Rnd 24 vs Melbourne at the SCG, Sunday 27 August at 3:20 PM

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16786

    #31
    If we weren't already the scourge of the AFL media before this, the knives will be sharpening as I write.

    Comment

    • MattW
      Veterans List
      • May 2011
      • 4231

      #32
      So good. Tom would be in our five most valuable players, at minimum, so this as an important decision.

      I do feel for McAdam, but it was an accident caused by the last second wicked ball bounce and the comparative stature of the players.

      Comment

      • i'm-uninformed2
        Reefer Madness
        • Oct 2003
        • 4653

        #33
        Bwahahahaha.

        Gil will impose another trade ban on his way out the door the way we’re going.

        - - - Updated - - -

        Originally posted by MattW
        So good. Tom would be in our five most valuable players, at minimum, so this as an important decision.

        I do feel for McAdam, but it was an accident caused by the last second wicked ball bounce and the comparative stature of the players.
        I’ve felt for three years now that given the clear lack of an alternative, he’s our most valuable player.
        'Delicious' is a fun word to say

        Comment

        • stellation
          scott names the planets
          • Sep 2003
          • 9723

          #34
          Magnifique!

          Now if we can just get our legal eagles on to helping the goal umpire that was stood down back on the active list and shipped to the SCG that’d be great!
          I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
          We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

          Comment

          • waswan
            Senior Player
            • Oct 2015
            • 2047

            #35
            great news common sense prevails

            Now we just have to listen to Kingy talk about it not sending a message

            Poor bloke had no option, how you can look at it anyother way is mind boggling

            Comment

            • Blood Fever
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2007
              • 4051

              #36
              Originally posted by liz
              If we weren't already the scourge of the AFL media before this, the knives will be sharpening as I write.
              No doubt but won't worry us and just might motivate us.

              Comment

              • MattW
                Veterans List
                • May 2011
                • 4231

                #37
                Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                Bwahahahaha.

                Gil will impose another trade ban on his way out the door the way we’re going.

                - - - Updated - - -



                I’ve felt for three years now that given the clear lack of an alternative, he’s our most valuable player.
                Probably. In the current squad (e.g. no Buddy), it's hard to see us winning many big games without Heeney, Papley or Gulden. Next tier, in order: Blakey, Parker, Rowbottom, Mills.

                Comment

                • Maltopia
                  Senior Player
                  • Apr 2016
                  • 1556

                  #38
                  McCartin free to play!

                  The verdict is in: Tom McCartin and Taylor Duryea learn fate at Tribunal

                  Comment

                  • chalbilto
                    Senior Player
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 1139

                    #39
                    Wow the Victorian and South Australian media and supporters are going to go nuts. I was wrong with my initial judgement of the incident but I an totally rapt. The footy gods are shining down upon us.

                    Comment

                    • Blood Fever
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 4051

                      #40
                      Story from Channel 9 saying that Swans are succession planning so that Dean Cox takes over from JL when he eventually gives it away. Strong WA influence at the club with Cox, Pyke Mcdonald, Warner Brothers, Sheldrick and Buller. Reminiscent of South before 1933 flag when there was what was known as the Foreign Legion with a number of players also having come over from WA.

                      Their influence then was instrumental in the Swans nickname. RucknRoll might want to weigh in on this!

                      Comment

                      • MattW
                        Veterans List
                        • May 2011
                        • 4231

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Blood Fever
                        Story from Channel 9 saying that Swans are succession planning so that Dean Cox takes over from JL when he eventually gives it away. Strong WA influence at the club with Cox, Pyke Mcdonald, Warner Brothers, Sheldrick and Buller. Reminiscent of South before 1933 flag when there was what was known as the Foreign Legion with a number of players also having come over from WA.

                        Their influence then was instrumental in the Swans nickname. RucknRoll might want to weigh in on this!
                        That would surprise me. Had in mind a McVeigh dynasty.

                        Also: a fair bit still left in John. Still very clearly has the players' respect and buy-in.

                        Comment

                        • Blood Fever
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 4051

                          #42
                          Article inferred he would take over in 2026

                          Comment

                          • i'm-uninformed2
                            Reefer Madness
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 4653

                            #43
                            Originally posted by MattW
                            That would surprise me. Had in mind a McVeigh dynasty.

                            Also: a fair bit still left in John. Still very clearly has the players' respect and buy-in.
                            It would surprise me too that anyone would have a goddamn clue, and I bet Longmire hasn’t even made that decision. Media spec.

                            Re Mcveigh, I do think when you look at the CV of the best coaches, they’ve been in more than one football program. I wonder if a few years outside the Swans would benefit him to broaden his thinking.
                            'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                            Comment

                            • neilfws
                              Senior Player
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 1834

                              #44
                              Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                              Re Mcveigh, I do think when you look at the CV of the best coaches, they’ve been in more than one football program. I wonder if a few years outside the Swans would benefit him to broaden his thinking.
                              I can't think of many "favourite son groomed to be the coach" success stories. Voss at Brisbane (too soon), Hird (oh dear), Buckley (almost won them a GF at least).

                              I'm sure the Swans would do it better of course!

                              Maybe I can only recall the negative examples - there must have been some successes?

                              Comment

                              • liz
                                Veteran
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16786

                                #45
                                Originally posted by neilfws
                                I can't think of many "favourite son groomed to be the coach" success stories. Voss at Brisbane (too soon), Hird (oh dear), Buckley (almost won them a GF at least).

                                I'm sure the Swans would do it better of course!

                                Maybe I can only recall the negative examples - there must have been some successes?
                                Roos wasn't exactly a "favourite son" of the Swans, given he arrived so late in his playing career. And of course he had experience at another club in a playing capacity, though I suspect most of the lessons from his time at Fitzroy fell into the "how not to run a club" bucket.

                                But he didn't gain any coaching experience outside the Swans before taking over and, indeed, had a relatively short apprenticeship as a coach at the Swans before taking over the top job. He retired from playing at the end of 1998, spent a couple of seasons living in the US (and studying sports management informally) and doing some media work here in Australia. He then became an assistant coach at the Swans in 2001 and by the middle of 2002 had the caretaker job.

                                As a general rule, I agree with IU2's observation that time in another environment is highly beneficial. Ideally a coach would do this even if they had played at another club, but I reckon it's even more important if you've only ever been at one club as a player and assistant coach.

                                Comment

                                Working...