Changes for round 15 v Port Adelaide

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blood Fever
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 4043

    #31
    Originally posted by Mark26
    I think it was more than mentally switching off. I suspect that we were physically tired and if anything it showed that we needed this bye. Our squad is still relatively young. Like everyone on here, I was hoping that we'd win against the Hawks. Nonetheless, we've surpassed expectations up until this point. Time to rest, regroup and come back fired up for the second half of the season.
    Agree. Hawks got to play us after we had 2 6 day breaks. Pretty sure the other sides coming off the bye played each other. Bad timing for us. Might be unavoidable but looks like poor fixturing, although maths not my strong suit.

    Comment

    • TheBloods
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Feb 2020
      • 2047

      #32
      Originally posted by Blood Fever
      Agree. Hawks got to play us after we had 2 6 day breaks. Pretty sure the other sides coming off the bye played each other. Bad timing for us. Might be unavoidable but looks like poor fixturing, although maths not my strong suit.
      You are on the money , the entire thing was a rort

      Who the @@@@ fixtures a team off two 6 day breaks against a team coming off the bye ? Total fix

      and dont get me started on the green muppets

      Comment

      • Bangalore Swans
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Mar 2021
        • 1049

        #33
        Originally posted by Roadrunner
        Why would you drop Hewett ahead of Fox? Poor guy was dreadful- that kick out of bounds on the full was shocking!

        However, I agree with your Ins.

        As for Bangalore: players can get emotional when the umpiring is so inconsistent. Paps plays with a lot of emotion and does need to curb his tendency to question/ criticise umpires for the team’s benefit, but using your own logic, you would punish the team more if you drop him! Get real.
        I’m dead set real. I can appreciate the emotion Papley plays with. Franklin plays with emotion as well. Franklin does not descend into umpire abuse when a decision goes against him.

        I’m staggered that the majority of the Red and White community believes that it’s perfectly acceptable for Papley to abuse umpires and give away umpiring abuse free kicks. The logic being that umpires are the enemy and deserve whatever Papley dishes out.

        I can accept free kicks being given away if someone is going for the ball or doesn’t execute a tackle properly. Umpire abuse free kicks I can’t tolerate because they hurt the team for no other reason than selfish petulance.

        The coaching staff need to get this petulance out of Papley’s game. Papley behaviour towards officials is not improving.

        Papley needs stronger consequences and a two week stint as the medical sub with the associated job around the boundary at the end of the game may refocus him.

        I want Papley to stop worrying about what umpires are doing and focus on doing his job and being that amazing inspiring player that we all enjoy watching play the game.

        Comment

        • Meg
          Go Swannies!
          Site Admin
          • Aug 2011
          • 4828

          #34
          Changes for round 15 v Port Adelaide

          Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
          I can appreciate the emotion Papley plays with. Franklin plays with emotion as well. Franklin does not descend into umpire abuse when a decision goes against him.


          I can accept free kicks being given away if someone is going for the ball or doesn’t execute a tackle properly. Umpire abuse free kicks I can’t tolerate because they hurt the team for no other reason than selfish petulance.

          The coaching staff need to get this petulance out of Papley’s game.
          I agree with those parts of your post that I have edited to leave in above. I think the comparison with Buddy is a good one: he shows his disagreement with an umpire’s decision by a look of surprise and a shake of the head - and then gets on with the game. Something I admire him for.

          I hope the co-captains speak to Papley about this (as well as the coaching staff) because it costs the team as a whole.

          But there is no chance Papley will be dropped for this ..... and I certainly don’t support that part of your posts.

          Comment

          • Blood Fever
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2007
            • 4043

            #35
            Originally posted by Meg
            I agree with those parts of your post that I have edited to leave in above. I think the comparison with Buddy is a good one: he shows his disagreement with an umpire’s decision by a look of surprise and a shake of the head - and then gets on with the game. Something I admire him for.

            I hope the co-captains speak to Papley about this (as well as the coaching staff) because it costs the team as a whole.

