Terry Wallace

[Gunn]

Re: Re: Terry Wallace

Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
He is hardly going to sit back and say, "Thanks for the money Sydney. The yacht off Mallorca is great!"

The last thing he wants to do is incriminate Colless, does he? Then both he and RC would look bad.

Of course he didn't want to go to Sydney. Roos was there, and firming in favour, arguably due to the supporter backlash.

JF

IF Wallace was dudded and was entitled to damages for breach of contract he needs no 'non disclosure' agreement to get the money.

The Swans were on a winning streak long before Wallace resigned. He was the fans favourite. Wallace resigned with a week to go before the season ended and he said immediately he didn't want to leave Melbourne. He didn't even visit Sydney until after he had interviews with a few other clubs and only then because Colliss invited him to talk to the board. It would have been a dereliction of duty if Colliss failed to interview ALL the available and suiitable candidates. Wallace was both.

Is there anything I have written above you are incapable of understanding? Grind your axe elsewhere.

[Charlie]

Julian, it's clear as day that there is nothing substantiating your suggestions that it has happened. You're as bad as Caro in this respect - you assure us something did happen, but you've got no evidence to point at. You simply can't argue against the fact that after 8 months of nibbling by the Melbourne mafia, there has still been absolutely zilch in the way of evidence.

I'm asking you now to either come out with evidence, or quit the mudslinging. There is the right to presumption of innocence, you know.

[Reggi]

Re: Re: Re: Terry Wallace

Originally posted by Gunn
IF Wallace was dudded and was entitled to damages for breach of contract he needs no 'non disclosure' agreement to get the money.

The Swans were on a winning streak long before Wallace resigned. He was the fans favourite. Wallace resigned with a week to go before the season ended and he said immediately he didn't want to leave Melbourne. He didn't even visit Sydney until after he had interviews with a few other clubs and only then because Colliss invited him to talk to the board. It would have been a dereliction of duty if Colliss failed to interview ALL the available and suiitable candidates. Wallace was both.

Is there anything I have written above you are incapable of understanding? Grind your axe elsewhere.

Actually the scenario painted by the conspiracy theorists is almost impossible.

He already had a contract with WB - not out of it yet - Roos was owed the opportunity to year end.

Under what possible sense of responsibility could Sydney be paying him money?

Makes no sense whatsover

One of the dumbest little debates I've seen in football - over now.

[Bart]

Re: Re: Terry Wallace

Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
Roos was there, and firming in favour, arguably due to the supporter backlash.
JF

AND don't get me started on that last comment

[scurrilous]

Re: Re: Re: Terry Wallace

Originally posted by Gunn
IF Wallace was dudded and was entitled to damages for breach of contract he needs no 'non disclosure' agreement to get the money.

The Swans were on a winning streak long before Wallace resigned. He was the fans favourite. Wallace resigned with a week to go before the season ended and he said immediately he didn't want to leave Melbourne. He didn't even visit Sydney until after he had interviews with a few other clubs and only then because Colliss invited him to talk to the board. It would have been a dereliction of duty if Colliss failed to interview ALL the available and suiitable candidates. Wallace was both.

Is there anything I have written above you are incapable of understanding? Grind your axe elsewhere.

I love the tune of your bagpipes. Especially your post previous to this one.