Round 23: the other games. Is it that time already?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Maltopia
    Senior Player
    • Apr 2016
    • 1556

    #61
    Our required winning margin will depend on St Kilda's score.

    This is what our winning margin needs to be to get to 130.6 percentage, based on what St Kilda scores

    30 44.0
    40 47.1
    50 50.2
    60 53.2
    70 56.3
    80 59.3
    90 62.4
    100 65.5

    So we need to win by 10 goals if St Kilda score 80. If St Kilda score 50, we *only* need to win by 8.2.

    Comment

    • The Big Cat
      On the veteran's list
      • Apr 2006
      • 2360

      #62
      Originally posted by Maltopia
      Our required winning margin will depend on St Kilda's score.

      This is what our winning margin needs to be to get to 130.6 percentage, based on what St Kilda scores

      30 44.0
      40 47.1
      50 50.2
      60 53.2
      70 56.3
      80 59.3
      90 62.4
      100 65.5

      So we need to win by 10 goals if St Kilda score 80. If St Kilda score 50, we *only* need to win by 8.2.
      If we repeat our last meeting with the Saints (83 -32) we’ll do it on our ear! 131%
      Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

      Comment

      • Thunder Shaker
        Aut vincere aut mori
        • Apr 2004
        • 4226

        #63
        Originally posted by Maltopia
        Our required winning margin will depend on St Kilda's score.

        This is what our winning margin needs to be to get to 130.6 percentage, based on what St Kilda scores

        30 44.0
        40 47.1
        50 50.2
        60 53.2
        70 56.3
        80 59.3
        90 62.4
        100 65.5

        So we need to win by 10 goals if St Kilda score 80. If St Kilda score 50, we *only* need to win by 8.2.
        I figured it out a little differently, to make it easier to remember.
        We start out 35 points behind, and then we need to score 13 points for every 10 points the Saints score.

        These scores would get us ahead of Melbourne:
        0-35 (35 points)
        10-48 (38 points)
        20-61 (41 points)
        30-74 (44 points)
        40-87 (47 points)
        50-100 (50 points) These scores should be easy to remember.
        60-113 (53 points)
        70-126 (56 points)
        80-139 (59 points)
        90-152 (62 points)
        100-165 (65 points)
        "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

        Comment

        • The Big Cat
          On the veteran's list
          • Apr 2006
          • 2360

          #64
          Our number one priority is to secure the double chance, the home final is of less a concern since we are a team that plays as well away as at home (maybe better)

          I will sleep a lot better tomorrow night if GWS could somehow knock over Freo.
          Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

          Comment

          • Maltopia
            Senior Player
            • Apr 2016
            • 1556

            #65
            Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
            I figured it out a little differently, to make it easier to remember.
            We start out 35 points behind, and then we need to score 13 points for every 10 points the Saints score.

            These scores would get us ahead of Melbourne:
            0-35 (35 points)
            10-48 (38 points)
            20-61 (41 points)
            30-74 (44 points)
            40-87 (47 points)
            50-100 (50 points) These scores should be easy to remember.
            60-113 (53 points)
            70-126 (56 points)
            80-139 (59 points)
            90-152 (62 points)
            100-165 (65 points)
            Yeah, your figures are more exact than mine by a smidgeon, as I based it on needing 130.6 as an end result, when we only needed to get 130.5462 (same as Melbourne, and then we win on tiebreakers - goals kicked, and head to head record).

            My figures are the same as yours if you round off all my figures (e.g., treat the 62.4 as 62, treat 65.5 as 65 etc).

            Just to add more drama to our match!

            Comment

            • DeadlyAkkuret
              Veterans List
              • Oct 2006
              • 4547

              #66
              Our goal needs to be about 110-120. I doubt the Saints are scoring too much over 60 so that would get us within reach. If they reach 80 it’s over.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Comment

              • gloveski
                Senior Player
                • Jan 2003
                • 1018

                #67
                End of the day a win is the most important.
                Doesn’t matter if we finish 2nd or 3rd , the premiership will be won at the MCG so a finals win there won’t hurt us one bit


                Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • Kafka's Ghost
                  Regular in the Side
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 911

                  #68
                  Originally posted by gloveski
                  End of the day a win is the most important.
                  Doesn’t matter if we finish 2nd or 3rd , the premiership will be won at the MCG so a finals win there won’t hurt us one bit


                  Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                  Spot on. Win first, margin is of secondary importance.


                  Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • Kafka's Ghost
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Sep 2017
                    • 911

                    #69
                    No one will fear Brisbane after that dismal performance.


                    Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • i'm-uninformed2
                      Reefer Madness
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 4653

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Kafka's Ghost
                      No one will fear Brisbane after that dismal performance.


                      Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
                      Spot on. And they’ll be without Rayner, who’ll get at least one and possibly two weeks, and ‘if’ (and I understand it’s no more than a claim on big footy right now) what Zorko is alleged to have said is true, you can easily see Brisbane stripping him of the captaincy and/or the AFL punishing him.
                      'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                      Comment

                      • Sandridge
                        Outer wing, Lake Oval
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 2093

                        #71
                        Originally posted by The Big Cat
                        Our number one priority is to secure the double chance, the home final is of less a concern since we are a team that plays as well away as at home (maybe better)
                        I agree. Will be happy to get the win and secure the double chance. Melbourne were awesome last night but we're pretty good, too, and have already beaten them this year at the MCG. They'll be justifiably concerned about playing us.

                        Comment

                        • Industrial Fan
                          Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 3318

                          #72
                          Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                          Spot on. And they’ll be without Rayner, who’ll get at least one and possibly two weeks, and ‘if’ (and I understand it’s no more than a claim on big footy right now) what Zorko is alleged to have said is true, you can easily see Brisbane stripping him of the captaincy and/or the AFL punishing him.
                          I strongly doubt Rayner will be rubbed out. Quite different to the Kelly one where he got a week imo
                          He ate more cheese, than time allowed

                          Comment

                          • Goal Sneak
                            Out of Bounds on the Full
                            • Jun 2006
                            • 653

                            #73
                            GWS smashing Fremantle 45 - 14, although still early, very promising result for the Swans

                            Comment

                            • The Big Cat
                              On the veteran's list
                              • Apr 2006
                              • 2360

                              #74
                              Originally posted by Goal Sneak
                              GWS smashing Fremantle 45 - 14, although still early, very promising result for the Swans
                              Back to 11 points at half time. Dockers now right on top.
                              Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                              Comment

                              • stevoswan
                                Veterans List
                                • Sep 2014
                                • 8573

                                #75
                                Freo up by a point now......normal transmission resumes.

                                Comment

                                Working...