-
-
So whose going to play on Newton or Robertson or Miller (if they send him forward) while Bolton is standing Neitz? I know Bolton is good, but to expect him to cover every tall forward on his own is a bit much.
At least one of Grundy or Richards is a cert to play - and to remain in the team until Barry is ready to return, and quite possibly beyond that too.Comment
-
Still cringe at that 2005 GF brilliant pass to Cousins. Come to think of it the one thing that stands out in his career, no 2 things, his third up in the last Q and desperate dive to knock the ball back in against Geelong in that famous Nick "i see it but dont believe it" Davis SF. Apart from that I struggle to come up with many highlights.
In his defence though his last 2 years he has struggle with back related hammies, but that's what happens when players are continually played injured.Comment
-
Who'll play on Newton then? or Miller or Holland if they go forward?Comment
-
This is from another thread, but I'm responding to something relevant to this threadand clearly still harbours hopes of his 200th game sometime later this season. We'll see.
Also tips Ted to make way for Ablett - with Laidlaw and Dempster unsurprisingly set to miss.
I have to wonder sometimes whether somehow Dempster has just worked himself into a position where the coaching staff have a definite view of the type of position that he will play because of his aerobic capacity. If they are keeping Grundy in the team as a tall defender, apart from weight (and I don't really see Heath as looking particuarly stronger than Sean) they physically don't differ too much... except I would say that Sean is significantly more athletic than Heath. Has someone just looked at two and decided "You- you're a flanker/wing... you- you're a KP prospect!"... Heath is a strong mark for his size, but Sean is too... I normally have a bit of an issue with Sean, but that is because he doesn't seem overly creative as a HBFer, I think his man on man defensive work is perfectly fine, and being a creative HBFer doesn't exactly appear to be the type of role they are trying Heath out in... and I like the idea of Heath as a defender...
Sean vs. Heath
Height: 191 vs. 192
Weight: 89 vs. 97
Games (2007): 12 vs. 7
Avg Disposals: 10.5 vs. 5.9
Goals: 3.4 vs. 0.1I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
I agree with stellation....Dempster, although a little light, has shown he is a good spoiler and could run any of the three you mention, off their feet. Grundy is 1 cm taller, heavier (but not noticably stronger), slower and with no where near the staying power, and not as versatile.... Dempster should not of been dropped in the first place, after a pretty good game against the beagles.
I sense both Brennen and Grundy are on trial for next year, I see no other reason for their sellection above other ,more obviously worthy, candidates.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
-
Dempster is very unlucky but not because of bias against him. He is a running back and with Kenneally and Milcevski together again our defensive structure simply doesn't need three running backs. He's clearly not a key position defender (not enough upper body strength) and isn't nippy enough or strong enough in the tackle to take the small forwards. His other role as a running midfield defender (as against Embley) isn't really needed with the D's blue collar short arsed midfield. Don't think he was dropped after the Eagles game because of poor performance (he had 22 touches and 4 tackles) but because of a lack of a match up. Dempster is like the wallflower at the dance at the moment - can't find a match up.This is from another thread, but I'm responding to something relevant to this thread
I have to wonder sometimes whether somehow Dempster has just worked himself into a position where the coaching staff have a definite view of the type of position that he will play because of his aerobic capacity. If they are keeping Grundy in the team as a tall defender, apart from weight (and I don't really see Heath as looking particuarly stronger than Sean) they physically don't differ too much... except I would say that Sean is significantly more athletic than Heath. Has someone just looked at two and decided "You- you're a flanker/wing... you- you're a KP prospect!"... Heath is a strong mark for his size, but Sean is too... I normally have a bit of an issue with Sean, but that is because he doesn't seem overly creative as a HBFer, I think his man on man defensive work is perfectly fine, and being a creative HBFer doesn't exactly appear to be the type of role they are trying Heath out in... and I like the idea of Heath as a defender...
Sean vs. Heath
Height: 191 vs. 192
Weight: 89 vs. 97
Games (2007): 12 vs. 7
Avg Disposals: 10.5 vs. 5.9
Goals: 3.4 vs. 0.1Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
Schmidt out!
Emergencies: Schmidt, Laidlaw, Dempster.Comment
-
Reputation, reputation, reputation.Comment
-
Percentage Key
Percentage will be key in this win.
Saints will win, so a must win, but we will thrash Melbourne.
Why would they want to win? too important picks in the draft to come for 08.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
I'd prefer a runner, to run him off his lazy legs....ie Dempster or Laidlaw
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 06:54 AM.
Comment