Terry Wallace

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gunn
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 131

    #16
    Re: Re: Terry Wallace

    Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
    He is hardly going to sit back and say, "Thanks for the money Sydney. The yacht off Mallorca is great!"

    The last thing he wants to do is incriminate Colless, does he? Then both he and RC would look bad.

    Of course he didn't want to go to Sydney. Roos was there, and firming in favour, arguably due to the supporter backlash.

    JF
    IF Wallace was dudded and was entitled to damages for breach of contract he needs no 'non disclosure' agreement to get the money.

    The Swans were on a winning streak long before Wallace resigned. He was the fans favourite. Wallace resigned with a week to go before the season ended and he said immediately he didn't want to leave Melbourne. He didn't even visit Sydney until after he had interviews with a few other clubs and only then because Colliss invited him to talk to the board. It would have been a dereliction of duty if Colliss failed to interview ALL the available and suiitable candidates. Wallace was both.

    Is there anything I have written above you are incapable of understanding? Grind your axe elsewhere.

    Comment

    • Charlie
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 4101

      #17
      Julian, it's clear as day that there is nothing substantiating your suggestions that it has happened. You're as bad as Caro in this respect - you assure us something did happen, but you've got no evidence to point at. You simply can't argue against the fact that after 8 months of nibbling by the Melbourne mafia, there has still been absolutely zilch in the way of evidence.

      I'm asking you now to either come out with evidence, or quit the mudslinging. There is the right to presumption of innocence, you know.
      We hate Anthony Rocca
      We hate Shannon Grant too
      We hate scumbag Gaspar
      But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

      Comment

      • Reggi
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 2718

        #18
        Re: Re: Re: Terry Wallace

        Originally posted by Gunn
        IF Wallace was dudded and was entitled to damages for breach of contract he needs no 'non disclosure' agreement to get the money.

        The Swans were on a winning streak long before Wallace resigned. He was the fans favourite. Wallace resigned with a week to go before the season ended and he said immediately he didn't want to leave Melbourne. He didn't even visit Sydney until after he had interviews with a few other clubs and only then because Colliss invited him to talk to the board. It would have been a dereliction of duty if Colliss failed to interview ALL the available and suiitable candidates. Wallace was both.

        Is there anything I have written above you are incapable of understanding? Grind your axe elsewhere.
        Actually the scenario painted by the conspiracy theorists is almost impossible.

        He already had a contract with WB - not out of it yet - Roos was owed the opportunity to year end.

        Under what possible sense of responsibility could Sydney be paying him money?

        Makes no sense whatsover

        One of the dumbest little debates I've seen in football - over now.
        You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

        Comment

        • Bart
          CHHHOMMMMMPPP!!!!
          • Feb 2003
          • 1360

          #19
          Re: Re: Terry Wallace

          Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
          Roos was there, and firming in favour, arguably due to the supporter backlash.
          JF
          AND don't get me started on that last comment

          Comment

          • scurrilous
            On the Rookie List
            • Apr 2003
            • 311

            #20
            Re: Re: Re: Terry Wallace

            Originally posted by Gunn
            IF Wallace was dudded and was entitled to damages for breach of contract he needs no 'non disclosure' agreement to get the money.

            The Swans were on a winning streak long before Wallace resigned. He was the fans favourite. Wallace resigned with a week to go before the season ended and he said immediately he didn't want to leave Melbourne. He didn't even visit Sydney until after he had interviews with a few other clubs and only then because Colliss invited him to talk to the board. It would have been a dereliction of duty if Colliss failed to interview ALL the available and suiitable candidates. Wallace was both.

            Is there anything I have written above you are incapable of understanding? Grind your axe elsewhere.
            I love the tune of your bagpipes. Especially your post previous to this one.
            Only 9 notes? How easy can it be!

            Comment

            Working...