Injury List after round 15

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeffers1984
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4564

    Injury List after round 15

    PLAYER INJURY STATUS
    Josh Willoughby Groin Test
    David Spriggs Knee 1-2 weeks
    Matthew Nicks Knee 3-4 weeks
    Stuart Maxfield Knee Indefinite
    Stephen Doyle Ankle Season

    Looks like Matty Nicks could most definately be gone at the end of the year now. A very untimely injury for him.
    Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

  • Doright
    Suspended by the MRP
    • Jul 2005
    • 18

    #2
    Doyle excepted, we must have one of the least impact injury lists going around

    Comment

    • cruiser
      What the frack!
      • Jul 2004
      • 6114

      #3
      We've done OK so far as injuries go this year (touch wood).
      Occupational hazards:
      I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
      - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

      Comment

      • DST
        The voice of reason!
        • Jan 2003
        • 2705

        #4
        Re: Injury List after round 15

        Originally posted by Jeffers1984
        Looks like Matty Nicks could most definately be gone at the end of the year now. A very untimely injury for him.
        Would agree the injury is untimely, but IMHO there are a couple of players to go before him in Fixter (just can't get on the field) & James (has been given the chance once recovered).

        Nicks is a very handy top up player in that he can play forward or back and has plenty of footy smarts and experience when called upon.

        DST
        "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

        Comment

        • Ruckman
          Ego alta, ergo ictus
          • Nov 2003
          • 3990

          #5
          Re: Re: Injury List after round 15

          Originally posted by DST
          Would agree the injury is untimely, but IMHO there are a couple of players to go before him in Fixter (just can't get on the field) & James (has been given the chance once recovered).
          I think they both played on the weekend.

          Originally posted by DST
          Nicks is a very handy top up player in that he can play forward or back and has plenty of footy smarts and experience when called upon.
          Here's hoping the Swans get him appointed as captain-coach of a ACTFL team.

          Comment

          • giant
            Veterans List
            • Mar 2005
            • 4731

            #6
            In the pre-match interview with Stuey on Sat nite, he suggested that he was 3-4 weeks away. But he did sound indefinite so I guess the injury list might be rite.

            Comment

            • Vivien
              On the Rookie List
              • Apr 2005
              • 261

              #7
              We've pretty much got all our best players fit at the moment, which we need with the tough games coming up. We've probably had one of our best years in a while as far as injuries go. Those who have been injured have been easy to replace.

              Comment

              • BonBon
                BMT2144
                • Jul 2004
                • 2190

                #8
                Oh yeah, I haven't seen Spriggs lately. No wonder.
                Vicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.

                Comment

                • giant
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 4731

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Vivien
                  We've pretty much got all our best players fit at the moment, which we need with the tough games coming up. We've probably had one of our best years in a while as far as injuries go. Those who have been injured have been easy to replace.
                  Don't you think that's a function of having our deepest squad for a long time? Seeing the best players list in the Ressies was very encouraging no matter who the opposition.

                  Brissie & Port have shown depth is a critical element in a premiership team. Having World's Worst CHB is only counter-argument to the new depth perspective I think.

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16739

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Vivien
                    Those who have been injured have been easy to replace.
                    Agree that we've had a very good run with injury, and any team needs to be able to cover the loss of a couple of good players without register a blip.

                    But we did miss Willo for a while, and this was exacerbated by losing Davis for part of the same period (in that he had been providing a bit of midfield class while Willo was out).

                    And being without Ball and Jolly for a couple of weeks didn't help but nor did it really affect our win/loss ratio. We'd have lost to WC even with both of them in and managed to beat the Bombers without them.

                    Comment

                    • Mark
                      Suspended by the MRP
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 578

                      #11
                      Originally posted by liz
                      We'd have lost to WC even with both of them in and managed to beat the Bombers without them.
                      And so saeth the Lord !

                      Or is that just your opinion ?

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16739

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Mark
                        And so saeth the Lord !

                        Or is that just your opinion ?
                        What angry pills did you take this evening.

                        I think it is fact that we beat the Bombers. You can argue it if you feel like it.

                        Yes, it was my opinion that we'd have lost to WC even with a ruckman. Does one have to write 'IMO' after every comment here or can we take it for read?

                        Again feel free to hold a different opinion. Argue your case if you can be bothered. No difference to me.

                        Comment

                        • Mark
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 578

                          #13
                          Originally posted by liz
                          Argue your case if you can be bothered. No difference to me.
                          No case stated in the original, just absolute fact

                          or opinion ?

                          Try to sit on a lower horse occasionaly , the view is nearly as good !

                          Comment

                          • ScottH
                            It's Goodes to cheer!!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 23665

                            #14
                            If the paper, there was an article abt the number of games missed by players, we were last on that list. And third last (I think), when it comes to top 22 players.

                            So that shows how good/lucky we've been with injuries.

                            PS: I wonder if the still count Maxfield in the top 22??

                            Comment

                            • bandwagon
                              Regular in the Side
                              • May 2003
                              • 520

                              #15
                              Yeah I saw that list - but isn't it wildly subjective as to who our 'best 22' are?

                              At the beginning of the year it would have been reasonable to put Maxfield, Doyle, Fosdike, Saddington, Ball, Williams & Schauble in our best 22. If you factor in their games missed it puts us closer to mid table - but I guess every team could do this...

                              What is good is that Buchanan, Ablett, and to a lesser extent LRT and Dempster have been able to get/earn extended runs in our starting 22.

                              Comment

                              Working...