I thought the reason for putting blokes on the LTI list was so rookies could be elevated. If the deadline for rookie elevation has passed, why bother.
Swans injury list before round 20
Collapse
X
-
-
Crouch is not on the injury listed as shown on the Swans Web site, although I have seen his name on other lists.
Not hearing anything specific about a re-injury, I would assume the Swans site is correct.
As for the 3 now listed as long term injured, it would seem irrelevant to put anyone on the list unless there was a prospect of elevating a rookie. I don't know of any other ramifications for such a move, but then, I haven't read the rules on this subject. Maybe the paperwork has been submitted, but has not been approved by the AFL yet, so no announcement has been made. Also possible that no announcement will be made in any case, unless an elevated rookie will actually play.Comment
-
It has something to do with TPP and how much each club is allowed to spend over the salary cap due to long term injuries.
So yes there is a point.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

Comment
-
Four. Faulks and DOK were placed on it around the same time - with Brennan elevated for one and possibly Jack for the other. The comment about no players elevated this time round relates to Doyle and Currie now being placed on the list.Comment
-
He'd be on a very small contract if he stays. But he is a good back up. We got within 1 point of back to back because he stood up at the right time last year. He is a talent, just spends so little time on the field.Comment
-
Comment
-
"In some ways we?re less predictable to ourselves and sometimes that can be detrimental because we don?t really know where we?re going" - P.RoosComment

Comment