Goodes news bad news for vertically challenged Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stellation
    scott names the planets
    • Sep 2003
    • 9721

    Goodes news bad news for vertically challenged Swans

    I can't see that Scott has posted it yet (what/who the hell were you doing this morning Scott!). Sorry if it is somewhere else. A lot of interesting stuff in this.



    Stephen Doyle will go into hospital on Thursday and he'll be out for the rest of the season," Roos said.
    Roos said. "Having Goodesy in the ruck provides us with an attacking option that we haven't had and I think he enjoys his footy more in the ruck."
    Roos also confirmed Sydney's first selection in the 2004 national draft, 19-year-old Jarred Moore, would make his senior debut this weekend.
    I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
    We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    #2
    Sorry, I remember reading it and couldn't work out why I didn't post it.

    Then I remembered Ugg did - http://redandwhiteonline.com/forum/s...0&pagenumber=1

    So you can take those "nasty" comments back Stella!!!!

    Comment

    • Charlie
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 4101

      #3
      Congratulations Jarred Moore!

      The last two Swans to make their debut in their first seasons have been James Meiklejohn and Ricky Mott - both by necessity. He'd be the first Swan to force his way into the team in his first year since... O'Keefe?
      We hate Anthony Rocca
      We hate Shannon Grant too
      We hate scumbag Gaspar
      But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

      Comment

      • dendol
        fat-arsed midfielder
        • Oct 2003
        • 1483

        #4
        So it took injuries to 3 of our ruckmen for Roos to finally see that Goodes should be played in the midfield. Goodes' clearance stats against WCE alone should mean that he plays as either ruckman or ruck-rover from now on, with freedom to roam into defense or attack as he sees fit.

        Great news re Moore as well. Who makes way for him though....? My guess is Schneider - he was atrocious in the wet west.

        Moore's debut is a good thing, to be sure, but does this mean he is an exceptional talent, or does it mean that our other kids - Malceski, Willoughby, Schmidt - aren't that great?

        Comment

        • footyhead
          Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
          • May 2003
          • 1367

          #5
          Roos is quite right on the Goodes providing another attacking option form the ruck, I remeber one second half goal againts the Coasters on the weekend which was classic Goodes Circa 2003.

          Goode to someone to Goodes to Forward, goal !!! (or was that vice verca, with a goodes goal ?? can't remember.), why havn't they been playing this set up for the last 3 weeks at least. This was how it was when they played that great footy all that time ago.
          Last edited by footyhead; 4 May 2005, 09:07 AM.

          Comment

          • footyhead
            Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
            • May 2003
            • 1367

            #6
            Originally posted by dendol


            Moore's debut is a good thing, to be sure, but does this mean he is an exceptional talent, or does it mean that our other kids - Malceski, Willoughby, Schmidt - aren't that great?
            It means that he's an exceptional talent, but if we all put heaps of pressure on him now I bet within 2 years we can either turn him into a crap player or send him home.

            Comment

            • dendol
              fat-arsed midfielder
              • Oct 2003
              • 1483

              #7
              Originally posted by footyhead
              It means that he's an exceptional talent, but if we all put heaps of pressure on him now I bet within 2 years we can either turn him into a crap player or send him home.
              It wouldn't surprise me at all if he wanted to go home after turning out to be a midfield superstar. Roos will probably make him a tagger and play him in the back pocket

              Comment

              • footyhead
                Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
                • May 2003
                • 1367

                #8
                Off the bench for the next 3 years !!!

                Comment

                • stellation
                  scott names the planets
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 9721

                  #9
                  Originally posted by footyhead
                  Off the bench for the next 3 years !!!
                  It's the only way he will develop! That or game time. Just look at McVeigh!
                  I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                  We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                  Comment

                  • footyhead
                    Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
                    • May 2003
                    • 1367

                    #10
                    No you can't give him game time... 1st year players at the Swans are banned from getting game time till they become so bored with frustration that they conform to team rules - mediocrity at all costs.
                    Once that is acheived, the coach will never drop them no matter what they do, and he will never ever drop them to make way for a shinning up and come raw young talent.
                    Thats just the way things are at the Swans - crap player managment by a crap bunch of coaches and a crap footballing dept run by a crappy administration.

