Tweet
[QUOTE=mcs;801877]I guess some people have a heart and want to try and minimise the damage from the pandemic.... not simply leave the door open for the wolves to eat whatever they want in a dog eat dog world.
[QUOTE]
Thats the other extreme. But with Jobkeeper, its frame of usefulness is if the pandemic lasted 6 months or less. After that its actually has a negative value, and you are far better putting the same money into JobSeeker.
(ie, its far better for employee's to transition to actual jobs than keep them waiting for zombie job that may not actually be viable)
Rushed implementation (fair enough), but lack of refinement and reviews has allowed the vultures to find its weaknesses and rort it.
[QUOTE]
Thats the other extreme. But with Jobkeeper, its frame of usefulness is if the pandemic lasted 6 months or less. After that its actually has a negative value, and you are far better putting the same money into JobSeeker.
(ie, its far better for employee's to transition to actual jobs than keep them waiting for zombie job that may not actually be viable)
Agree about the rorting of jobkeeper however - but that is not necessarily because the concept itself is bad, but a reflection of poor implementation by the Feds.
Comment