            But there is no chance Papley will be dropped for this ..... and I certainly don’t support that part of your posts.
            Why are we indulging this bogus identity?

            Comment

            • Agent 86
              Senior Player
              • Aug 2004
              • 1686

              #36
              Changes for round 15 v Port Adelaide

              Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
              i’m staggered that the majority of the Red and White community believes that it’s perfectly acceptable for Papley to abuse umpires and give away umpiring abuse free kicks.

              Papley needs stronger consequences and a two week stint as the medical sub with the associated job around the boundary at the end of the game may refocus
              Okay , it’s not okay to lose your head against the umpires. It doesn’t get you anywhere. But Papley’s tantrum was not particularly outrageous and didn’t cost us anything in the scheme of things. Your call to drop him for that seems a bit excessive.

              I was at the game. I don’t recall many times (in my 20+ years of paying to watch footy at this venue) when I’ve felt my team has been been on the end of a sequence of such poor decisions. As a paying customer of the game, I expect everyone to play by the rules - but also for the playing field to be even.

              Comment

              • Ralph Dawg
                Senior Player
                • Apr 2018
                • 1729

                #37
                Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
                I’m dead set real. I can appreciate the emotion Papley plays with. Franklin plays with emotion as well. Franklin does not descend into umpire abuse when a decision goes against him.

                I’m staggered that the majority of the Red and White community believes that it’s perfectly acceptable for Papley to abuse umpires and give away umpiring abuse free kicks. The logic being that umpires are the enemy and deserve whatever Papley dishes out.

                I can accept free kicks being given away if someone is going for the ball or doesn’t execute a tackle properly. Umpire abuse free kicks I can’t tolerate because they hurt the team for no other reason than selfish petulance.

                The coaching staff need to get this petulance out of Papley’s game. Papley behaviour towards officials is not improving.

                Papley needs stronger consequences and a two week stint as the medical sub with the associated job around the boundary at the end of the game may refocus him.

                I want Papley to stop worrying about what umpires are doing and focus on doing his job and being that amazing inspiring player that we all enjoy watching play the game.
                Paps can stay Paps. My 11yo son loves him, tries to play like him but is sensible enough to view his outbursts in the context of his passion and the importance of an AFL game (as opposed to his U11.5 match). As well, we discuss these issues and he knows how to behave with his umpires.

                On the off chance he makes it to the AFL, I would condone him blowing up at Razor Ray and his biased mob.

                Comment

                • Captain
                  Captain of the Side
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 3602

                  #38
                  My changes would be:

                  In: Stephens, Blakey, Brand
                  Out: Bell, Fox, Hayward (inj)

                  Comment

                  • Bexl
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 817

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Captain
                    My changes would be:

                    In: Stephens, Blakey, Brand
                    Out: Bell, Fox, Hayward (inj)
                    I think Warner is straight back in.


                    In Warner Gulden Brand
                    Out Bell Wicks Fox

                    Taylor sub again
                    Last edited by Bexl; 13 June 2021, 10:34 PM.

                    Comment

                    • mcs
                      Travelling Swannie!!
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 8161

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Captain
                      My changes would be:

                      In: Stephens, Blakey, Brand
                      Out: Bell, Fox, Hayward (inj)
                      Warner will come in if fit I'd expect - and maybe we might see a suprise in one of the longer term younger injury guys getting up after the bye too. Definitely think Brand will come into the team (our achilles heel is being routinely exploited down back now).

                      Originally posted by Blood Fever
                      Why are we indulging this bogus identity?
                      Amen to that.
                      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                      Comment

                      • TheBloods
                        Suspended by the MRP
                        • Feb 2020
                        • 2047

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
                        I’m dead set real. I can appreciate the emotion Papley plays with. Franklin plays with emotion as well. Franklin does not descend into umpire abuse when a decision goes against him.

                        I’m staggered that the majority of the Red and White community believes that it’s perfectly acceptable for Papley to abuse umpires and give away umpiring abuse free kicks. The logic being that umpires are the enemy and deserve whatever Papley dishes out.

