Why the heck wouldn't a decent person apologise after having just basically told a father they "******" his daughter, not realising the picture they referred to was a 6y.o? Players often apologise after bumps etc, even just if it's in passing, and if it was in fact a misinterpretation of the tatoo on Selwood's part, why continue with it, why not back off, say sorry at the appropriate moment (ok maybe not immediately after, but certainly at the next break or the end of the match) and do the decent thing considering he'd just said what he did? Instead he carried on with it, made it worse and now look where it's all at. I know you're trying to understand it NMW but, for mine, I just can't. There's being a sportsman and then there's being a gentleman, and the two should never be mutually exclusive. If you stuff up you should be man enough to apologise and try to smooth it over, not grab the shovel and dig your hole deeper as Selwood appears to have done.
Yes sledging is a part of the game, but this, and the cricket example provided by CC are both very good examples of where players take it too far. If they have to resort to that to get the advantage then it says more about their skills as a player and their intellect than it does about the person who responds imo.
Yes sledging is a part of the game, but this, and the cricket example provided by CC are both very good examples of where players take it too far. If they have to resort to that to get the advantage then it says more about their skills as a player and their intellect than it does about the person who responds imo.

Comment