-
"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound." -
Suggest it's probably a case we are, but also a case that we need to be patient and let some of the younger guys bulk up. We had our moments today where we got on top in the middle, but few and far between.
Rowy has started season slowly too which isn't helping.
Sent from my CPH2307 using Tapatalk"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
I did see the Dee's controlling the game and then a fair dismantle leading into 3tr time thru to the last qtr
Work to do
Geelong showed their superior defence in the GF was too much to handle and the Dee's showed that today as well as much faster on the spread / breaks."be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
Was a mixture of our own inadequacies and the umpire's many frees against us. The fact they were allowed to throw and drop the ball when tackled all day but we get pinned for incorrect disposal. Absolutely wrong.
But we were not good enough. We gave them a 5 goal head start. Didn't bother turning up in the first. decided to bomb it to Bud. We again used Bud far too much and paid for it. Cunningham was in the centre corridor all alone when Heeney got the ball around the centre and he tried to hit Bud on a lead that was never going to work. A lot of stupid decisions made today. The balls coming out of the centre were just long bombs which were mostly easily picked off.
Ladhams is a two edged sword. On the one hand he can be brilliant and then he does the easy things, like a short pass, so badly and turns it over. His decision making and execution at times is woeful. Stephens was terrible today. Absolutely toweled up by Langdon. Simply couldn't keep up with him. Not only that he gave him more room the a Trump Mansion. Very disappointing. When he did get the ball his delivery was shocking. ramps looked slow on several occasions today. he was killed today. he gave away far too many goals. their smalls got hold of our small backs and destroyed them. Rampe, Lloyd, Campbell, Florent etc were beaten today.
Our forwards and mids were not working hard enough on turnover as they managed to transition easily. Someone really needs to give Harrison Petty a big old fashioned shirtfront. The guy is a thug and deserves to be treated as one. Next week I want to see Will Gould in that backline. I don't care who goes out, just get him in. He's got grunt, knows how to throw his weight around legally. Ollie tried hard, so did Blakey. Errol was good. Many players tried hard. But there were just too many factors against us. Like 50 metre penalties are free kicks for dissent. Free kicks all up and man that should have been paid to us that weren't.
While on the umpires. Since there is not Head of Footy the umpiring has been a mess. No consistency at all. The throw is now officially legal as they only penalise non Vic clubs. Who the effing knows what is dissent and what isn't. There are 36 different interpretations being used. Why does the AFL not admit the umpiring is a problem. They obviously thought it was otherwise we would not have 4 umpies instead 3. It hasn't made a lot of different really the umpiring is still the same amateurish @@@@e it has been for years. In fact, it's worse because they are not even consistent in the same game. Will a new Head of Football help? Probably not, because you will get the same lickspittles applying for the job. Nobody that actually knows anything about football wants to work for the AFL. Because it is a private schoolboy's club.
I am almost at the stage where I simply just don't care anymore. I am thinking of never looking at this sport again because of the @@@@e administration of the game and the tainting of the product by design. If you think the amount of throws and dropped ball let go is not by design and the way those in at AFL Headquarters want the game then you are deluded. They all went to Private Schools so they would have played quite a lot of Union. This looks much like Union on a far bigger field now.Comment
-
There are always going to be games when the other side kicks straight for goal and we don't. It's the nature of the game.
I think we play better without Franklin and we won't improve until he's out of the side. I thought Amartey was excellent, except for his goal kicking, which is usually pretty good. We should consider bringing Sheldrick into the side to help with our contested possessions.
It's was a big score against us, but there's still plenty to like about the way we play and despite to big margin, we are still heading in the right direction.Comment
-
I didn’t think we were too bad till three quarter time, and the fact if Blakey had kicked that goal on the run in the third we would have been back to a point, shows that.
