Tweet
Memo Joe Dirt,
According to their annual reports Pennant Hills spent almost $70,000 more on their football department than the eagles. When we talk on this forum about "buying premierships", some factual substance would go a long way to enhancing your credability. It is easy for anyone to post whatever they want on this site, that is the beauty of it, free speech. It would be good however if occasionally people posted something that contains factual evidence to back up their statements.
Well said House. It seems a lot of people in Sydney Football mistake club promotion, information distribution and professionalism for arrogance and inflated egos.
The uninformed are quick to throw in the $$ line at every opportunity when the truth is that there are a number of clubs who would spend a similar amount to recruit players. Those clubs that have put in the hard work to be in a favourable financial position should be able to enjoy the benefits without persecution from those clubs / supporters who have not, after all isn't every club aiming to have the best list it can?
It is very rare that a senior team will be successful on the field without a professional and hard working administration, just having the dollars will not gaurantee success and if it does, rarely will it be sustained.
It is also very rare that a well ran, financial club does not get the opportunity to realise success. Anyone who has been involved in a successful club will quickly tell you that everything must be right, on and off the field, to have sustained success.
Those clubs that are striving to be professional, financial and ultimately successful should be looked at as the bench mark and not as someone who needs to be dragged back down to a level that everyone else can keep up with.
Good luck to all teams for 2006.
According to their annual reports Pennant Hills spent almost $70,000 more on their football department than the eagles. When we talk on this forum about "buying premierships", some factual substance would go a long way to enhancing your credability. It is easy for anyone to post whatever they want on this site, that is the beauty of it, free speech. It would be good however if occasionally people posted something that contains factual evidence to back up their statements.
Well said House. It seems a lot of people in Sydney Football mistake club promotion, information distribution and professionalism for arrogance and inflated egos.
The uninformed are quick to throw in the $$ line at every opportunity when the truth is that there are a number of clubs who would spend a similar amount to recruit players. Those clubs that have put in the hard work to be in a favourable financial position should be able to enjoy the benefits without persecution from those clubs / supporters who have not, after all isn't every club aiming to have the best list it can?
It is very rare that a senior team will be successful on the field without a professional and hard working administration, just having the dollars will not gaurantee success and if it does, rarely will it be sustained.
It is also very rare that a well ran, financial club does not get the opportunity to realise success. Anyone who has been involved in a successful club will quickly tell you that everything must be right, on and off the field, to have sustained success.
Those clubs that are striving to be professional, financial and ultimately successful should be looked at as the bench mark and not as someone who needs to be dragged back down to a level that everyone else can keep up with.
Good luck to all teams for 2006.
Comment