Scrap interchange: Lethal
Collapse
X
-
So that means the answer is 'no'.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
Hence what was the point of your original post?Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
No, I'm not blind...and I can read too.
Flooding does cause fatigue. Case in point round one vs WC. We'd all like to believe the true Bloods spirit came through to get us to within a point from nowhere, but the simple fact is WC ran themselves into the ground into the first half. Limited interchange would have magnified this problem for them.
All your arguments hinge on BOTH teams and ALL players being fatigued. This would not happen.
And not being able to interchange players that are on the field would make them more fatigued.Comment
-
Comment
-
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
Lethal is starting to think he's a football sensei, that he's some wise old man, i call it Sheedy syndrome. Rotating players keeps them fresh, helps them recover from any niggles, and keeps the level of football at it's optimum. I can't see any rational reason for Leigh's ideas, and don't see a problem with the current interchange rules.Comment
-
The game was also slower "back in the day", and not just because of the interchange rules, but there are many rules that have made the game faster today.
Lethal is starting to think he's a football sensei, that he's some wise old man, i call it Sheedy syndrome. Rotating players keeps them fresh, helps them recover from any niggles, and keeps the level of football at it's optimum. I can't see any rational reason for Leigh's ideas, and don't see a problem with the current interchange rules.Comment
-
Comment
-
What I like about the idea of a reduced or removed interchange is that players have to be a bit more versatile, and match day coaching is emphasised a little more. I also agree that because the 22 are all effectively players, with no real reserves, an injury or 2 really disadvantages the injured side.Comment
-
I agree with that 100%. Those rules are stupid anyway.
What I like about the idea of a reduced or removed interchange is that players have to be a bit more versatile, and match day coaching is emphasised a little more. I also agree that because the 22 are all effectively players, with no real reserves, an injury or 2 really disadvantages the injured side.Comment
-
Actually I think you interpreted correctly from memory. Going back to the old days would crucify all the players playing under todays rules. Face it, the game is much quicker today than what it used to be. Making the bench smaller is farcical, limiting the number of interchanges is just making another rule for a rules sake. Hey why don't we split our ground into three zones and only allow a certain number of people in each zone at any one time?Comment
-
...and match day coaching is emphasised a little more.Comment
Comment