                    Comment

                    • Wil
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 619

                      #11
                      Goodes returned to the ruck for last weekend's clash with West Coast and Roos admitted seeing him there again confirmed one thing - it's probably the place for him.
                      BANG HEAD AGAINST DOOR MULTIPLE TIMES!

                      Alright it's official. Roos has no idea what he is doing.

                      If Barry Hall gets named Captain then I am ripping up my membership until we get a coach who has a bit of an idea about this Swans team.

                      Comment

                      • barry
                        Veterans List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 8499

                        #12
                        Goodes back in the ruck is good for the short term. It does mean we have to go "back" to a defensive midfield as Goodes wont get many taps.

                        It dashes our long term hopes of having Doyle/Jolly being effective tap ruckmen delivering to an attacking midfield, streaming the ball down to Hall/Goodes forward line. Possibly the only way we would win a flag.

                        Oh well, least we'll win a few games this year.

                        Comment

                        • sharpie
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 1588

                          #13
                          Originally posted by barry
                          Goodes back in the ruck is good for the short term. It does mean we have to go "back" to a defensive midfield as Goodes wont get many taps.

                          It dashes our long term hopes of having Doyle/Jolly being effective tap ruckmen delivering to an attacking midfield, streaming the ball down to Hall/Goodes forward line. Possibly the only way we would win a flag.

                          Oh well, least we'll win a few games this year.
                          I disagree.

                          Goodes got smashed in the hitouts, but he got a load of clean clearances. Hitouts become irrelevant for Goodes, because as ruckman, he is far more mobile than his direct opponent, and so will is able to recover far quicker and therefore is first to the ball, in front of almost every other midfielder in the centre square. If we was ruck-rover, he would have to contend with a smaller, faster and more mobile midfielder, which I doubt he would be as successful at.

                          Plus, our hopes of seeing Doyle at the centre bounce have probably been dashed anyway now that he is gone for the season.

                          And while Goodes is in the ruck, you can send Jolly or Ball to full forward. And then rotate them around so Goodes isnt being given too much of a workload.

                          Goodes in the ruck should have very little impact on the defensiveness of the midfield. In fact, if he can win a significant number of clearances himself, it is has the opposite effect.
                          Visit my eBay store -

                          10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!

                          Comment

                          • Barry Schneider
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 530

                            #14
                            Originally posted by sharpie
                            I disagree.

                            Goodes got smashed in the hitouts, but he got a load of clean clearances. Hitouts become irrelevant for Goodes, because as ruckman, he is far more mobile than his direct opponent, and so will is able to recover far quicker and therefore is first to the ball, in front of almost every other midfielder in the centre square. If we was ruck-rover, he would have to contend with a smaller, faster and more mobile midfielder, which I doubt he would be as successful at.

                            Plus, our hopes of seeing Doyle at the centre bounce have probably been dashed anyway now that he is gone for the season.

                            And while Goodes is in the ruck, you can send Jolly or Ball to full forward. And then rotate them around so Goodes isnt being given too much of a workload.

                            Goodes in the ruck should have very little impact on the defensiveness of the midfield. In fact, if he can win a significant number of clearances himself, it is has the opposite effect.
                            Agree with all that.As NMW said elsewhere hit outs are pretty irrelevant unless they are to a teammate who can clear the ball.
                            Goodes is like an extra rover in the centre square for clearance purposes and around the ground it is more the skill of the midfielders to clear the ball rather than the skill of the ruckman.
                            The only problem would be when the oppostion ruckmen decides to punch it forward at all costs which would negate Goodes roving ability.But he did win a Brownlow so he knows what he is doing.

                            Comment

                            • ugg
                              Can you feel it?
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 15970

                              #15
                              THE Prime Minister might be a cricket tragic, but he has taught Swans coach Paul Roos a thing or two about core and non-core promises - and breaking them.
                              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                              Reserves WIKI -
                              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                              Comment

                              Working...