Some 'interesting' stats prior to this round

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    Some 'interesting' stats prior to this round

    16th in disposals

    1st in net disposals (ie: differential)

    16th in marks

    3rd in net marks

    1st in ball gets

    2nd in Inside 50s

    2nd in Marks I50

    3rd best in conversion for goal

    4th best in scoring from a ball up

    2nd best in scoring from a throw in

    11th in net tackles

    1st in total hitouts

    10th in net hitouts (differential of -2)

    4th in total clearances

    A net +2 in clearances

    14th in ball-up clearances

    4th in free kicks for

    1st in free kicks against

    16th in free kick differential (-3)

    15th in handling errors

    4th in net handling errors (ie: we make less than our opponents)


    Overall the stats are quite favourable. Shows we were playing an effective style of football.

    Drop in tackles may be an indication of our poor endeavours against better teams.
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    #2
    I wasn't aware we had nets in AFL.

    Comment

    • elroy67
      Parking Cars
      • Mar 2005
      • 419

      #3
      You see them behind each set of goal posts during the warm up at Telstra Dome.
      We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #4
        Originally posted by elroy67
        You see them behind each set of goal posts during the warm up at Telstra Dome.
        Must be why our stats with them are so good for marks, and poor for tackles.

        Comment

        • elroy67
          Parking Cars
          • Mar 2005
          • 419

          #5
          Originally posted by ScottH
          Must be why our stats with them are so good for marks, and poor for tackles.
          Its interesting though, they are pretty big nets. You would think that you could tackle 3 or 4 at once with them.
          We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

          Comment

          • woo
            double vodka lemon pls
            • Sep 2005
            • 961

            #6
            Ummm..I think 15th in Handling errors surely says it all even thou the rest is quite positive
            you know what they say, dirty pants- clean botty

            Comment

            • Go Swannies
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2003
              • 5697

              #7
              Originally posted by woo
              Ummm..I think 15th in Handling errors surely says it all even thou the rest is quite positive
              Does that mean that 14 teams are better at making handling errors than we are? Do they play wearing boxing gloves?

              Comment

              • woo
                double vodka lemon pls
                • Sep 2005
                • 961

                #8
                Originally posted by Go Swannies
                Does that mean that 14 teams are better at making handling errors than we are? Do they play wearing boxing gloves?
                i would have thought we are 15th worst
                you know what they say, dirty pants- clean botty

                Comment

                • NMWBloods
                  Taking Refuge!!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15819

                  #9
                  We are the 15th worst in terms of total errors we make. Only Carlton makes more per game.

                  However, on the flipside, our opponents make more than we do on average.

                  Part of that is probably because in our big wins our opponents made a huge number of errors.
                  Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                  "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16617

                    #10
                    Originally posted by NMWBloods

                    Part of that is probably because in our big wins our opponents made a huge number of errors.
                    That is the problem with stats that average out the whole season. The disparity between Sydney's best (Richmond) and worst (Port and probably Collingwood in terms of ball use if not margin) has been huge. You lose a lot of information by looking at averages.

                    Comment

                    • NMWBloods
                      Taking Refuge!!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15819

                      #11
                      Now I look through the data there is no real discernible trend, except that we commit a lot of errors.

                      Only twice have we had less than 50 errors - Brisbane and Collingwood!!

                      Collingwood was actually our lowest number - 45. Collingwood had 52.

                      We average 59 errors per game. The best is 51.

                      It's difficult to say how much this stat matters now I look through the data as its correlation to performance is not strong.
                      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                      Comment

                      Working...