Goodes and Davis to miss round 1?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16778

    Goodes and Davis to miss round 1?



    States that Roos is worried about picking too many underdone players in the first round match and thus not sure whether Goodes and/or Davis will get a guernsey.

    Although the article doesn't mention it, I suspect that this puts pay to any lingering hopes that Crouch might have of continuing his unbroken streak.

    It must also put Dempster in the box seat to make a round 1 debut.
  • Jeffers1984
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4564

    #2
    Fair enough from Roos. If they are too underdone, then we should definately not play them no matter who they are and should not be risked espeically only being in rd 1.

    We don't want a repeat of what Rocket did by playing ALOT of underdone senior players which led to alot of form slumps.
    Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

    Comment

    • Snowy
      On the Rookie List
      • Jun 2003
      • 1244

      #3
      Would I be wrong in suggesting that MOL gets preferential treatment, or is he just super essential so you can play him underdone. It also seems he doesn't get risked if he's sore yet others do.
      LIFE GOES ON

      Comment

      • sharp9
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2003
        • 2508

        #4
        Yep...and your point is?

        By which I mean, of course, that Roosey treats Micky exactly how 98% of us would if we were in his shoes. His stance is not controversial at all. The only surprising thing is that he is so candid about admitting the situation.

        All players are equal...but some are more equal than others. It has ever been thus.
        "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

        Comment

        • robbieando
          The King
          • Jan 2003
          • 2750

          #5
          Originally posted by Snowy
          Would I be wrong in suggesting that MOL gets preferential treatment, or is he just super essential so you can play him underdone. It also seems he doesn't get risked if he's sore yet others do.
          I wouldn't say your wrong in suggesting it as your pretty much right, but I think the fact Magic plays out of the goalsquare and can play at 75% and be effective plays a major role, where as Goodes and Davis aren't able to do the same and are needed elsewhere where fitness is needed more than the goalsquare.
          Once was, now elsewhere

          Comment

          • penga
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 2601

            #6
            also, magic will never reach fitness, so why wait for it?
            C'mon Chels!

            Comment

            • Ajn
              Draft Scout
              • Jan 2003
              • 711

              #7
              I tip Goodes to play a half and Davis to miss, from what has been said so far, A bit strange with Davis as it seems he is being hidden from view
              Staying ahead of the game...

              Comment

              • Bas
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4457

                #8
                Originally posted by Ajn
                I tip Goodes to play a half and Davis to miss, from what has been said so far, A bit strange with Davis as it seems he is being hidden from view
                The rumour is that he's grown his hair long and now looks like Kirstie Ally.
                In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                Comment

                • ROK Lobster
                  RWO Life Member
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 8658

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ajn
                  A bit strange with Davis as it seems he is being hidden from view
                  Why on earth would he be being hidden from view?
                  Last edited by ROK Lobster; 7 March 2005, 03:58 PM.

                  Comment

                  • dendol
                    fat-arsed midfielder
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 1483

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ROK Lobster
                    Why on earth would he be being hidden from view?
                    maybe he means Davis hasn't made an appearance all pre-season.

                    Comment

                    • liz
                      Veteran
                      Site Admin
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 16778

                      #11
                      Originally posted by dendol
                      maybe he means Davis hasn't made an appearance all pre-season.
                      A bit like Saddo, Goodes, O'Loughlin, Crouch, Schauble, Mathews, Ablett, M Davis, Sundqvist and Malceski?

                      A lot of "hiding" goin' on around the club.

                      Comment

                      • Nico
                        Veterans List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 11339

                        #12
                        The thing about MOL is that when he is very under done it is a waste of time having him out there. He needs a couple under his belt before he produces, and he is now a year older. Doesn't get any easier as the years roll by.

                        I reckon a 75% Goodes will give more value that a 75% MOL.
                        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                        Comment

                        • dendol
                          fat-arsed midfielder
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 1483

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Nico
                          The thing about MOL is that when he is very under done it is a waste of time having him out there. He needs a couple under his belt before he produces, and he is now a year older. Doesn't get any easier as the years roll by.

                          I reckon a 75% Goodes will give more value that a 75% MOL.
                          A 75% Goodes didnt give us that much last year. But then again, Im comparing that to his Brownlow year.

                          MOL's been playing at less than 100% for a few seasons now and is still producing enough for coach Roos to publicly declare that he is going to play round 1 ahead of both Goodes and Davis.

                          But like many comparisons made on this board, how do you value each players contribution to say if 75% output from one player is more valuable that 75% from another? Goodes plays a completely different role to MOL.

                          Comment

                          • Nico
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 11339

                            #14
                            My point was that when MOL is bad he is very bad, and that seems only when is under done like he will be in R1. I just hope he is not an embarrassment in R1. Then again there is a chance what Roos is saying is utter garbage and a ploy. As Robert Shaw said recently, top players only need a couple of hitouts to get to near top form.
                            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Plugger46
                              Senior Player
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 3674

                              #15
                              Micky generally plays a shocker first up. In 2003 he missed the first 3 games, then couldn't get near it against Hawthorn in his first hit-out. Then he bounced back the next week, helping us get over the dees which got our season rolling.
                              Bloods

                              "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                              Comment

                              Working...