Let’s hope we haven’t peaked and we keep it rolling, as we have seen in the passed it’s hard to stay up for an entire season
Round 10: Swans v Blues @ SCG
Collapse
X
-
[QUOTE=stevoswan;884772]Yep, I've seen the footage of the Parker incident....it does not look good. Add to that, the Frankston player was left with "serious facial injuries" according to afl.com.au. Luke will miss weeks.
[COLOR="silver"]- - - Updated - - -[/
It was hard to watch and understand, he literally ran past the ball and ironed him out
- - - Updated - - -
The best sub in the competition I reckon, he is literally designed for this roleComment
-
We are playing great football but let’s not forget how good that midfield was 2012-16.
Kennedy was the best contested ball and clearance player in the comp, Hanners had a three year stretch where he vied for no1 player in comp and won a coaches award, Parker became a goal kicking gun mid, Jack was as good a two way runner as we’ve seen, ROK was elite at the start of that era, we had Goodes often rolling in off a wing and McVeigh’s footy IQ and field kicking was so good Pendlebury said a couple of years ago he was the best he’d seen.
We’re playing more attacking footy, maybe have slightly more depth and a couple of our blokes have real points of difference, but that crew were hardly a bunch of bums.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
We are playing great football but let’s not forget how good that midfield was 2012-16.
Kennedy was the best contested ball and clearance player in the comp, Hanners had a three year stretch where he vied for no1 player in comp and won a coaches award, Parker became a goal kicking gun mid, Jack was as good a two way runner as we’ve seen, ROK was elite at the start of that era, we had Goodes often rolling in off a wing and McVeigh’s footy IQ and field kicking was so good Pendlebury said a couple of years ago he was the best he’d seen.
We’re playing more attacking footy, maybe have slightly more depth and a couple of our blokes have real points of difference, but that crew were hardly a bunch of bums.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Gesendet von iPhone mit TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
Chad has got a fine for his indiscretion. Which I think is a touch harsh, as I thought he made initial contact with Pittonet's chest and then made glancing contact under the chin. Although, since I often find tribunal decisions unpredictable, I'm a touch relieved that he wasn't suspended.
Anyway, from the AFL site: "The match review officer graded the offence as careless conduct, low impact and high contact, resulting in a fine of $6250, or $3750 with an early plea."
AFLPA need to have a look at themselves, agreeing to that crap.Comment
-
Interestingly, the Swans barely rate a mention on the AFL “Eight Things We Learned” again. It’s all about the Blues midfield.
Sent from my iPad using TapatalkComment
-
Apparently, there’s nothing to learn about the team on top of the ladder giving a bath to everyone they come up against. Flying under the radar is one thing, but this is such myopic crap.
Eight things we learned: Patrick Cripps and Sam Walsh need more support from Carlton's midfield'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
I doubt it but so far it's been an 'annus horribilis' for him.Comment
-
Apparently, there’s nothing to learn about the team on top of the ladder giving a bath to everyone they come up against. Flying under the radar is one thing, but this is such myopic crap.
Eight things we learned: Patrick Cripps and Sam Walsh need more support from Carlton's midfield
Gesendet von iPhone mit TapatalkComment
-
Apparently, there’s nothing to learn about the team on top of the ladder giving a bath to everyone they come up against. Flying under the radar is one thing, but this is such myopic crap.
Eight things we learned: Patrick Cripps and Sam Walsh need more support from Carlton's midfieldComment
-
It might be an interesting exercise to go through all of those "things we learned" and keep a count of teams mentioned in each, with 1/2 a point if both teams are mentioned more or less evenly. Which teams get mentioned the most?"Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
Watching the replay, midfield and the Swans in general got a pretty good and extensive rave on Fox post game coverage. What a rare thrill. Even questioned during the game if there might be a problem with peaking too early. Is it true? I do feel a little nervous that the footy gods may have a sting in the tail somewhere!Comment
Comment