-
?????,?????_ ???RED&???WHITE[?]
official "ressies" supporter :D -
You are right Layby, I can't believe anyone would say we should get rid of Mick!
OK, he is 31ish but he is the spark and skill that our side lacks - plus lets face it - he does have a few points in the bank.
Crouch should be allowed to 'retire' and McVeigh doesnt seem to rise to the occasion very often.Comment
-
good comment hammo, if we look at the port side from fri night they had 10 survivors from their 04 side , 11 with wakelin who is injured but is retiring anyway.
whats coming through there is exciting pearce, westhoff, gray, salopek, motlop
roosy take a leaf out of chocos book and malthouse s
youth is the way to goComment
-
Every season the make-up of our team is so delicately balanced.
The reason that we were able to play in the GF in the previous two years is because of the way Roos was able to get the most out of a team not filled with high quality players (particularly in the midfield), but which remained relatively injury free. However things fell apart this year, starting with Hall.
The MOL and Hall issues were created because Hall did not have the fitness / form to play as a lead-up CHF where he belongs. With both Hall and MOL occupying the same space in the forward 50, Davis was left out in the cold.
If Hall had an injury free (and confidence rejuvenated) year the structure should work again, with O'Keefe as the wildcard.
As for trades, we need to secure good midfielders with pace if we go down that path.
If Jolly wants to leave and Doyle could stand up for a year we could get a midfielder of quality. However, all the experts keep saying that this year's draft is very poor - so there is no point trading the likes of Jude if we were only going to get rubbish in return.
Most of the players mentioned for trade are not on big $, so it would be better to keep them than get rid of them for nothing.
Bevan is a huge worry, he showed real grit and determination when he first joined the team (like LRT), but is a bundle of nerves. I said in June that he should not be played in defence (as his mistakes were far too damaging), but he seemed real slow this year. His time is probably up. I wanted Dempster to succeed, but he is also a bundle of nerves (thought that he would have improved by now) - maybe his time is up.
Ablett and Crouch (injury free) still have pace and should be kept - defensively we are much poorer when they do not play.
I would be happy to give up Fosdike, but doubt that he is worth much on the open market. McVeigh? Maybe, but again what would we get in return? I don't want garbage picks in a rubbish draft when the players are not costing the club big $.
Our best options for trades are probably with players we could not afford to lose, like O'Keefe. Would robbing Peter to pay Paul garner success? If we could get a real high quality midfielder (mid to low 20s) for O'Keefe then it might be worth it - but I would hate to lose him and it would probably come back to bite us in a couple of years when MOL retires and Hall declines.
Hopefully the new Irishman Murphy can pick up the game like Kennelly and provide something fresh to the team.Comment
-
I'm really not sure if Hall can return to the form of previous years given the new rules. O'Keefe needs to work a lot harder now given he gets a lot more attention.
I think our forward line should consist of Davis deep and leading long a la Williams of Hawthorn. MOL and O'Keefe to play as other leading targets, more to the flanks than the centre, and also as marking options. Hall to play further up the ground as a link from wing to F50. Drop a ruckman into the goal square on occasions to vary it. Use Schneider, McVeigh and/or Philips as crumbers.
Little downside.However, all the experts keep saying that this year's draft is very poor - so there is no point trading the likes of Jude if we were only going to get rubbish in return.
Ablett does not have 'usable' pace and Crouch is too slow now.Ablett and Crouch (injury free) still have pace and should be kept - defensively we are much poorer when they do not play.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
As an injury free lead-up CHF the new rules would help Hall.
Ablett has enough pace to serve as a run-with player (with the ability to create on the rebound - especially when compared with our other options). Crouch was too injured this year to tell - but he was a genuine sprinter and they don't usually lose all their pace that quickly.Ablett does not have 'usable' pace and Crouch is too slow now.Comment
-
I am pleased to see a little sanity. Our expectations are too high; we got towelled up last night, our guys look tired, Jolly disinterested. Unfit players never stack up especially in finals: LRT: not match fit, Leo: ditto, Bary, severely restricted, Schneider; carrying and in jury, and wouldn't be surprised if ROK was the same.
As for the Donk, I believe he signed a two year deal last year.
Wat about, Jolly wants to go: wat about a swap for Fev: two big power forwards, or, Jolly for a top midfielder: Doggies need a ruckman, straightg swap for someone like Cooney. Fletcher from WCE will be traded, would add some class to our midfield. With LRT having a full year, Leo into a back pocket, Tadgh fit, and some improvement from the likes of Barlow, Laidlaw and perhaps Brennan (can play), we should be there about..
Reacting and wanting to get rid of a team that has played in a prelim, 2 GFs and an elimation final, is ill informed..Comment
-
I've been a Jude fan - he's tough, good leader & does plenty of hard work. But he seems to have plateaued at the Swans & perhaps a move on would be best. I think he'd be a useful addition at a number of clubs.
As for what we're looking for, I think the Pies showed us last night we can't rely on a couple of aging crocks as our big forwards (any reason why Roos didn't try the ruckmen up forward last night?). So, we either turn Ted into a lead up CHF & hope his goalkicking improves or we try again. And I tend to agree there's probably not roomfor both Mick & Barry unless the club is convinced the 2003-6 version of Barry can return - if not, maybe time for Mick to move on.
Other than that, there seriously isn't any real trade bait in this squad (subject to Jolly's intentions). Fight on, bounce back & blood some newbies.
I reckon Malceski is the only player who can say he's really improved this year which leaves a lotof upside for next year!Comment
-
That's not right. There are 20 premiership players on the list and some would command some decent exchanges with the right clubs.
Some potential trade baits are -
Buchanan
Schneider
O'Keefe
Ablett
J.Bolton
Dempster
Davis
Malceski
Jolly
Fosdike
Everyone has there favourites but there seems to be universal acceptance by everyone except Paul Roos that the current list won't win us another premiership.
Chris Tarrant was traded by Collingwood for a first round pick - they ended up with 2 top 10 picks last year. That's how to rebuild a list."As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Comment
-
Um, in a word, no. Why would we trade the kind of players that we need more of? for a gamble that might now even pay off. The rest, i agree with to an extent, depending what was offered for them, but not Malceski, and we wouldn't trade O'Keefe unless we could get a gun midfielder.Comment
-
Ed Considine's day out - Round 3, 16th April 1995.
11 Kicks, 13 Handballs, 8 Marks, 1 Goal, 1 Behind, 1 Tackle, 1 Hitout, 3 Brownlow votes (his only votes)
Ed = GodComment
-
Barry's too slow now - Rusling was easily beating him for pace.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 03:19 AM.
Comment