Goodes "off field" activities affect his game.

[i'm-uninformed2]

Hang on a minute. The last time I recall Roos getting into a player was last year, with the player in question, Nick Davis. The reason Nick copped his wrath was because he stepped outside the "Bloods ethos".

Now maybe, just maybe, is there a rough chance that Goodesy may have stepped outside the circle in some way that may be impinging on his form. Football is his livelihood and he gets paid handsomely to ply his trade. Roos's job in part is to ensure his players prepare themselves in the correct manner for a game, so if a player is not in the right nick to run onto the ground he is entitled to bring him into line.

We have got to the GF twice in a row largely due to our iron clad discipline, dedication, desire and team attitude. It is inevitable that at some stage that ethos will be tested. Not right now though please Goodsey. Get back into that circle today thanks Goodesy.

By the way how long has he had the current lady hanging off his arm. Hope that's not the big distraction. Look what it did to Lleyton.

Hang on a minute. Does Goodes look unfit? No. Did Goodes look sluggish in pre-season games? No. Did Roos have reason not to pick him in the side? No, because he did pick him. If there was a problem, did Roos or the infamous leadership group deal with it? No, because if they did they are either hypocrites for playing him or the myth is just that.

So, it leads me to believe Roos left Goodes out to dry for what was partly a bad game, but also bad coaching

[NMWBloods]

Did I write a post that got deleted? For suggesting Roos might be pushing Goodes to greater heights?

Did I post it or did I think it?

Did I say that or just post it?

[KirksSocks]

You guys over analys everything on RWO. It gives me a headache just reading it all.

[DeadlyAkkuret]

You guys over analys everything on RWO. It gives me a headache just reading it all.

No we don't..and what did you MEAN by that?

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Is there an omen in this caption?