AFLW Round 8: Sydney Swans v Essendon 3.10pm AEDT Sat 15 Oct 2022 Ikon Park

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Meg
    Go Swannies!
    Site Admin
    • Aug 2011
    • 4828

    #16
    Three Swans’ players in the coaches’ votes.

    VOTES PLAYER (CLUB)

    10 Sophie Alexander (ESS)
    6 Sofia Hurley (SYD)
    6 Madison Prespakis (ESS)
    3 Stephanie Cain (ESS)
    3 Bonnie Toogood (ESS)
    1 Paige Sheppard (SYD)
    1 Lexi Hamilton (SYD)

    Comment

    • bloodspirit
      Clubman
      • Apr 2015
      • 4448

      #17
      We have also used other factors to draw players here e.g. offering or finding them employment.

      Brooke Lochland cited her desire to be near the beach as one reason she came to Sydney.

      Totally agree Ham and Hurley are excellent selections who we are lucky to have recruited. I would say that Cynthia Hamilton, our home-grown talent (from Queanbeyan), is just as good.
      All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

      Comment

      • aardvark
        Veterans List
        • Mar 2010
        • 5685

        #18
        Apparently the AFL have admitted Molly Eastman's shot for goal in the third quarter was a goal not a point. Swans probably should have won the game.

        Comment

        • Meg
          Go Swannies!
          Site Admin
          • Aug 2011
          • 4828

          #19
          Originally posted by aardvark
          Apparently the AFL have admitted Molly Eastman's shot for goal in the third quarter was a goal not a point. Swans probably should have won the game.
          [emoji2368]

          Comment

          • bloodspirit
            Clubman
            • Apr 2015
            • 4448

            #20
            Originally posted by aardvark
            Apparently the AFL have admitted Molly Eastman's shot for goal in the third quarter was a goal not a point. Swans probably should have won the game.
            !!!!

            That sucks! Should have been our first ever win. Would have been Molly's first ever goal. All the players thought it was a goal at the time.
            All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

            Comment

            • mcs
              Travelling Swannie!!
              • Jul 2007
              • 8161

              #21


              Thought it looked clearly a goal watching telecast, but this reverse angle shows it truly was a howler of a call.

              Sent from my CPH2009 using Tapatalk
              "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

              Comment

              • Mel_C
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4470

                #22
                Originally posted by aardvark
                Apparently the AFL have admitted Molly Eastman's shot for goal in the third quarter was a goal not a point. Swans probably should have won the game.
                I just saw behind the goal footage of the kick on the news and it clearly went through the goals without hitting the post. It was the same angle the goal umpire would have been standing, so I don't know how she couldn't see it was a goal. The players were certain it was a goal. I was listening to the game on the radio and they called it a goal and were surprised when it was awarded a point.

                Thanks for the apology AFL ????. It most probably cost us our first win.

                Comment

                • ootf
                  Pushing for Selection
                  • Apr 2018
                  • 69

                  #23
                  The goal umpire involved saw the post wobble (poorly positioned looking along the line, wasn't the first time) and called a behind - unfortunately it was from a defender bumping into it. :-( If you watch the footage, the field umpire initially signals 'goal' then changes on the goal umpire call.
                  Disappointing for the team given their performance, perhaps last chance for a win this season on Saturday against the Dockers.

                  As others have mentioned, Triple H (Ham Hurley and Hamilton) looking good - and Paige Sheppard at 160cms doesn't shirk the midfield contests (15 possessions/4 tackles v Bombers).

                  It will be interesting to see what happens post season. Will the Swans retain a large part of the current squad to build on this year or will there be a major refresh?

                  Comment

                  • mcs
                    Travelling Swannie!!
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8161

                    #24
                    Originally posted by ootf
                    The goal umpire involved saw the post wobble (poorly positioned looking along the line, wasn't the first time) and called a behind - unfortunately it was from a defender bumping into it. :-( If you watch the footage, the field umpire initially signals 'goal' then changes on the goal umpire call.
                    Disappointing for the team given their performance, perhaps last chance for a win this season on Saturday against the Dockers.

