McVeigh out

[chammond]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
I think it's like that for most of the game.

Then again, it's also a lot like U13 football - huge locust-like swarms following the ball around the field.

It's more like

B: Barry, C. Bolton, Roberts-Thomson
HF: Hall, O'Keefe, Davis
F: Jolly,
FOLL: Ball, Kirk, J.Bolton, Williams, Goodes, Maxfield, Buchanan, Mathews, Ablett, Kennelly, Crouch

[pillowtalk]

Originally posted by TheHood
I reckon Nicks should have been the first one gone too.

Me three.

[Sanecow]

Nicks will shine this week.

[ROK Lobster]

Originally posted by Sanecow
Nicks will shine this week.

Only if he waxes his bald spot.

[Ruda Wakening]

Osram.

[Sanecow]

Last chance for the bandwagon this season. Anyone not on board this week will be laughed at all the way to the club B&F.

[Rizzo]

New Boys Thrown To The Lions

I have to agree with Roos, the tackling last week was pretty weak.

Not sure on why Jarrad has been left out. Tackling?

Adam has been looking a little lost over the last two weeks.

[Ajn]

I'll answer the question of why McVeigh:

Point 1: He is week and will get pushed around by the Lions

Point 2: (see below)

http://sydneyswans.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=193750

Quote from above article:"and according to the man himself was "not too bad" despite falling away towards the end, to finish with eleven possessions and four marks."

If he thinks that is "not too bad" he needs to raise his sights to target a top level target. At best he was average, now I think he has a future....but has a fair bit to learn!

[Newbie]

Originally posted by Wil
So how would this be translated to the real game?
Something like:

B: Barry
HB: Goodes, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
C: Maxfield, Buchanan, C. Bolton, Mathews
HF: O'Keefe, Hall
F: Jolly, Davis
FOLL: Ball, Kirk, J.Bolton, Williams
Run-with: Crouch, L. Ablett

Close but no cigar.

B: Barry
HB: Goodes, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
C: Buchanan, C. Bolton, Mathews
HF: O'Keefe, Hall
F: Jolly, Davis
FOLL: Ball, Kirk, J.Bolton, Williams
Run-with: Crouch, L. Ablett
Bench: Maxfield

[Nico]

Originally posted by Schneiderman
Which neither Dempster nor Spriggs are??

Focus on the inclusions people... remember we apparently have an "embarrassment of riches" at the moment, so I suspect Roos might be thinking that now is a good time to blood two debutants.

I prefer dropping players to being forced through injury. And we still have Schmidt, Willoughby and Moore to debut

Er, Dempster's first game I believe.

[swansrule100]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
I think it's like that for most of the game.

Then again, it's also a lot like U13 football - huge locust-like swarms following the ball around the field.

not quite like it, my dad used to yell out at me when i played and id lean against the goal post

[swansrule100]

Originally posted by pillowtalk
Me three.

nicks deserves his spot in the team, cant see why he would be dropped.


This could really show mcveighs true colours, he should go back put in a blinder in the reserves and come back a more determined player!