McVeigh out

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chammond
    • Jan 2003
    • 1368

    #31
    Originally posted by NMWBloods
    I think it's like that for most of the game.

    Then again, it's also a lot like U13 football - huge locust-like swarms following the ball around the field.


    It's more like

    B: Barry, C. Bolton, Roberts-Thomson
    HF: Hall, O'Keefe, Davis
    F: Jolly,
    FOLL: Ball, Kirk, J.Bolton, Williams, Goodes, Maxfield, Buchanan, Mathews, Ablett, Kennelly, Crouch

    Comment

    • pillowtalk
      On the Rookie List
      • May 2003
      • 252

      #32
      Originally posted by TheHood
      I reckon Nicks should have been the first one gone too.
      Me three.
      He who laughs last thinks slowest

      Comment

      • Sanecow
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Mar 2003
        • 6917

        #33
        Nicks will shine this week.

        Comment

        • ROK Lobster
          RWO Life Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 8658

          #34
          Originally posted by Sanecow
          Nicks will shine this week.
          Only if he waxes his bald spot.

          Comment

          • Ruda Wakening
            Survived The Meltdown
            • Aug 2003
            • 1519

            #35
            Osram.
            Sit down or i swear to God i'll have you shot.

            Comment

            • Sanecow
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Mar 2003
              • 6917

              #36
              Last chance for the bandwagon this season. Anyone not on board this week will be laughed at all the way to the club B&F.

              Comment

              • Rizzo
                On the Rookie List
                • Jan 2003
                • 655

                #37
                New Boys Thrown To The Lions

                I have to agree with Roos, the tackling last week was pretty weak.

                Not sure on why Jarrad has been left out. Tackling?

                Adam has been looking a little lost over the last two weeks.

                Comment

                • Ajn
                  Draft Scout
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 711

                  #38
                  I'll answer the question of why McVeigh:

                  Point 1: He is week and will get pushed around by the Lions

                  Point 2: (see below)



                  Quote from above article:"and according to the man himself was "not too bad" despite falling away towards the end, to finish with eleven possessions and four marks."

                  If he thinks that is "not too bad" he needs to raise his sights to target a top level target. At best he was average, now I think he has a future....but has a fair bit to learn!
                  Staying ahead of the game...

                  Comment

                  • Newbie
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 720

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Wil
                    So how would this be translated to the real game?
                    Something like:

                    B: Barry
                    HB: Goodes, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
                    C: Maxfield, Buchanan, C. Bolton, Mathews
                    HF: O'Keefe, Hall
                    F: Jolly, Davis
                    FOLL: Ball, Kirk, J.Bolton, Williams
                    Run-with: Crouch, L. Ablett
                    Close but no cigar.

                    B: Barry
                    HB: Goodes, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
                    C: Buchanan, C. Bolton, Mathews
                    HF: O'Keefe, Hall
                    F: Jolly, Davis
                    FOLL: Ball, Kirk, J.Bolton, Williams
                    Run-with: Crouch, L. Ablett
                    Bench: Maxfield

                    Comment

                    • Nico
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 11339

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Schneiderman
                      Which neither Dempster nor Spriggs are??

                      Focus on the inclusions people... remember we apparently have an "embarrassment of riches" at the moment, so I suspect Roos might be thinking that now is a good time to blood two debutants.

                      I prefer dropping players to being forced through injury. And we still have Schmidt, Willoughby and Moore to debut

                      Er, Dempster's first game I believe.
                      http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                      Comment

                      • swansrule100
                        The quarterback
                        • May 2004
                        • 4538

                        #41
                        Originally posted by NMWBloods
                        I think it's like that for most of the game.

                        Then again, it's also a lot like U13 football - huge locust-like swarms following the ball around the field.
                        not quite like it, my dad used to yell out at me when i played and id lean against the goal post
                        Theres not much left to say

                        Comment

                        • swansrule100
                          The quarterback
                          • May 2004
                          • 4538

                          #42
                          Originally posted by pillowtalk
                          Me three.
                          nicks deserves his spot in the team, cant see why he would be dropped.


                          This could really show mcveighs true colours, he should go back put in a blinder in the reserves and come back a more determined player!
                          Theres not much left to say

                          Comment

                          Working...