                    As others have mentioned, Triple H (Ham Hurley and Hamilton) looking good - and Paige Sheppard at 160cms doesn't shirk the midfield contests (15 possessions/4 tackles v Bombers).

                    It will be interesting to see what happens post season. Will the Swans retain a large part of the current squad to build on this year or will there be a major refresh?
                    Will be interesting to see what we do. I suspect it will be a case of doing all we can to maintain the main key core (The Triple H + a few others), then refresh some parts from there - but without drastic surgery if we can avoid it.

                    We seemed to take a strategy of trying to give a lot of players on the fringe 'a chance' in the first season. I suspect the intent there is to find a few diamonds in the rough, recognising not all will pay off or be good enough long term - but noting we can go to the draft to continue to build the core going forward, and we can gradually shape the list around that, while still giving some of those other players a couple of seasons to show whether they can make it or not at the top level.
                    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                    Comment

                    • bloodspirit
                      Clubman
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 4448

                      #25
                      Originally posted by aardvark
                      Apparently the AFL have admitted Molly Eastman's shot for goal in the third quarter was a goal not a point. Swans probably should have won the game.
                      Goal-umpiring error cost Swans in loss to Dons: AFL (womens.afl)
                      All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                      Comment

                      • Meg
                        Go Swannies!
                        Site Admin
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 4828

                        #26
                        Interesting analysis of the improvements shown by the Swans in Saturday’s game.

                        “IT HAS been a tough induction to the AFLW for Sydney. ……………. but energy is up in the Swans camp …………… they seem to have turned a corner.’

                        Latest breaking AFLW news from the official website of the Australian Football League.

                        Comment

                        • 707
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 6204

                          #27
                          What a dreadfully amateurish incorrect score call. May well have robbed us of our first victory which was deserved, grrrr

                          Comment

                          • aardvark
                            Veterans List
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 5685

                            #28
                            Originally posted by mcs
                            Will be interesting to see what we do. I suspect it will be a case of doing all we can to maintain the main key core (The Triple H + a few others), then refresh some parts from there - but without drastic surgery if we can avoid it.
                            I'm willing to bet we are already talking to the next top Victorian draft picks to see who's interested in Sydney Uni and a unit at the beach, similar to what we did with Hurley and Hams. I also reckon we're in line for a priority pick or two. Our pick one will be of interest to all Vic clubs so a trade might be happening for an A Grader as well. If we manage the next 6 months well I can see us being very competitive next year. Only guessing but we'd be due a few decent players out of the Academy sometime soon I'd reckon.

                            Comment

                            • The Big Cat
                              On the veteran's list
                              • Apr 2006
                              • 2354

                              #29
                              Absolute and utter rubbish speculation. It was in the third quarter for goodness sake! The ball would have gone back to the centre and not kicked out. Swans could have lost by ten goals after that. Who knows.

                              I get frustrated with commentators (and barrackers) that they can't see that one event impacts on the next. Had the kick in question been taken on, or after, the final siren then a result can be safely assumed.

                              BTW, cricket commentators are the worst. A catch is dropped and the batsmen run a quick single and the new batsman then gets bowled. "He should have two wickets," some idiot commentator yells.
                              Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                              Comment

                              • liz
                                Veteran
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16758

                                #30
                                The article doesn’t claim that the mistake cost the Swans victory, merely that it cost them in the game. Which clearly it did. It cost them five points.

                                As always, however, it is easy to fixate on particularly bad mistakes. (And clearly this was a particularly bad mistake from the goal umpire.) There was another blatant error when Ham wasn’t penalised for a clear cut HTB decision when she was trying to run the ball out of defence. That would have given the Bombers a shot at goal about 30m out. Though I don’t recall how play unfolded after that - ie whether they got a shot in the immediate passage of play anyway.

                                Comment

                                Working...