                        I can accept free kicks being given away if someone is going for the ball or doesn’t execute a tackle properly. Umpire abuse free kicks I can’t tolerate because they hurt the team for no other reason than selfish petulance.

                        The coaching staff need to get this petulance out of Papley’s game. Papley behaviour towards officials is not improving.

                        Papley needs stronger consequences and a two week stint as the medical sub with the associated job around the boundary at the end of the game may refocus him.

                        I want Papley to stop worrying about what umpires are doing and focus on doing his job and being that amazing inspiring player that we all enjoy watching play the game.
                        What a load of nonsense

                        I will take undiscipline because undisciplined means frustrated and frustrated means they give a you know what

                        The rest of the team could've done with that !

                        Comment

                        • Roadrunner
                          Senior Player
                          • Jan 2018
                          • 1465

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Captain
                          My changes would be:

                          In: Stephens, Blakey, Brand
                          Out: Bell, Fox, Hayward (inj)
                          Ding Dong may not be the most talented, for sure. In a way I’m reminded of Kirky when he started- he was pretty ordinary if memory serves me correctly! So I would try him in a similar role and see how he goes. Otherwise there’s no obvious spot for him.

                          A question guys- when do you think we should play Gould to see if he can make it and also bring Ling in for a few games? Horse wants the best team each week but half the season is gone and I think we have exceeded expectations so the coaching staff have one eye on the finals. This is understandable but let’s face it, we are not good enough at this stage. Our defence is leaking goals and there isn’t sufficient rebound. This was highlighted against the Dawks who were able to bring the ball out of their backline with ease and kick to targets up forward, while we struggled to even clear the ball from our backline, let alone kick/handball to advantage. We have Pelican, Brand and Gould as talls as well as McCartin (who was down last 2 weeks) and we need to play 3 against most teams.

                          Coaches expect too much from Ramps.

                          Comment

                          • Blood Fever
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4043

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Roadrunner
                            Ding Dong may not be the most talented, for sure. In a way I’m reminded of Kirky when he started- he was pretty ordinary if memory serves me correctly! So I would try him in a similar role and see how he goes. Otherwise there’s no obvious spot for him.

                            A question guys- when do you think we should play Gould to see if he can make it and also bring Ling in for a few games? Horse wants the best team each week but half the season is gone and I think we have exceeded expectations so the coaching staff have one eye on the finals. This is understandable but let’s face it, we are not good enough at this stage. Our defence is leaking goals and there isn’t sufficient rebound. This was highlighted against the Dawks who were able to bring the ball out of their backline with ease and kick to targets up forward, while we struggled to even clear the ball from our backline, let alone kick/handball to advantage. We have Pelican, Brand and Gould as talls as well as McCartin (who was down last 2 weeks) and we need to play 3 against most teams.

                            Coaches expect too much from Ramps.
                            We will still aim for finals- it's in the club's DNA. Understand your doubts about whether we belong there but the next 3 rounds will probably tell the tale. If we falter in the second half of the year, then others will.get games. If we win 11 games, we will have exceeded expectations by some margin. We were lucky to beat Cats and Saints so we could have been 6 and 7. Very fine line. Very even competition now except for a few top teams.

                            Comment

                            • Roadrunner
                              Senior Player
                              • Jan 2018
                              • 1465

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Blood Fever
                              We will still aim for finals- it's in the club's DNA. Understand your doubts about whether we belong there but the next 3 rounds will probably tell the tale. If we falter in the second half of the year, then others will.get games. If we win 11 games, we will have exceeded expectations by some margin. We were lucky to beat Cats and Saints so we could have been 6 and 7. Very fine line. Very even competition now except for a few top teams.
                              Agreed Blood Fever. Based on that, bring in Chad and Brand for Wicks and Fox. I’m assuming Hayward will be ok.

                              Comment

                              • Nico
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 11336

                                #45
                                I would consider moving Mills back into the back line. We are clearly missing something back there. His reading of the play and stability are sorely missed. It's no coincidence that the back line fragility has happened since he has gone into the midfield.
                                http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...