Round 11 v Richmond Friday 7:50 pm SCG Pre Game Thread.
-
I agree with Liz that both Reid and Amartey were good, but Reid's goal kicking was woeful. Perhaps if the ruckman out was Ladhams and not Hickey we might have gone with Amartey, but Longmire is conservative and Reid brings the security of experience. It might have been too many unknowns and not enough stoppage practice together to carry both Ladhams and Amartey in the ruck. I would have still gone with Amartey, but I'm a bigger risk taker than the coach. I don't think this selection will be a game changer and surely Amartey will get his chance if he continues with his recent form.
The time has come where the whole team needs to put in a committed 4 quarter effort, especially at the SCG. It may be Dreamtime, but for the Swans, DoTime has arrived.Comment
-
We are still carrying too much dead weight in the team who arent good enough to pick up slack and shouldnt be getting games so often for us
Teams are stopping us from using corridor , we are turning it over in that part of the ground more than last yr and its not just because Dawson is gone .They know we are going there.
Lots to work on . Kids need more time in the gym over off season , more talent needs to be added to our list improve our depth , coaches need to be less predictable with the corridor . Busy off season needed for everyone employed at the Swans . Reason to panic , i dont think so. You look at rabble like NMFC and we are just fine .Comment
-
Hoping Tom Hickey's toe issue isn't serious and that he'll able to resume the following week against Melbourne, where he'll be so much needed. The MC might have taken this into consideration and possibly explains Tom's less than usual influence last few weeks.
They may've also thought it might not be in Armatey's best interest to play just one game to make way for Hickey the following the week. He is likely to replace Ladhams should injury/form curtail him.
Horse did comment earlier in the year when Logan McDonald was dropped, that he had to find sustained form in the reserve's so that he doesn't find himself getting dropped from the seniors every 2nd week and impact his confidence. The same thinking might being applied to Armatey so that he can enjoy a longer party when he's selected.Comment
-
1. John Longmire is not solely (or even principally) responsible for selection - there is a whole match committee for that, and it includes Pyke, Cox, Macca and Gardiner.
2. Horse is not that conservative. While he may not be as big a risk taker as you, he tries his best to win every week (hence selection of Reid over Amartey) and he has blooded a lot of youth in recent seasons. In fact I think he used to be more conservative, until about 5 years ago. 10 years ago not that many draftees were getting their debut in their first season at the Swans. In the past few years, it's been a deluge. Last year all three new draftees were squeezed into the R1 team. In the three years before that we had debuted something like the equal most players of any team. Tonight we have a second debutant in an already young team. That is not conservative selection. I don't know where our team ranks for age currently but I reckon if you left Bud out we'd be one of the younger teams, possibly youngest in the top 8? Impressively, our games played/age ratio is very good. Again, good evidence of not overly conservative selection.
I do agree that the responsibility for the results lies more with our players than our coaches and the emphasis has to be on the players giving a strong 4 quarter effort.All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)Comment
-
https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...tics?mid=10625 shows that we were considerably older and more experienced than the Blues
and then it swings the other way this weekend
"Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017Comment
-
Fox and O'Riordan sitting out the VFL game being played now.Comment
-
Dont mean this as a negative but i dont reckon we are capable of it . We have young players up and down , even our best ones.
We are still carrying too much dead weight in the team who arent good enough to pick up slack and shouldnt be getting games so often for us
Teams are stopping us from using corridor , we are turning it over in that part of the ground more than last yr and its not just because Dawson is gone .They know we are going there.
Lots to work on . Kids need more time in the gym over off season , more talent needs to be added to our list improve our depth , coaches need to be less predictable with the corridor . Busy off season needed for everyone employed at the Swans . Reason to panic , i dont think so. You look at rabble like NMFC and we are just fine .Comment
-
-
Yes, I thought that would be fun but it turned out to be quite challenging! Games is easy, but joining players to date of birth is surprisingly tricky. Especially when several share names.
There's also the question of how to define things.
"Team" could be defined several ways. I've gone with all players who have played a game in 2022 (to the end of Round 10).
Age - we can try average (mean), but that is skewed by much older players, so we can try median too.
"Games experience" - well that could be total, or mean, or median, let's try them all.The table below is sorted by total games and indeed the Swans are about "middle of the pack", 9th. If you sort by average games, 6th. By median games, 10th.
Sorted by average age the Swans are 11th and by median age, 14th (or 5th youngest so yes, not far off third).
I guess it would look a little different if we looked at the entire squad, or just the seniors, or whatever.Team mean_age median_age mean_games median_games total_games n_players Geelong 26.57 26.36 129.84 110 4155 32 Richmond 25.83 25.84 103.41 81.5 3516 34 West Coast 25.32 24.62 80.67 40 3469 43 Port Adelaide 25.04 24.75 92.41 84.5 3142 34 Brisbane Lions 25.15 24.32 94.06 88 3104 33 Western Bulldogs 25.1 25.1 83.44 75 3004 36 Melbourne 25.08 25.9 99.37 116.5 2981 30 Collingwood 24.9 24.66 87.03 58 2959 34 Sydney 24.68 23.72 92.19 59 2950 32 Greater Western Sydney 24.92 23.94 79.49 44 2782 35 Hawthorn 24.5 23.34 84.15 56 2777 33 St Kilda 25.35 25.81 84.25 73.5 2696 32 Carlton 24.05 23.98 69.64 70 2507 36 Gold Coast 24.57 24.94 74.24 66 2450 33 Essendon 23.92 24.4 66.83 54 2339 35 North Melbourne 23.91 22.82 69.48 44 2293 33 Fremantle 24.09 23.71 71 51 2201 31 Adelaide 23.73 22.82 62.5 36 2125 34 Comment
-
The Mongrel Punt awarded votes thus:
5 – Liam Baker
4 – Lance Franklin
3 – James Rowbottom
2 – Chad Warner
1 – Trent CotchinComment
Comment