But, the last quarter was disappointing. And our midfield was generally poor. A couple like Stephens and Warner, so good the first two weeks, were right off today, and we continue to have a contested ball problem. I think one of the commentators picked this up too - and that is, we were very dependent on our kicking skills, and bar a couple of bursts of play, lacked overlap.
A couple of other observations: I’d disagree with others that said we were too Buddy focused. I thought both Amartey and Logan had good moments, and I thought our mid sized forwards in Hayward and Heeney were well down on their usual marking prowess if we are looking for issues forward of the ball to fix.
And by the way, when we’ve got a chain of handballs finally going, do NOT use the ruckman as the one who’ll then be the release kick. No knock on Ladhams, but we need to find better choices.
And agree with above. The ump’s focus on minor infringements versus obvious incorrect disposals or HTB sends supporters mad. It wasn’t about bias today, but incompetence.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
I do think no matter how u break it down
A 50 point loss is a 50 point loss"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
Yes, it's a dreadful loss and you can blame several factors. One being the coaching and selection staff. They picked a really fast side and we did not match it. If we give up these sorts of scores to one team other teams are going to learn from this and it becomes a habit. By the way I think it is time for the Gould train.Comment
-
"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Well Said @wolftones-
I don't know- I think the AFL like to run a narrative because the game is all about money/betting nowadays. I think the narrative favours Melbourne clubs and let's face it, it's still the VFL after all these years. The Swans have to be competitive because the Giants have been a bit of a glorious failure, and they need Sydney to be able to maintain the 'A' in AFL and to drive up the TV rights price. I enjoy the game, but every year I have to stop myself getting too invested because I don't think the Swans get a fair go. So I'll do what I do every year, go to the SCG , see a few games, have some good nights and then watch the other games on TV casually. I've been a member over 20 years now and I consider myself a Swans fan not an AFL fan.Comment
-
That was a right old shellacking. I watched a bit of the Hawks game during the week and thought that really wasn't the perfect preparation for a high pressure game, and thus it proved to be.
They were way too strong and way too structured for us, Petracca and Oliver are all class. Even so, -30 contested possessions is a dismal showing.
Loved the Bud's game bar his set shot kicking and loved our fight back bar the goal kicking but not much to enthuse about otherwise.
I agree that Harrison Petty's approach to driving the marker into the ground seems from a bygone era - I thought that sort of crap was meant to be ironed out? Seeing the nonsense things we were penalised 50m for and he didn't get anything for his several gutless efforts was terrifically frustrating. And speaking of nostalgia, I haven't seen that many throw go unpenalised since the 2016 GF - staggering.
But we've got some work to do no doubt - will need to regroup and reset for Port.Comment
-
I thought we were the better side from the beginning of the second quarter to mid way through the third. We got within single figures but they broke our hearts with outstanding kicking for goal whereas we couldn't capitalise on our chances. However, they just ran over us in the last 40 minutes. We were trying to take a lot of risks to make up the margin but some bad turnovers really hurt and they were good enough to take advantage. Having only one midfielder get 20+ possessions is not good enough. The Chad has been down on form, Gulden had his least impactful game, and RB has lost most of his offence.
However, I don't think it's a disaster game. The scoreline still flatters them. They are a very good side too. I was really impressed with some of their younger players. They play their roles well and will be right at the pointy end again this year.Comment
-
From what I've heard the reserves were bog average all round today which is a bit of a concern as there doesn't seem to be a lot of selection pressure coming from there!
Happy to hear otherwise from anyone who saw the game today.
Sent from my SM-F936B using TapatalkComment
-
"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Completely agree. He’s been a shadow of himself since he was cleaned up in the final against Melbourne last year.
We went into the game without much preparation for a hard, contested match, something which worried me through the week, and so it happened. We still created plenty of chances, but didn’t capitalise, and we were thoroughly flogged in the contested possessions subsequently.
Plenty to work on, and hopefully a wake up call after two relatively easy matches to open.
Gesendet von iPad mit TapatalkComment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 01:01 PM.
Comment