if we cant beat hawthorn

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    #31
    Originally posted by Vivien
    I doubt it. McLaren would be treading on eggshells if we had him again this weekend. We may even get favourable treatment from the umpires. They'll be out to save face after Saturday night.
    You're kidding right? The only way that would happen is if Roos or Hall or whoever came out, bagged the umpires, copped a $20,000 fine. That's what Essendon did a few years ago, and they are still looked after. I am referring to all of their games, not just against the Swans.
    Does God believe in Atheists?

    Comment

    • Industrial Fan
      Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
      • Aug 2006
      • 3318

      #32
      Originally posted by NMWBloods
      Yes, with better umpiring we may have won, but playing better would have had a bigger impact.
      That is a very aggravating point of view.

      Of course we can play better than Essendon. And we can play much better than we did on the night. That doesn't change the fact that we did enough to win - except for the intervention of the umpires.
      He ate more cheese, than time allowed

      Comment

      • NMWBloods
        Taking Refuge!!
        • Jan 2003
        • 15819

        #33
        Originally posted by Marry me Goodes
        That is a very aggravating point of view.

        Of course we can play better than Essendon. And we can play much better than we did on the night. That doesn't change the fact that we did enough to win - except for the intervention of the umpires.
        I don't think we did do enough to win.
        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16778

          #34
          Originally posted by NMWBloods
          I don't think we did do enough to win.
          Two inches shorter padding and we would have won. So in that sense they did do enough to win. But of course they didn't actually win so in that sense they didn't do enough.

          Does any of this make sense

          Comment

          • NMWBloods
            Taking Refuge!!
            • Jan 2003
            • 15819

            #35
            Originally posted by liz
            Two inches shorter padding and we would have won. So in that sense they did do enough to win. But of course they didn't actually win so in that sense they didn't do enough.

            Does any of this make sense
            Maybe!

            I reckon the ball still would have hit the post anyway, given its direction.

            As for the umpiring, even if the ball had been called out, it doesn't mean that everything else would have occurred the same and hence we win.
            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

            Comment

            • Eala ?ireann
              Beidh an l? linn!
              • Dec 2005
              • 256

              #36
              I have to say the umpiring cost me my night's sleep and probably a year off my life-expectancy. It was horrendous (as is the rule they're being compelled to enforce), but the Bombers beat us, NOT the men in yellow!

              We delivered the ball badly and had a real lack of intensity for much of the game. Often, people were completely static when the ball carrier was looking for an option upfield.

              Umpires = fools, yes. Swans however, need to get their act together, pull their finger out, pull up their socks..........
              Ar aghaidh chun bua 2007!

              Comment

              • Bleed Red Blood
                Senior Player
                • Sep 2003
                • 2057

                #37
                Originally posted by swansrule100
                Which game has been decided purely because the umpires stuffed up??
                2004 - Essendon VS Sydney at the Telstra Dome.

                - Craig Bolton takes a mark, Dean Soloman is given a free kick, goal.
                - Nathan Lovett-Murray throws the ball to Lloyd, goal.
                etc.

                Comment

                • Industrial Fan
                  Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 3318

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
                  2004 - Essendon VS Sydney at the Telstra Dome.

                  - Craig Bolton takes a mark, Dean Soloman is given a free kick, goal.
                  - Nathan Lovett-Murray throws the ball to Lloyd, goal.
                  etc.
                  Worst umpiring decision I have seen yet.

                  That game is burnt in my mind.
                  He ate more cheese, than time allowed

                  Comment

                  • NMWBloods
                    Taking Refuge!!
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15819

                    #39
                    That was one of the worst displays of umpiring I can remember, but again it wasn't why we lost. Giving the Bombers a 7 goal break had more to do with it!
                    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                    Comment

                    • DeadlyAkkuret
                      Veterans List
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 4547

                      #40
                      I'm so tired of hearing "It's not the umpires fault, we were beaten by a better team" etc etc. Was the scoreline not 11.8 to 11.7? so Essendon have one more point than us, yet some people are acting like they had 20 more scoring shots and we should be lucky we only lost by a point. I admit Sydney played sloppy, frustrating football, but i still think we deserved the win, and there were too many blatant umpire 'errors' to just put it down to the umpires having a bad night.

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16778

                        #41
                        Originally posted by NMWBloods
                        That was one of the worst displays of umpiring I can remember, but again it wasn't why we lost. Giving the Bombers a 7 goal break had more to do with it!
                        err...they never had a 7 goal break. That is a 42 point lead. I don't think their lead ever got up much further than 24 points and that was in the first 10 minutes. The Swans were well back into the contest by midway through the first quarter, even though they still lagged by just under 3 goals on the scoreboard.

                        Comment

                        • Triple B
                          Formerly 'BBB'
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 6999

                          #42
                          NMW is talking about the MCG game in 2004 when he talks of the 7 goal lead. You guys need to keep up.
                          Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                          Comment

                          • NMWBloods
                            Taking Refuge!!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15819

                            #43
                            Thank you!
                            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • goswannie14
                              Leadership Group
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 11166

                              #44
                              Originally posted by BBB
                              NMW is talking about the MCG game in 2004 when he talks of the 7 goal lead. You guys need to keep up.
                              I thought it was TelstraDome.
                              Does God believe in Atheists?

                              Comment

                              • NMWBloods
                                Taking Refuge!!
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 15819

                                #45
                                Originally posted by goswannie14
                                I thought it was TelstraDome.
                                That was 2006.
                                Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                                "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                                Comment

                                Working...