Saddo's desperate

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • Plugger46
    Senior Player
    • Apr 2003
    • 3674
    #31
    Originally posted by Mark
    This is an extremely dumb debate, if saddo is considered fit by roos he will play.

    I can only assume you either have not watched him play regularly of have absolutely no idea about football.

    Remind me who shut out Tarrant in the first game against the pies ?
    We won it in the midfield, that's why the ball didn't get anywhere near Tarrant. When it did, he kicked 4 last qtr goals.

    Tarrant did kick 5 goals I might add, his 2nd highest goal tally in a game this year. So I would hardly say he beat him.

    You cannot play underdone footballers in finals, especially when we don't desperately need him to play.

    Micky is the only underdone player, that we can play.
    Bloods

    "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

      Comment

      • Mark
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Jan 2003
        • 578
        #32
        Your point was not that he was underdone, rather "Saddington has been shocking this year, in the games he has played"

        Clearly, if he is not fit he does not play, but on ability he is in the side !

          Comment

          • Doctor J.
            Senior Player
            • Feb 2003
            • 1310
            #33
            Originally posted by Mark
            Clearly, if he is not fit he does not play, but on ability he is in the side !
            Exactly! End of arguement.

              Comment

              • undy
                Fatal error: Allowed memo
                • Mar 2003
                • 1231
                #34
                Originally posted by Craig
                Stevens has done nothing wrong and deserves his spot. Powell would be ok, but doesn't have the size to take a KPP - he is way too skinny.

                The fact that Stevens has more experience and is a better mark also make him the man for the job.
                Powell may be skinny, but his tackles stick a whole lot better than Stevens, who seems to get shrugged frustratingly easily. I reckon Powell is a pretty good mark too. Something to look forward to next year, a few more Powell-plays.
                Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

                  Comment

                  • stellation
                    scott names the planets
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 9737
                    #35
                    Originally posted by Dpw
                    He's not given them any reason to give him more time.
                    Talking about Ablett here... as far as I'm concerned making a good effort for a near impossible mark at the end of the Port Adelaide game and then crawling after it like a mad man on hands and knees showed enough heart and desperation to be reason to give him more time.
                    I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                    We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                      Comment

                      • Ajn
                        Draft Scout
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 711
                        #36
                        I am a fan of Powell and Stevens, but Stevens played a blinder in the backline against Port. We have finally found him a spot! However Seymour won't play so there is a spot for Powell, without replacing Stevens (who can go forward as well).
                        Staying ahead of the game...

                          Comment

                          Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                          Working...