Thoughts on AFLW

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KTigers
    Senior Player
    • Apr 2012
    • 2499

    #46
    It's probably early days for the AFLW. I think the AFL sees a lot of interest from women in the code generally. Because there is a lot of
    interest. Go to a Swans game or a game in Melbourne and the ratio of women in the crowd is a lot higher than equivalent codes
    overseas and the other footy codes in Australia (I'm pretty sure no woman has ever attended a rugby union game unless her son
    was playing in it). I think that is a big part of why they think the AFLW may work in the long run. I guess we'll see. But for many
    people (myself included) at the moment the AFLW games are frustrating to watch because the skill level is just not there yet. It's
    not any more complicated than that really.
    Last edited by KTigers; 3 October 2022, 04:21 PM.

    Comment

    • aardvark
      Veterans List
      • Mar 2010
      • 5685

      #47
      Originally posted by barry
      But by aligning to the men's side, and the men's style, they think they can maximize interest and dollars.
      Smart thinking really.

      Comment

      • aardvark
        Veterans List
        • Mar 2010
        • 5685

        #48
        Pre 2010 no one gave a damn about Womens football in England. Then some clever person started up Womens Premier league. 12 years later there is a crowd of 95k at Wembley for a Womens Soccer friendly. It can all happen quickly.

        Comment

        • Mark26
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2017
          • 1535

          #49
          Originally posted by aardvark
          Pre 2010 no one gave a damn about Womens football in England. Then some clever person started up Womens Premier league. 12 years later there is a crowd of 95k at Wembley for a Womens Soccer friendly. It can all happen quickly.
          It just happens that our best footballer (up to this point) plays in it.

          Comment

          • Mark26
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2017
            • 1535

            #50
            Originally posted by U.S. Swan
            Let me ask you this...and I am not trying to be an ass. Are you ok with corporate and / or government sports subsidizing an athletic competition? For me, I have a huge problem with government sponsorship of professional sports... I believe our tax dollars are better off going to more essential resources. Likewise, I don't like corporations getting tax breaks for supporting programs where the public support just isn't there.
            I'm unsure, but allow me to ask a question in return. If it came down to it, would you prefer sport to exist or not? I know there is an opportunity cost. Being on this forum is evidence of my answer!

            Comment

            • stevoswan
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2014
              • 8548

              #51
              Originally posted by aardvark
              AFLW will be here long after you and I are gone from this earth. Who pays for it is irrelevant. In 2-3 years the expansion clubs will have caught up talent wise. AFLW is in it's 7th season so I'm guessing crowds under 1000 must be sustainable and the Advertisers keep lining up or the AFLW wouldn't exist.
              I sincerely hope it is.

              Yes it will be better when the competition is more even....and even better still when the skill level rises to a more watchable spectacle. Having said that, an even comp will be irrelevant if the footys crap.

              I'm also a big believer in the adage 'you can't be what you can't see' so it's easy to be optimistic that the game will head in the right direction.

              Comment

              • Foreign Legion
                Senior Player
                • Feb 2003
                • 3359

                #52
                The difference between AFLW and RLW and Womens soccer is those games are much easier to be 'OK' at especially Rugba League.

                The standard Aussies Rules ground is much too big for AFLW - its not just the Swans BTW. Port only scored 3 points.

                Comment

                • Meg
                  Go Swannies!
                  Site Admin
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 4828

                  #53
                  Thoughts on AFLW

                  When referring to scoring, don’t forget that the men’s matches run for a significantly longer time than those of the women.

                  The men play 20 minute quarters plus time-on for all stoppages. Women play 15 minute quarters with time-on called during stoppages only in the last two minutes of each term. That makes the women’s matches not much more than half the length of the men’s.

                  And also don’t forget that in 2020, when the length of quarters in the men’s matches was cut to 16 minutes as part of managing Covid, in one match the Swans men’s team only kicked 2.7 (19) ..... (against Freo).

                  So I suggest a little caution before using low scoring as a reason to criticise the AFLW.

                  Comment

                  • Foreign Legion
                    Senior Player
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 3359

                    #54
                    Yes Meg I understand the time differences. But the viewing public is not going to tune in long with the state of some of the games.

                    My fundamental argument is about the size of the ground. Not the ability of the women.

                    I think the ground size is working AGAINST the AFLW. Refer back to the game at North Sydney - easily the best all round game for promotion of the game.

