If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by Charlie Can someone tell me what Luke Taylor is doing playing in this match?
Clarke was definitely the one wearing no 46. I didn't spot Taylor playing but he, Aaron Rogers and Ryan Quade were all listed in the programme as top-up players.
Originally posted by liz Clarke was definitely the one wearing no 46. I didn't spot Taylor playing but he, Aaron Rogers and Ryan Quade were all listed in the programme as top-up players.
They also lsited both Rowan Warfe and Jarred Moore as wearing no. 33. 46 was definitely Clarke, and I think 45 was Shaw, since he was rucking.
Originally posted by liz Yup. Didn't get much game time but looks athletic for his height.
He also tended to shy away from getting into any situation that may force him to kick. One of my mates pointed out that he seemed to try to avoid getting the ball. Definitely didn't look as confident as Clarke.
I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
I meant in the Kirk v Dyson picture whose link I just fixed, and its actually Kirk v Alvey. On the right there's a Swan locking arms with Watson, I can't tell who he is. Kinda looks like Luke Ablett but I'm sure he didn't play.
Sorry, just realised that's what you meant when I actually opened the Kirk picture. And then deleted my post that you just responded to when I realised I was being slow.
My best guess would be Heath James. Headwise it only vaguely looks like him but the stance is right, and it is likely that he would have been playing on Watson at some time during the game. Also, the first number on the back of his guernsey is a 1, so that fits too.
Originally posted by liz Sorry, just realised that's what you meant when I actually opened the Kirk picture. And then deleted my post that you just responded to when I realised I was being slow.
My best guess would be Heath James. Headwise it only vaguely looks like him but the stance is right for him, and it is likely that he would have been playing on Watson at some time during the game. Also, the first number on the back of his guernsey is a 1, so that fits too.
Good guess, I do recall James playing on Watson in the 2nd half. Geez you're doing well considering the quality of those pictures. I think its time to get a new camera.
Originally posted by ugg Geez you're doing well considering the quality of those pictures. I think its time to get a new camera.
Nah - pictures look mighty fine to me!
And even with lowish resolution, the shape of the body and the way they hold themselves doesn't get blurred. That's how I tend to recognise players in the heat of battle anyway, when you can't see their number or head.
I reckon I could recognise most of the list just from seeing a photo from the waist downward (fully clothed and rear view only)
It WAS good to have a good win. And even better to see no players injured on what was a billiard table-like NSO surface.
But man, was it DULLLL. There were a few nice goals (that O'Keefe in the tree pocket was true Beckham stuff), but overall it was very very dull. Jolly looks like a more agile version of Ricky Mott (with far better skills). Whilst to my naked eye my best was Jarrod McVeigh, who always was poised in not only his foot-skills but his decision making.
They gave the crowd as 9000. I seriously doubt that. As a year-long NSO devotee, I'd say there were at least 12000 in attendance. A weird mix too. Heaps of business types and people in their best Von Dutch and Diesel Friday night duds. Lots of non footy types by the look of things. Was awesome seeing the stream of red and white coming out of the train at NorfSidnee station though.
I'm scared to say that many will not come back to footy after watching the fare on display tonight. But maybe that is me be a tad sensitive after what was not even a trial but an exhibition game of 15 a side.
What are your thoughts, all of you who went?
I have to ask, is there really any purpose to this fixture each year? Would it not be better to maybe play a match on a full-sized field at say Henson Park with 18 a side than play what really doesn't constitution to a real game of footy.
JF
PS:- I hurt my knuckle later in the night by handballing a full 1.5 litre Diet Coke. Kids, do not attempt this stuff, as it hurts like hell!
"Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
(Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)
Comment