Originally posted by Wazza
Outcoaching basically means making moves that change or alter a game, Roos seems incapable of making them, why didnt Hall move to the goal square to take miller out of the play, why when Melbourne kept dragging Kenneally to the goal square didnt Roos move him to a wing or HF....because Roos is one dimensional and fails to adjust his game plan during a game to suit what there are many other examples I could use.
Eade and Wallace are both Technically and Tactically well ahead of Roos if you dont believe so you live in some delusional red and white bubble.
Cheers
Waz
Outcoaching basically means making moves that change or alter a game, Roos seems incapable of making them, why didnt Hall move to the goal square to take miller out of the play, why when Melbourne kept dragging Kenneally to the goal square didnt Roos move him to a wing or HF....because Roos is one dimensional and fails to adjust his game plan during a game to suit what there are many other examples I could use.
Eade and Wallace are both Technically and Tactically well ahead of Roos if you dont believe so you live in some delusional red and white bubble.
Cheers
Waz
A more audacious move might have been to put Hall in the ruck but he would probably have struggled against the better technique of White.
Roos did move Kennelly to a wing at one point and it had no effect.
You make it sound like it is so easy to change a game around just by swinging a few moves. I suggest it is pretty hard when your players are just not hitting targets - not just one or two of them but most of them.
You are entitled to your views on Roos vs Wallace vs Eade and me to mine. If that means I'm sitting in a red and white bubble, so be it. What Roos has achieved in 2 and a bit years of coaching is comparable to what either Eade or Wallace achieved in their same period and, personally, I'm happy with the one we've got.

Comment