                    Comment

                    • 0918330512
                      Senior Player
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 1654

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Meg
                      And also don’t forget that in 2020, when the length of quarters in the men’s matches was cut to 16 minutes as part of managing Covid, in one match the Swans men’s team only kicked 2.7 (19) ..... (against Freo).

                      So I suggest a little caution before using low scoring as a reason to criticise the AFLW.
                      That men’s Freo score still out scored the Swans AFLW combined scores of rounds 2,4&6 against Collingwood, Port and North (2.5 17 over 3 matches). And if you add the Swans next lowest score against GW$, the AFLW have a combined total of 4.11 35 over their 4 lowest scoring matches.

                      I don’t think the low scoring is the main criticism, rather, the factors that result in the low scoring.

                      But scores of 0.1 and 0.2? No senior Swans team in history has scored so poorly. You’d have to go back to round 8 1899 (0.5 v Carlton) to see a Swans scoreline approaching those performances. And they still out scored the combined 2 worst AFLW efforts.

                      But comparing AFLW with the mens - of any era - is apples and oranges and quite frankly, rather pointless.

                      Comment

                      • Meg
                        Go Swannies!
                        Site Admin
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 4828

                        #56
                        Originally posted by 0918330512
                        That men’s Freo score still out scored the Swans AFLW combined scores of rounds 2,4&6 against Collingwood, Port and North (2.5 17 over 3 matches). And if you add the Swans next lowest score against GW$, the AFLW have a combined total of 4.11 35 over their 4 lowest scoring matches.

                        I don’t think the low scoring is the main criticism, rather, the factors that result in the low scoring.

                        But scores of 0.1 and 0.2? No senior Swans team in history has scored so poorly. You’d have to go back to round 8 1899 (0.5 v Carlton) to see a Swans scoreline approaching those performances. And they still out scored the combined 2 worst AFLW efforts.

                        But comparing AFLW with the mens - of any era - is apples and oranges and quite frankly, rather pointless.
                        “But comparing AFLW with the mens - of any era - is apples and oranges and quite frankly, rather pointless.”

                        So why are you doing it?

                        Give the Swans women a break: they are part-timers, who had an EIGHT week preseason, and many of them met each other and the coach for the first time at the start of that preseason. They train after 5pm, many of them after work or study. Last week in Melbourne was the first time they were able to have a day training session.

                        Scott Gowans is not worrying about the scoreline in this first Swans season. He is developing an inexperienced group whom he has described as the most coachable he has worked with. I recommend listening to his interviews to gain a feel for his objectives for the team.

                        If we have total scores of just a few points in 5 years time, then we have a problem. Right now I suggest we should celebrate that the Swans have a women’s team, and give them our support.

                        Comment

                        • Industrial Fan
                          Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 3317

                          #57
                          I think the comparison started with you Meg?

                          I’m happy for the competition to thrive but I think it’s clearly been expanded way too quickly. There just aren’t enough players to produce a quality output. It’s a tricky situation as no club will want to shrink, but I think it would have been better to run a 10-12 team comp for a decade or more to build up numbers.

                          Even The A league can’t sustain that number of teams when it has established junior programs, smaller player rosters and includes New Zealand
                          He ate more cheese, than time allowed

                          Comment

                          • Mark26
                            Senior Player
                            • Jan 2017
                            • 1535

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Industrial Fan
                            I think the comparison started with you Meg?

                            I’m happy for the competition to thrive but I think it’s clearly been expanded way too quickly. There just aren’t enough players to produce a quality output. It’s a tricky situation as no club will want to shrink, but I think it would have been better to run a 10-12 team comp for a decade or more to build up numbers.

                            Even The A league can’t sustain that number of teams when it has established junior programs, smaller player rosters and includes New Zealand
                            Comparing the AFL competition with the A League is also fraught with danger as soccer (football) is the true world footy code.

                            None of our better players play in Australia. Over 200 currently line up in overseas competitions and will return to Oz to finish up their decorated careers.

                            The A League is a pathway to more robust competition abroad.

                            Everyone agrees that AFLW needs time to develop. As I said previously, increasing the starting salary will help to attract players. Having a Swans AFLW team will encourage our academy players as they can see the end point.

                            Comment

                            • 0918330512
                              Senior Player
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 1654

                              #59
                              Originally posted by Industrial Fan
                              I think the comparison started with you Meg?
                              Correct weight

                              Comment

                              • KTigers
                                Senior Player
                                • Apr 2012
                                • 2499

                                #60
                                Increasing the starting salary will bring even more athletes over from other sports who didn't grow up playing footy.

                                Comment

                                Working...