe complaining he hadn't heard the play on call. It's a fact that girls have higher pitched and softer voices than burly umpires. I didn't see it as derogatory to make that observation. Having a high or soft voice is neither a good thing nor a bad thing. It just is. I did think it was a bit petulant towards the umpire, though, and not necessary. He has a bit of form in this department - remember the "coffee with Gil" comment he made last season. I know we laughed at the time, but it showed disrespect towards the umpire.
Half the issue is having the umpires miked up. I am sure umpires have been on the receiving end of far more abusive comments in the past, and to an extent they need to have thick skins and understand players get frustrated. But players now have to understand that anything they say will be heard by anyone watching the game on TV.Comment
-
Ha, yes.
I think his game commentary is (or at least was, I can't listen to the ads now) excellent. I also think he hosted an excellent Saturday AFL discussion show on the ABC and generally did a good job facilitating discussion on Offsiders.
I have listened to/watched him in all of his present commercial media platforms and can't keep with it. I think he's succumbed to the boys club.Comment
-
Case closed.
This is what umpire Chamberlain told Gerard Whateley.
Category: | Herald Sun
“I don’t think (Rampe) intentionally shook the post. I don’t know what he was trying to do but I don’t think he was trying to shake the post because he would have shaken the bejesus out of it...
The question has remained unanswered over what would actually happen if another player in 2019 attempted to climb the post, but Chamberlain revealed that incredibly, a free kick would still likely not be paid in the same circumstance.
“The clear instruction is if you see a player climb the post, but not shaking the bejesus out of it, you would instruct that player to get off post and then if they fail to follow that instruction to get down you pay a free kick on the goal line,” he said on Whateley.Comment
-
Agree. Heard that Chamberlain interview with Whateley today. However the likes of Whateley are making the assumption Rampe intended to the shake the goalpost when he climbed it because it shook slightly as a result. That equals to guilt in their books, without taking into consideration Rampe got down soon as he was intructed by the umpire to do so and the fact it had no bearing on Myers kick whatsoever being out of range. All other INTENATIONAL goal shaking incidents in the past ALL occurred when player was having set shot at close range.Comment
-
Agree. Heard that Chamberlain interview with Whateley today. However the likes of Whateley are making the assumption Rampe intended to the shake the goalpost when he climbed it because it shook slightly as a result. That equals to guilt in their books, without taking into consideration Rampe got down soon as he was intructed by the umpire to do so and the fact it had no bearing on Myers kick whatsoever being out of range. All other INTENATIONAL goal shaking incidents in the past ALL occurred when player was having set shot at close range.Comment
Comment