-
-
Surely he has no case?Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football." -
Leo should give Kennelly 25% for his bearhug on Sampi and Buchanan 10% for his graceful jump in front of the pack.Comment
-
LRT should also get 10%...Originally posted by ugg
Leo should give Kennelly 25% for his bearhug on Sampi and Buchanan 10% for his graceful jump in front of the pack.My Pokemon brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "Wanna trade cards?"
"Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"Comment
-
Jordan did it years ago.Originally posted by NMWBloods
Surely he has no case?I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
You mean surely he has a case. He gave no permission for its use, nor did the AFLPA. I assume this means the AFL used the picture as if it was simply an 'action shot' with a group of AFL players, hence the property of the AFL.Originally posted by NMWBloods
Surely he has no case?
It is a simple fact that the person that photo is all about is Leo Barry (you star!!). And it is recognisable for that fact. And that in 20 or 50 years time, it will be Leo Barry that people will recognise from that photo, and struggle with the others.
Using the image of any one player in a promo entitles them to royalties. Leo deserves them in this case the same as any other player they use in a 'stand alone' promotion.Our Greatest Moment:
Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pmComment
-
I suspect the choice of photo means his case isn't that strong. Had they used the picture of him at the top of his jump, taking the grab, it would clearly be a picture of Leo. But that shot is really just a group of players competing and, if you didn't know the circumstances, you wouldn't pick it as a picture of Leo over and above any of the other players shown.Comment
-
Yep. It's a photo of half a dozen or more players and mentions nor refers to any of them.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
The choice of photo shows Leo Barry and other players in a marking contest that is clearly similar to other photos of that marking contest in which Leo has marked the ball. The intent is clearly to promote that mark. Ask 100 random people familiar with the AFL and the majority will be able to identify when and where that photo was taken, and who marked the ball.Originally posted by liz
I suspect the choice of photo means his case isn't that strong. Had they used the picture of him at the top of his jump, taking the grab, it would clearly be a picture of Leo. But that shot is really just a group of players competing and, if you didn't know the circumstances, you wouldn't pick it as a picture of Leo over and above any of the other players shown.
If Leo is successful with his case I feel he should share the proceeds with the others in that photo. Without the others in that marking contest, it would have been another unremarkable defensive mark."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
Ridiculous Leo. Concentrate on playing football."As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Comment
-
Presumably that's why he's asked his manager to take care of it, the person who no doubt brought it to his attention in the first place.Originally posted by hammo
Ridiculous Leo. Concentrate on playing football.Comment
-
Obviously somebody is after his/her percentage. The problem is that Leo looks greedy not the manager.Originally posted by giant
Presumably that's why he's asked his manager to take care of it, the person who no doubt brought it to his attention in the first place.
Comment
-
Does the AFL have rights to the photos I took at the game? Or at any game? It's a load of bollocks.Originally posted by Schneiderman
You mean surely he has a case. He gave no permission for its use, nor did the AFLPA. I assume this means the AFL used the picture as if it was simply an 'action shot' with a group of AFL players, hence the property of the AFL.Comment
-
Clearly he is trying to bolster the trip away fund. Dont they always share the spoils with their mates. It is a team game you know.Comment
-
September 2005 = hero
10/6/06 = loser.
Was it Roy Cazaly who took a one hander in 1933 and we didn't win a flag for another 72 years.
Leo as they said on the tele is I think top 3 for frees against. Wonder how many goals have resulted. Probably having a decent affect on our %.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 09:27 PM.
Comment