2024 List Management
Collapse
X
-
Take 3: How do people feel about losing Hayward after today? What if we could get Zurhaar as a replacement?Comment
-
And I've never been all that excited by the occasional, but persistent rumours, that Zurhaar for some reason is coming to the Swans. If he's better than the average medium forward, I doubt it'd be by much?Comment
-
I tend to doubt that Hayward will go. He's always seemed happy at the club, and as far as I know, him and Florent have still got their alcoholic soft drink business. I think it's called Doozy? Plus him and Longmire also seem to have a pretty strong bond.
And I've never been all that excited by the occasional, but persistent rumours, that Zurhaar for some reason is coming to the Swans. If he's better than the average medium forward, I doubt it'd be by much?'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Still would have been better....as hindsight has proven.....not that KB had that then....but just the fact that Serong was bloody good, which KB did know (in fact, the whole footy world knew) and that he was also a mad keen Swans supporter makes KB's 'gamble' in the least, puzzling.Comment
-
Still would have been better....as hindsight has proven.....not that KB had that then....but just the fact that Serong was bloody good, which KB did know (in fact, the whole footy world knew) and that he was also a mad keen Swans supporter makes KB's 'gamble' in the least, puzzling.
From my memory of St Twomey’s gospel, Stephens was rated more highly than Serong. He just turned out to be a dud. And Serong has massively exceeded expectations.Comment
-
Re Serong, he probably went to the Dockers determined to prove the Swans wrong for not drafting a rabid fan.....boy has he done that!Comment
-
I revisited Twomeys draft rankings and I’m totally wrong. He had Serong at 4 and Stephens at 12. So Serong would appear “best available” rather than Stephens.
As an aside I struggle to understand some drafting decisions - for example another club bidding on Campbell at 5 and Gulden in the 30s, when I’d say Guldens exposed form was probably better.Comment
-
I think I’ll have to mute the word Serong given what this thread will become over the next week or so given we play Freo'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Ludwig has macular degeneraion, so that makes it difficult for him to type. Otherwise he is ok and still watches all the games. His short vision is crap.Comment
-
I revisited Twomeys draft rankings and I’m totally wrong. He had Serong at 4 and Stephens at 12. So Serong would appear “best available” rather than Stephens.
As an aside I struggle to understand some drafting decisions - for example another club bidding on Campbell at 5 and Gulden in the 30s, when I’d say Guldens exposed form was probably better."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
Comment