Lots of ignorant Doyle comment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sharp9
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 2508

    Lots of ignorant Doyle comment

    Anyone who bags Doyle is, I'm afraid, simply ignorant of the facts.

    I have just finished an exhaustive analysis of the Roos match...here are the ruck stats. I have not included ruck or ruck roving free kicks in the stats, I am merely looking at effective ruck play, so, for example, when Maxfield was pinged for HTB it is listed here as a Sydney "first hands" but no clearance is recorded for that contest. First hands means just that, this includes a possession or a fumble. A clearance means an effective possession which either a) goes to a team mate or b) goes upfield and is not taken by the opposition.

    Shots means shots at goal resulting from rucking contests.

    I have also recorded who took what at every ruck contest and it is truly horrifying for Jude Bolton fans......9 occasions first hands on the ball for 1 clearance, 2 secondary bounces and 6 turnovers. A truly horror night for Jude included a miss on the run, terrible fumble under no pressure in D50 leading to throw in instead of rebound, poor handball contributing to the infamous 12 touch goal and one of the worst chips into the forward 50 you will ever see...25 metres down the line to 3 unopposed Roos. He also fell over after misreading a bouncing (errant) handball from Kirk in the centre...which resulted in a crucial Roos goal.

    By way of comparison Daniel Harris had first hands on 16 occasions for 1 turnover, 4 secondary bounces and....11 clearances

    Crucial error from Nicks which was the major contributor to the 12 touch goal...after handballing well to Barry in front of the sticks, Nicks did not shepherd King (or Stevens) and this was the reason as easy looking situation went down the gurgler. Crouch has 2 chances to kick long and there must be some blame out on midfielders not showing a marking otion down the wing. Doyle's error was not as bad as it looked, it was not a straight cough up, it was a perfectly timed bump from the Roo, nevertheless a big bloke like him should have withstood that pressure.

    I also noted nearly every contribution Doyle made..... as follows

    1 good contested mark
    1 dropped contested mark (beautifully timed run to get hands on it...but spilled resulting in goal to Roos, I think)
    3 times plugged the hole very effectively, spoils twice resulting in swift rebounds one goal to Schauble)
    1 time McKernan took a mark on him...outside fifty as a result of fantastic kick
    3 excellent pick ups of ground ball resulting in 1 swift rebound, 1 goal and 1 scoring shot
    1 good contest in front of goal, perfectly timed leap, requiring Archer to leave his man....goal to O'Loughlin
    2 lovely long kicks, one to the lead of Hall, one to Thewlis who should have been awarded a free (but wasn't).

    For those who complained about Doyle "giving away stupid, important free kicks," you are wrong. He touched the shoulder which may be a free but is almost never paid......except against the Swans, it would seem. He recieved 2 frees himself as well as having his head nearly ripped of by TWO Roos in a ruck contest ain OUR F50 and not receiving a free. Completely incorrect free paid against Ball in our D50 as well, BTW as we were royally @@@@ed by the umpires for a change.

    Doyle was the most effective ruckman on the ground by quite some margin, as these stats demonstrate.

    1st Quarter
    .................First Hands.......Clearance..........Shots

    Ball............10 - 1-------------3 - 2 -----------0.0 - 0.1
    Doyle...........5 - 4-------------5 - 0 -----------2.0 - 0.0
    Hall..............1 - 1-------------1 - 0 -----------1.0 - 0.0
    Goodes........0 - 1-------------0 - 1 -----------0.0 - 0.0

    2nd Quarter
    Ball..............4 - 5-------------2 - 5 -----------0.0 - 0.1
    Doyle...........4 - 4-------------4 - 4 -----------0.1 - 1.1
    Hall..............1 - 0-------------0 - 0 -----------0.0 - 0.0

    3rd Quarter

    Ball..............3 - 5-------------2 - 2 -----------0.0 - 0.1
    Doyle...........9 - 4-------------5 - 2 -----------3.0 - 1.0
    Goodes........2 - 0-------------2 - 0 -----------0.0 - 0.0

    4th Quarter

    Ball..............0 - 3-------------0 - 3 -----------0.0 - 1.1
    Doyle...........5 - 3-------------2 - 3 -----------0.0 - 2.0
    Hall..............3 - 1-------------1 - 1 -----------0.0 - 0.0
    Goodes........2 - 5-------------0 - 1 -----------0.0 - 0.1

    Total

    Ball.............17 - 14-----------7 - 12 ----------0.0 - 1.7
    Doyle..........23 - 15----------16 - 9 -----------5.1 - 4.1
    Hall...............5 - 2-------------2 - 1 -----------1.0 - 0.0
    Goodes.........4 - 6-------------2 - 2 -----------0.0 - 1.1


    Free Kicks in Ruck Play
    For Against
    Ball...........0 1
    Doyle........2 1 *plus one blatant not paid
    Hall...........0 1

    Any questions?
    "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005
  • Damien
    Living in 2005
    • Jan 2003
    • 3713

    #2
    Good work

    You have too much time on your hands though lol

    Comment

    • sharp9
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2003
      • 2508

      #3
      No, I'm just avoiding my work pretty effectively
      "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

      Comment

      • ROK Lobster
        RWO Life Member
        • Aug 2004
        • 8658

        #4
        Thanks sharp9.
        They seem like pretty useful stats. Much better than the [insert name] had [insert number] possessions and therefore must be worth 300K.
        BTW you must have a lot of time on your hands..

