If the SCG Trust want to improve the home ground advantage, consider that the Swans played the same song after every goal in 1987. Hearing this song 36 times in a game gave Kevin Sheedy nightmares.
Let's Get LOUD aka the match day experience thread (split thread)
Collapse
X
-
-
Anyone who has been to an NBA game in recent years will have seen what a day at the footy will look and sound like in the future.
This "fan engagement" thing is yet another US import and it's not pretty. Watch the membership fees go up every year as we'll be
expected to pay extra for this "enhanced game day experience".Comment
-
I know, it's such a bull@@@@ concept, isn't it. Do they really think that opposition players, will somehow be put off their game, by hearing twenty seconds of Australian Crawl? When actually, if you consider the demographics involved, the reaction is more likely to be, "yeah, whatever, boomer".
However I'd have to question if anyone found Saturdays 'entertainment' as entertaining. Does anyone think corporate sponsors yelling at you while baby shark is blaring over the speakers is a good time?Comment
-
Just for context, I'm probably one of the more outspoken on this issue in this thread and I'm in my mid to late 20s. I don't think its anything to do with age, it's more to do with people who go to the game for the sport and the natural atmosphere v people who go to the game for an 'entertainment experience'.
However I'd have to question if anyone found Saturdays 'entertainment' as entertaining. Does anyone think corporate sponsors yelling at you while baby shark is blaring over the speakers is a good time?
Unless they think our players are so shallow, that they will try harder, just to hear 20 seconds of their personalised song. I doubt that anyone in the football department actually thinks that. More somebody in the marketing department trying to justify themselves.
- - - Updated - - -
Just for context, I'm probably one of the more outspoken on this issue in this thread and I'm in my mid to late 20s. I don't think its anything to do with age, it's more to do with people who go to the game for the sport and the natural atmosphere v people who go to the game for an 'entertainment experience'.
However I'd have to question if anyone found Saturdays 'entertainment' as entertaining. Does anyone think corporate sponsors yelling at you while baby shark is blaring over the speakers is a good time?Comment
-
Just for context, I'm probably one of the more outspoken on this issue in this thread and I'm in my mid to late 20s. I don't think its anything to do with age, it's more to do with people who go to the game for the sport and the natural atmosphere v people who go to the game for an 'entertainment experience'.
However I'd have to question if anyone found Saturdays 'entertainment' as entertaining. Does anyone think corporate sponsors yelling at you while baby shark is blaring over the speakers is a good time?
they went to the Adele concert, they clog up the harbour foreshore on NYE to see the pretty colours of the fireworks, they have tickets for
"Hamilton" and a booking for that new Peruvian-Thai fusion restaurant in Surry Hills. If it's new and bright and shiny, it's for them. They've
heard of "Buddy", but don't know his surname. And they couldn't tell Luke Parker from Clive Palmer. They are the target audience of the Fan
Engagement Dept. At best they'll buy a three game membership and get bored and wander off looking for something else shiny sometime
during the third quarter of game 2. And meanwhile we (and our hearing) have to pay for the clubs quest to "engage" with them.Last edited by KTigers; 30 March 2021, 12:53 PM.Comment
-
KTigers:'If the SCG Trust want to improve the home ground advantage, consider that the Swans played the same song after every goal in 1987. Hearing this song 36 times in a game gave Kevin Sheedy nightmares.'
That ridiculous racket in 1987 stopped me going to the football back then too! Three goals in a row was a nightmare of 'Yay Sydney, Yay Sydney' from an old school wall of speakers, and the dancing girls.Comment
-
Did anybody get the email survey about the game from the AFL? I kept getting kicked out of it so I was hoping that there were 10 000 other Swans fans complaining about the stupid new 'entertainment'
There is an expression for those people. It's theatre goers. They attend "events". They go to see EPL teams play exhibition games at ANZ,
they went to the Adele concert, they clog up the harbour foreshore on NYE to see the pretty colours of the fireworks, they have tickets for
"Hamilton". If it's new and bright and shiny, it's for them. They've heard of "Buddy", but don't know his surname. And they couldn't tell Luke
Parker from Clive Palmer. They are the target audience of the Fan Engagement Dept. And we (and our hearing) have to pay for the clubs
quest to "engage" with them.Life's not a spectator sportComment
-
Did anybody get the email survey about the game from the AFL? I kept getting kicked out of it so I was hoping that there were 10 000 other Swans fans complaining about the stupid new 'entertainment'
As a footy-loving Swans fan who is counting down the days until I can see Hamilton as I sit here listening to the soundtrack yet again, I take offense to your statement!!!!Comment
-
Surprise surprise i dont agree with you lot about the music. It annoyed me but if you think we have it tough having to put up with 30 seconds of blaring music while going to footy games you should spare a thought for those in the Northern hemisphere who havent been to a sporting event in over a year !
One thing i agree with is the individualised songs for each player. Wtf? Doesnt make any sense and i didnt even notice that is what the SCG was going for with the exception of Errol Gulden. What song is gonna play if Kennedy kicks a goal ? The US national anthem ?? Stupid.Comment
-
Yeah, I suppose I'm making the mistake of judging musical taste by generation. But I fit into the boomer category, and I find Australian Crawl pretty lame, so I was assuming that many players, who are under thirty, would find playing their song, Errol, even lamer. I certainly don't think it would give our players "an extra edge".
Unless they think our players are so shallow, that they will try harder, just to hear 20 seconds of their personalised song. I doubt that anyone in the football department actually thinks that. More somebody in the marketing department trying to justify themselves.
- - - Updated - - -
Hopefully, Baby Shark, is not a player selection?
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
KTigers:'If the SCG Trust want to improve the home ground advantage, consider that the Swans played the same song after every goal in 1987. Hearing this song 36 times in a game gave Kevin Sheedy nightmares.'
That ridiculous racket in 1987 stopped me going to the football back then too! Three goals in a row was a nightmare of 'Yay Sydney, Yay Sydney' from an old school wall of speakers, and the dancing girls.
Personally, I don't think we really need any of that. A replay of the goal on the big scoreboard is good enough."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
Surprise surprise i dont agree with you lot about the music. It annoyed me but if you think we have it tough having to put up with 30 seconds of blaring music while going to footy games you should spare a thought for those in the Northern hemisphere who havent been to a sporting event in over a year !
.Comment
Comment