Pick Nick! (aka the new mega merged ND thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    #76
    Originally posted by goswannie14
    I'd take last year every year!
    You'd take last year over what?
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

    Comment

    • ROK Lobster
      RWO Life Member
      • Aug 2004
      • 8658

      #77
      Originally posted by NMWBloods
      You'd take last year over what?
      1934-2004

      Comment

      • melbloods78
        On the Rookie List
        • Jul 2006
        • 83

        #78
        we must play him against essendon if he is going to play again this season surely.
        www.fuselive.com.au

        Comment

        • NMWBloods
          Taking Refuge!!
          • Jan 2003
          • 15819

          #79
          Originally posted by ROK Lobster
          1934-2004
          I'd take it over a soggy piece of mouldy bread too, but it wasn't an option.
          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

          Comment

          • Chow-Chicker
            Senior Player
            • Jun 2006
            • 1602

            #80
            Originally posted by NMWBloods
            Riiight... so your argument is that because Davis was in those sides that lost, it's his fault we lost and hence we do better without him, as shown by wins over two struggling teams...
            Well if we win games against struggling teams without him, why do we need him against Essendon? And the fact that he WAS in the team when we played 4 of the top 5 teams, we didn't win. And the fact is, he performed very poorly in all those games. He's no Messiah.

            Comment

            • NMWBloods
              Taking Refuge!!
              • Jan 2003
              • 15819

              #81
              Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
              Well if we win games against struggling teams without him, why do we need him against Essendon? And the fact that he WAS in the team when we played 4 of the top 5 teams, we didn't win. And the fact is, he performed very poorly in all those games. He's no Messiah.
              He's not the messiah, he's just.. etc.

              He hasn't been playing his best, but neither has most of the team. Nevertheless, we need his type of player in finals.
              Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

              "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

              Comment

              • Snowy
                On the Rookie List
                • Jun 2003
                • 1244

                #82
                Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
                Gee whiz, great argument!. Now let's see, our losses to current top 8 sides, Melbourne, St.Kilda, Collingwood and Adelaide (all above us on the ladder) all consisted of Nick Davis. Ummm, yeah, he'll help us win!
                Melbourne was playing well and went off with a hammy, Adelaide dragged because he was playing poorly, Saints the result was 2 points in a slog in the wet. Hardly conclusive evidence either way. Wouldn't losses against those top sides be also reflective of the fact that the team struggled against the most competitive opposition? I think it's a spurious argument.
                LIFE GOES ON

                Comment

                Working...