        Comment

        • sharp9
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2003
          • 2508

          #5
          Just as log as my wife doesn't know I'm not doing the housework right now!!!! (I work nights)
          "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

          Comment

          • Bear
            Best and Fairest
            • Feb 2003
            • 1022

            #6
            Good to see some informed, thoughtful analysis. Makes for a nice change.
            "As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
            Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.

            Comment

            • sharp9
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 2508

              #7
              Cheers, Bear
              "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

              Comment

              • NMWBloods
                Taking Refuge!!
                • Jan 2003
                • 15819

                #8
                Re: Lots of ignorant Doyle comment

                Originally posted by sharp9
                I have just finished an exhaustive analysis of the Roos match
                Ah, it's nice to see another nut do detailed analysis!

                I have also recorded who took what at every ruck contest and it is truly horrifying for Jude Bolton fans
                Not surprising - looked like he had very hard hands on Saturday, plus the usual case of failing to keep his feet.

                He also fell over after misreading a bouncing (errant) handball from Kirk in the centre...which resulted in a crucial Roos goal.
                I think this handball was actually from Bevan.

                I also noted nearly every contribution Doyle made..... as follows
                <SNIP>

                He recieved 2 frees himself as well as having his head nearly ripped of by TWO Roos in a ruck contest ain OUR F50 and not receiving a free.
                Yes - I recall that one. Certainly should have been paid if the last one was paid against him.

                Anyway, great work Sharp9 - some actual analysis and detail never goes astray amidst all the generalities.
                Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                Comment

                • Triple B
                  Formerly 'BBB'
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 6999

                  #9
                  Good stuff, but I fear you have wasted your time.

                  Anybody who fails to see that Doyle has the potential to be a gun, given time and a reasonable run of injuries, or at the very least concedes that at his still very young age, ruckwise, he is worth perservering with, well, they have next to no hope of deciphering what you have written there. No chance of understanding it.
                  Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                  Comment

                  • mja
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 164

                    #10
                    Does Doyle suffer from the big beanpole type shape that looks ungainly / ineffective just by the way he moves?
                    Ducks one week, Swans the next... just don't be a Goose till October!

                    Comment

                    • NMWBloods
                      Taking Refuge!!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15819

                      #11
                      Originally posted by mja
                      Does Doyle suffer from the big beanpole type shape that looks ungainly / ineffective just by the way he moves?
                      I think this is a factor in the views of him. He always looks quite uncoordinated. Certainly nothing like the smoother moving ruckman like Jeff White, Dean Brogan, Jamie Charman, etc.
                      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                      Comment

                      • Barry Schneider
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 530

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BBB
                        Good stuff, but I fear you have wasted your time.

                        Anybody who fails to see that Doyle has the potential to be a gun, given time and a reasonable run of injuries, or at the very least concedes that at his still very young age, ruckwise, he is worth perservering with, well, they have next to no hope of deciphering what you have written there. No chance of understanding it.
                        I agree Doyle has potential basing that more on some of the things he did before this year.He can mark but has lost his confidence this year.I think we will struggle if he is our number one ruckman next year.Plus his proneness to injury makes me nervous if we haven't recruited someone half decent for next year to share the load or takeover when the seemingly inevitable happens.
                        Just out of interest sharp9 when you say first hands and clearances does that automatically infer that Doyle got the tap down to our player? Half the time or more it is the skill of the midfielders to read taps rather than the skill of the ruckman to direct them that results in clearances.

                        Comment

                        • dawson
                          Senior Player
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 1007

                          #13
                          Good analysis Sharp.

                          Ultimately what matters is what the match committee decides.

                          Roosy is no dummy - if he has enough faith and trust in Doyle, thats enough for me.

                          Although all that still leaves the questions of LRT and Mieklejohn to be resolved.

                          With Kinnear, Mott, et al we havent had much luck in this position in recent times.

                          Comment

                          • Charlie
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 4101

                            #14
                            Great work. I have doubts about him - but you've made me rethink those. I'll have to watch him closer this weekend, huh?
                            We hate Anthony Rocca
                            We hate Shannon Grant too
                            We hate scumbag Gaspar
                            But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

                            Comment

                            • sharp9
                              Senior Player
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 2508

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Barry Schneider
                              Just out of interest sharp9 when you say first hands and clearances does that automatically infer that Doyle got the tap down to our player? Half the time or more it is the skill of the midfielders to read taps rather than the skill of the ruckman to direct them that results in clearances.
                              No, roughly 30% of ruck contests see a tap from a ruckman to the first hands of his own player.

                              Swans had maybe 2 clean clearances like this in the match.

                              Interestingly two of the clearances for the Roos against Doyle in the 4th Q (out of only 3) came from clear ruck wins to Doyle. Both resulted in goals, unfortunately.

                              In the first one he gave a fantastic punch forward and a very, very (un)lucky bounce saw it go to the Roos at their half back. In the other it was a classic tap down towards the Swans left half forward. The ball bounced for an eternity before Roo (12) ran on to it (exactly where players like Mitchell and Harris would have roved to their ruckmen). Very disappointing. Clean disposal straight into the 50....goal.

                              From my watching of the entire match there is no question that we more often receive advantage if Doyle is rucking than Ball. Hall is probably the best, though and Goodes gives more in the second phase of the contest.
                              "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

                              Comment

                              Working...