-
-
Can’t say I’m a strategist but to me it looked like they just got better - less turnover, better at the loose ball, cleaner hands, better decision making and probably a few more. Not sure how any of that is our coachs’ fault.Patterns emerge, but do they mean anything? No.Comment
-
Tigers were cleaner with the ball after half time .Comment
-
Really disappointed with the boys tonight, don’t think this team is as good as we and they think they areComment
-
What an utter garbage second half. Not much leadership on show out there at times - brain dead football, alongside brain dead umpiring at times.
Maybe the AFL should consider cards for serious misconduct though. Nankervis will be getting a holiday for that blatant bump yet we had to suffer through almost 3/4s of the game down a key man.
What a microcosm of our frustrating season in a nutshell however."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
We are officially done for the year
Give Buddy his farewell and move on..... He is as predictable as a 1st gamer with ball in hand.
The crucifixion of Fox is hard to watch, destroyed the guy.
Our talk is down, how many guys ran into trouble, they never did, tapped instead of getting possession etc.
Gulden, rowy, parks they all run into troubleComment
-
I thought their second half was one of the worst half of football they have played all year, barring the Geelong game. Losing contests time after time, thrashed at centre bounces. Hickey is at the end. I would give McAndrew a go in the ruck. They really need some good draft picks.Comment
-
You’re playing the same song time and again, mate. The boys just weren’t up to it tonight. Just have a look at the shots Richmond missed and the entries in their forward 50. We were simply outplayed in the second half and too many mistakes- look at Ramp’s last kick looking for Buddy and went straight to a Tiger- we were 1 point behind at that stage.
You can’t blame Horse for players’ mistakes.
Sorry guys- we didn’t deserve to win this game.Comment
-
Its never the coaches fault. Have a small fast midfielder as your sub would have made no difference at all given that had 1 tall forward and the forecast was for rain. Are you kidding. The fact McCartin had to play forward in the last quarter confirms what a disastrous decision it was.
What did John do to change then game, oh mills to the backline when we are getting smashed in the middle. How many times is that going to fail before we actually have a new plan, you know one that doesnt involve the same tired and failed tactics.
But no had nothing to do with John as usual.
- - - Updated - - -
Man for man are you saying Richmond has the better team? No they dont thats the problem! This is an extremely poor Richmond side.
And yes i am that says everything doesnt it. Am waiting for a John tactical masterclass to prove me wrong.Comment
-
All round terrible effort and yes, Coaches have a lot to do with it
Poor selection when our best defender by a mile Tom Mc is put fwd to fit in.
Someone tell the magnet man its not under 10s, not everyone has to play everywhereComment
-
Biggest mistake was playing Francis as the sub.
Biggest worry is McCartin’s form. He was going to be our All Australian defender. He is seemingly rated lower than Melican and Francis now based on the fact he got shifted forward.
Next big worry is Hickey. Put a fork in him, he’s done. I would really love to have a long term, stable ruck. I hope like hell that Ladhams can get it together.Comment
-
Richmond beat us at the scramble, contested and ground ball in the second half. A few of our better ball users in Rampe, Blakey and Gulden missed a few critical kicks in the second half. And the Hickey fade out hurt.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
I watched the first half, couldn't watch the second half....the PLAYERS were making too many mistakes early in the third, so turned over to the cricket. Come back here to read the usual suspects, ie: those who think they are AFL standard coaches
singing the same old coach bashing song. It really is tiresome. Nighty night, back to the cricket....which by the way, isn't going too well either. Maybe they should sack McDonald yes? Any self appointed cricket coaches out there? 
Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 06:16 AM.
Comment