Round 2 v Essendon

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mel_C
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4470

    #16
    Lloyd and Rampe will both be playing their 200th game. I feel like we haven't been successful in milestone games recently. Or am I imagining it?

    Comment

    • Mel_C
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 4470

      #17
      Originally posted by 707
      Yep, this is Essendon, so many close games or losses when we should have blown them away, definite DANGER GAME
      Exactly! Plus something strange always seems to happen when we play Essendon.

      Comment

      • Dow
        Regular in the Side
        • Sep 2022
        • 826

        #18
        Originally posted by O'Reilly Boy
        I think Amartey was good against Pies—provided a tall target high up the wings, much in the manner that Reid plays. The Melbourne game had a different shape, so that aspect of play was not so significant. the broader MCG brings a big man with the capacity to work to the wings into the game a bit more, I guess, and if the conditions on Saturday are similar to that night (warm, slippery ball), perhaps playing a small instead of either Amartey or Ladhams would be an option.
        I would be inclined to keep the same 23, although as a Wicks fan, I wonder whether he might be worth a starting guernsey, with Lloyd as reserve, or even Warner junior to provide a bit of late game run?
        Some good thoughts, although a hell of a lot would need to go wrong for Warner Jnr to get a game he really needs a massive year in the 2s to show that he has it or I reckon he will be delisted in the next year or so.

        Comment

        • Maltopia
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2016
          • 1556

          #19
          Reid if fit, would be good in this game, as someone to relief ruck and defend on two meter Peter.

          Remember how Rory Lobb took all those marks against us last year? Peter Wright might be too tall for McCartin or Melican and cause similar carnage. One of them will have to defend Langford anyway, who kicked a few on us last year.

          Then if Draper and/or Redman are lurking/resting up forward, that is a lot of marking power, plus Stringer who is a strong lad.

          They have some other good players in form in Parrish, McGrath and Merritt.

          We are in great form so far, but it really looks like a danger game!

          Comment

          • liz
            Veteran
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 16758

            #20
            Originally posted by Maltopia
            Reid if fit, would be good in this game, as someone to relief ruck and defend on two meter Peter.

            Remember how Rory Lobb took all those marks against us last year? Peter Wright might be too tall for McCartin or Melican and cause similar carnage. One of them will have to defend Langford anyway, who kicked a few on us last year.

            Then if Draper and/or Redman are lurking/resting up forward, that is a lot of marking power, plus Stringer who is a strong lad.

            They have some other good players in form in Parrish, McGrath and Merritt.

            We are in great form so far, but it really looks like a danger game!
            Redman is suspended so he's a non-factor this week.

            Not sure Parish is "in-form" given he didn't play last weekend. He's down as a test for this week, so he could come into their side. He's one of those players who consistently racks up large numbers of possessions, though not always with much impact.

            Not sure what is going on with Draper. He didn't play last week but he's not listed on their injury list. I think he had some fairly major injury issue over the off-season and they're easing him back in.

            Comment

            • graemed
              Swans2win
              • Jan 2003
              • 410

              #21
              If as predicted by the BOM there is showers in the afternoon and evening then 3 Talls on the forward line seems overkill to me, irrespective of form.
              This is a case of “horses for courses”, so with that in mind, I’m making a left field suggestion that we select Wicks and use a debutante as the sub, specifically, Konstanty. I watched him closely through the preseason, after a conversation KB last year when he recommended him highly, he was impressive. Still needs time but looks like he’d be perfect as a crumber, with speed, initiative, anticipation and kicking skills.
              Armarty seems to be the popular choice as the unlucky one and although I worry about the kicking skills of both Harry and Fox, it’s true the least contributing player to date is Lloyd. Would it be possible to have the debutante in the 22 and have either Harry or LLoyd as sub.
              I’m loving these types of dilemmas after so cruel a year as the last one, where we had no tall choices.

              Comment

              • i'm-uninformed2
                Reefer Madness
                • Oct 2003
                • 4653

                #22
                Originally posted by Mel_C
                Lloyd and Rampe will both be playing their 200th game. I feel like we haven't been successful in milestone games recently. Or am I imagining it?
                Not quite. It’s their 200th game of playing together. What rookie list gems they’ve been.
                'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                Comment

                • Hotpotato
                  Senior Player
                  • Jun 2014
                  • 2268

                  #23
                  Ive been wondering if LUDWIG is OK .
                  Not that I know him, just seems MIA .

                  Comment

                  • dejavoodoo44
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 8578

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Hotpotato
                    Ive been wondering if LUDWIG is OK .
                    Not that I know him, just seems MIA .
                    I made the same inquiry on another thread a week or two ago. It seems like he had an accident with his reading glasses while staying in Vietnam and won't be posting until he's back in Thailand. Which should be pretty soon.

                    Comment

                    • giant
                      Veterans List
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 4731

                      #25
                      Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                      Not quite. It’s their 200th game of playing together. What rookie list gems they’ve been.
                      Great call - might that be a record?

                      Comment

                      • neilfws
                        Senior Player
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 1822

                        #26
                        Originally posted by giant
                        Great call - might that be a record?
                        Do you mean a record for rookie list players, or any pair? Quite a few pairs have played 200 or more together - Adam Goodes and Jude Bolton top the list with 301.

                        Comment

                        • dejavoodoo44
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2015
                          • 8578

                          #27
                          Originally posted by neilfws
                          Do you mean a record for rookie list players, or any pair? Quite a few pairs have played 200 or more together - Adam Goodes and Jude Bolton top the list with 301.
                          I just tried looking into possibilities for the rookie list games together record. For the Swans, Heath Grundy was rookie listed in 2005 and Kieren Jack was rookie listed in 2006. They both played 256 games and both retired in 2019. So I suspect they have the record for us. I've no idea for other clubs.

                          Comment

                          • liz
                            Veteran
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 16758

                            #28
                            Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                            I just tried looking into possibilities for the rookie list games together record. For the Swans, Heath Grundy was rookie listed in 2005 and Kieren Jack was rookie listed in 2006. They both played 256 games and both retired in 2019. So I suspect they have the record for us. I've no idea for other clubs.
                            If the record isn't held by a pair of Swans, Freo or the Bulldogs are likely candidates. Like us, they've found a number of long-lasting gems from the rookie list, often in multiples, and especially in the 2000s.

                            Comment

                            • giant
                              Veterans List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 4731

                              #29
                              Originally posted by neilfws
                              Do you mean a record for rookie list players, or any pair? Quite a few pairs have played 200 or more together - Adam Goodes and Jude Bolton top the list with 301.
                              I meant rookie listed pairs - DJ44's call-out of the Grundy/Jack pairing seems a good call, and of course Nick Smith was a contemporary as well.

                              Comment

                              • dejavoodoo44
                                Veterans List
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 8578

                                #30
                                Originally posted by liz
                                If the record isn't held by a pair of Swans, Freo or the Bulldogs are likely candidates. Like us, they've found a number of long-lasting gems from the rookie list, often in multiples, and especially in the 2000s.
                                Just skimming through who's played the most games off the rookie list, the most likely challengers are Matthew Boyd and Dale Morris from the Bulldogs. Boyd played 292 games and Morris 253, but there's more of a mismatch, in that Boyd debuted in 2003 and retired in 2017, while Morris went from 2005 to 2019.

                                Comment

                                Working...