If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I need my eyesight checked. Both of those review goals were called touched. I could not see either touched. Or Maybe the Goal review guy needs his eyesight checked.?
I agree but overall thought the umpiring was okay.
I think it was a pretty even contest but they just kicked straighter
I need my eyesight checked. Both of those review goals were called touched. I could not see either touched. Or Maybe the Goal review guy needs his eyesight checked.?
I have to admit we lost against a team that ain’t that good but did bring pressure better than I have seen the do for some time.
And we tagged all their midfield which I am trying to come to terms with ie is our midfield so inferior we need to have so many of our mids running with and or tagging?
It almost felt that if Gulden didn’t play we would have lost by 6 goals?
Last comment: yes. Gulden is a phenomenon. And will just get better.
I need my eyesight checked. Both of those review goals were called touched. I could not see either touched. Or Maybe the Goal review guy needs his eyesight checked.?
Actually, I agree that the first one was definitely touched, the ball deviated....but the second one....no way they could call that touched from the blurry 1960's era vision. Pathetic that they called it touched.....but they had the goal umpires soft call on their side and thought they would have just said 'Umpires call'. Sort of proves their bias.
Comment