Round 1: Brisbane v Swans @ the Gabba

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Auntie.Gerald
    Veterans List
    • Oct 2009
    • 6480

    It's is the most conclusive answer to the smallest data set I have ever witnessed.

    Love the enthusiasm.

    But super exciting start.
    "be tough, only when it gets tough"

    Comment

    • Ludwig
      Veterans List
      • Apr 2007
      • 9359

      Originally posted by bloodspirit
      I'm interested to know if AG will sign off on that?
      I never post anything without getting prior approval from Auntie Gerald.

      Comment

      • dejavoodoo44
        Veterans List
        • Apr 2015
        • 8661

        Originally posted by Markwebbos
        According to something I read, it may have been RB.

        Sydney v Brisbane - The Mongrel Review - The Mongrel Punt
        I just watched the second and third quarters again, and there certainly wasn't a single player tagging Neale. It was almost the opposite, in that, at ball ups, there were a wide range of players standing next to Neale: Kennedy, Parker, Mills, Rowbottom, Florent and even Blakey.

        Comment

        • royboy42
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2006
          • 2078

          Originally posted by baskin
          I won't be sold on this rule until someone can explain why Braeden Campbell's goal wasn't allowed and how that is good for the game. The commentators said it was because he went inside the protected area. Does that mean the end of all the long range goals from the likes of Buddy and Dawson from hand offs? I don't think that is such a great thing.
          Can anyone enlighten me please?
          I thought the protected area rule only applied to the side without the ball?

          Comment

          • Bloods05
            Senior Player
            • Oct 2008
            • 1641

            Originally posted by royboy42
            I thought the protected area rule only applied to the side without the ball?
            Exactly. It seemed a little bizarre last night. I would love to see just 2 or 3 consecutive seasons with no rule changes.

            Comment

            • Markwebbos
              Veterans List
              • Jul 2016
              • 7186

              Originally posted by TheBloods
              He was solid. Just didnt stand out to me. Assisted in a few goals and laid a few strong tackles but didnt have much of an impact. Not easy playing with a knee complaint and i would know.
              117 SC points, 11 score involvements. Were you watching Hawks v Bombers?

              Comment

              • TheBloods
                Suspended by the MRP
                • Feb 2020
                • 2047

                Originally posted by Markwebbos
                117 SC points, 11 score involvements. Were you watching Hawks v Bombers?
                You say im obsessed with him. Didnt mention his name. You brought him up. I said he was solid. Not a stand out. Jury’s out on his midfield craft plus he was playing injured. He’ll miss this week and come back through the VFL. Who knows might do him good.

                Comment

                • AB Swannie
                  Senior Player
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 1579

                  Originally posted by TheBloods
                  You say im obsessed with him. Didnt mention his name. You brought him up. I said he was solid. Not a stand out. Jury’s out on his midfield craft plus he was playing injured. He’ll miss this week and come back through the VFL. Who knows might do him good.
                  Nope. Jury returned a while ago and he’s good.

                  Comment

                  • mcs
                    Travelling Swannie!!
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8168

                    Originally posted by TheBloods
                    You say im obsessed with him. Didnt mention his name. You brought him up. I said he was solid. Not a stand out. Jury’s out on his midfield craft plus he was playing injured. He’ll miss this week and come back through the VFL. Who knows might do him good.
                    Lol, your judge, jury and executioner sent him to the gallows 6 months ago.Now he doesn't have 'midfield craft' - or should we file such crap alongside your other qualitative nonsense like 'lacking AFL class's or 'not AFL standard's from previous posts.

                    I'd love to know the back story behind the blinkers....

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Originally posted by Markwebbos
                    117 SC points, 11 score involvements. Were you watching Hawks v Bombers?
                    Wouldn't matter how good a game he had, will never be satisfied..... Simple as that.

                    Would need to kick 12, have 19 tackles, 47 hitouts and 8 clearances, plus 73 possession before someone might even concede a cm of ground.

                    It's truly bizarre.
                    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                    Comment

                    • mcs
                      Travelling Swannie!!
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 8168

                      Originally posted by Bloods05
                      Exactly. It seemed a little bizarre last night. I would love to see just 2 or 3 consecutive seasons with no rule changes.
                      We could only dream for such an occurrence. I think this year's rule changes in totem will be a positive, but only time will tell.

                      Hope we don't see too much of that nonsense we saw several times last night of them calling back play when they've played on but just not quite from the right spot... They want to speed up the play but in the same breath be overly pedantic.

                      I'm not sure I like just how much players can arc off the mark before play on is called. But that'll settle down I expect.
                      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                      Comment

                      • Bexl
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 817

                        Originally posted by AB Swannie
                        Nope. Jury returned a while ago and he’s good.
                        I don't know why ANYONE responds to The Bloods constant criticism of Rowbottom. He clearly is just trolling.

                        Comment

                        • Vonsteinman
                          Warming the Bench
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 366

                          Originally posted by Bexl
                          I don't know why ANYONE responds to The Bloods constant criticism of Rowbottom. He clearly is just trolling.
                          Spot on

                          Comment

                          • Markwebbos
                            Veterans List
                            • Jul 2016
                            • 7186

                            I’m stopping

                            Comment

                            • dimelb
                              pr. dim-melb; m not f
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 6889

                              Originally posted by Bexl
                              I don't know why ANYONE responds to The Bloods constant criticism of Rowbottom. He clearly is just trolling.
                              He is neither trolling nor stirring.

                              He is like anyone else on the board stating his opinion. If you or several others don't agree with him don't read him.
                              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                              Comment

                              • 707
                                Veterans List
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 6204

                                Originally posted by dimelb
                                He is neither trolling nor stirring.

                                He is like anyone else on the board stating his opinion. If you or several others don't agree with him don't read him.
                                Read who? :-)

                                Comment

                                Working...